this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
804 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

63897 readers
5943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A team of volunteer archivists has recreated the Centers for Disease Control website exactly as it was the day Donald Trump was inaugurated. The site, called RestoredCDC.org, went live Tuesday and is currently being hosted in Europe.

As we have been following since the beginning of Trump’s second term, websites across the entire federal government have been altered and taken offline under this administration’s war on science, health, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. Critical information promoting vaccines, HIV care, reproductive health options including abortion, and trans and gender confirmation healthcare have been purged from the CDC’s live website under Trump. Disease surveillance data about bird flu and other concerns have either been delayed or have stopped being updated entirely. Some deleted pages across the government have at least temporarily been restored thanks to a court order, but the Trump administration has added a note rejecting “gender ideology” to some of them.

“Our goal is to provide a resource that includes the information and data previously available,” the team wrote. “We are committed to providing the previously available webpages and data, from before the potential tampering occurred. Our approach is to be as transparent as possible about our process. We plan to gather archival data and then remove CDC logos and branding, using GitHub to host our code to create the site.”

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 42 minutes ago

It's weird living in a world where people are rescuing our past from the Ministry of Information sponsored Memory Hole.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 hours ago

https://source.coop/ Someone put up 16tb of data.gov data here too

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I hope California, blue states, and Europe all bankroll this into an official Neo-CDC, free of Yarvin's hatred and stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago

Europe won't do a thing with these initiatives, at least not in any official manner (what they can do though is to ensure EU web hosters of this stuff aren't feeling the pressure). They've enough to do restructuring their economy and military, all the while also dealing with war and fascism from the east. They won't risk Trump having another tamper tantrum, at least not before the EU and its allies are widely decoupled from the US economy.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Data preservationists are beating back the coming dark age. They're heroes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

And they called us data hoarders!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They're either beating it back or delaying it. I hope it's the former, but I fear it's the latter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 28 minutes ago

If they screw shit up too much there are already the nerdiest of nerds working on decentralized wireless networks. They'd be slow is heck, but I heard many people prefer web 1.0 over todays' bloated crap anyway.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 11 hours ago

I was just thinking earlier today: I really, really hope someone is backing up the Library of Congress' stuff, particularly Chronicling America, which has almost every newspaper issue (searchable by text and much more) from 1756 - 1963. Like archive.org -- federal edition, sort of.

Anyway, given how fascists love to erase history, it's precisely the kind of thing I could see them targeting. Particularly if you wanted to erase the fact that, oh, I don't know, your father Fred Trump was arrested at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1927. That kinda thing.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

using GitHub to host our code

I can't possibly think of any way that could backfire.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft suddenly getting ordered by the DoJ to pull offending projects from github Or Else.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

if that happens, people should migrate to gitlab or forgejo. gitlab is a Ukrainian company, and forgejo development is primarily driven by Codeberg in Germany.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

people should just automatically push to all three as a backup from the start, tbh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 minutes ago

They don’t need to, because git is already decentralized. All the history is usually on everyone’s computers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Any opinions on gitea? Idk I’ve been using it for about a year and it works nicely

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

of the gogs family tree it's my middle favorite.

  1. forgejo
  2. gitea
  3. gogs

forgejo gets the edge because of federation. gitea's corporate situation is less than ideal. gogs simply doesn't have the features to be a complete solution

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Didn't know that. Thanks for the tidbit of lore. :)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

if that happens, people should migrate

Or better yet, they should just go ahead and do so right now. What's the point of picking Github over the other better alternatives anyway?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

(i agree entirely, but i have to accept a lot of people just go wherever the most users are)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a version control system, not social media!

I get that you're explaining it, not endorsing it, and so this criticism isn't directed at you, but the notion that people would pick Github over Gitlab or Codeburg because of the bandwagon effect is just dumb and weird.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I agree and also don't at the same time. It's coming from a genuine place of you get more driveby contributions on Github than you do Gitlab or Codeberg, but at the same time, people will ultimately go where the projects are, and I think the more open source code we host on Codeberg the more users we'll get on Codeberg, and the more Codeberg users we get the more driveby contributions projects will get on Codeberg. Like I get where an individual project is coming from preferring Github over Codeberg, BUT where we are currently where everyone is preferring Github over codeberg is ultimately just us strangling ourselves. I think when Microsoft bought GitHub and a lot of projects moved to Codeberg, and then again when Microsoft started pushing Copilot hard... IDK, I guess what I'm getting at is WHAT IS THE HOLD UP PEOPLE! Move your projects to Codeberg! And when you're looking for solutions to problems you're having, look on Codeberg first. For one thing, it's actually lowkey nicer to use at this point, and it does have enough traction that you should get enough driveby contributions to be worth your while

[–] Arkouda 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I find it weird that one can sign in to codeberg with a github account.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

I was not aware of that! Hopefully it encourages drivebys!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Gitlab was created by a ukranian and dutch developer originally but today Gitlab stock is traded on Nasdaq and its HQ is listed as San Francisco (wikipedia). I use it selfhosted but I don't think gitlab.com can be seen as European anymore.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

I think you might be right for the simple reason that (based on that same source and my presumption of their names ) all the C* people seem to be American as well.

[–] stardust 14 points 11 hours ago

Dammit really need to stop setting up HQs in US. It's the same for archive.org and wikipedia.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I had no idea that Gitlab was Ukrainian.

makes sense why it "just fucking works", unlike github.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Is this like that meme about houseplants and potatoes?

Github - aww, someone called out API too much I guess I'll just die

Gitlab - I am in a fucking warzone and you don't see that stopping me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

You mean a company with deep ties to Elon Musk's biggest personal enemy Sam Altman?

No way. I'm sure it will be fine, just like the CDC website

[–] [email protected] 67 points 13 hours ago

Good to see people taking "information demands to be free" seriously.

[–] Sunshine 7 points 11 hours ago

Hosting in Europe is the Cherry on top.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Can this be made into a .zim for Kiwix?