this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
227 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20665 readers
4001 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Republicans cannot meet their budget target without major cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Their budget plan requires $880 billion in cuts, but with Medicare excluded, Medicaid makes up 93% of the available funds.

This puts Republicans in a bind between conservative hard-liners demanding cuts and moderates opposing reductions to essential health programs.

While Trump claims Medicaid will be untouched, Speaker Mike Johnson argues it has excessive fraud.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 hours ago

That was always the goal. This is how they sell it to aging boomers and rural voters depending on those programs.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How about instead of stripping all taxes from the rich we, y"know, fucken tax them?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 hours ago

I like them sliced and in a head basket. Tyvm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

CBO about to get fired

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Man I can only hope that if we even survive just one year of this lunacy, that we've smartened up by 2026 to get a majority of these clowns out. That's our honest and best chance right now.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You still think there would actually be real midterms, or even midterms at all, by now?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It’s Russian style elections from here on out, where the numbers are made up and the votes don’t matter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

And by here on out you mean since last November right ? The numbers don’t mean anything for a while now

[–] [email protected] 64 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Only consequential fraud is by medical corporations overcharging or scamming. Only going to get worse as they fire the auditors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean if Republicans really wanted to root out fraud they have a resident expert with first hand knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

If republicans want to root out fraud … as is often said “suicide is always an option”. That’d be the best way to both drain the swamp and root out corruption by republicans lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like the IRS, increasing funding to auditing services nets more savings than the input costs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

These people don't understand long term thinking. Cutting Medicaid will stop the poorest Americans from getting preventative care. This will massively increase the cost to the country when they have to go to the emergency room to try to have their life later on. Our taxes will pay those exorbitant bills.

I read that for every dollar in funding, the IRS brings in five dollars. But it's long term, so it's impossible for these fuckers to comprehend.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No shit? Glad it's "official," I guess, but literally anyone left with basic arithmetic skills and common sense knew that gutting fed workers wasn't going to even remotely be enough to make up $2 trillion. So many analysts had said as much all summer long when DOGE started being floated.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Not to mention the obviously rushed and dumbass way they're just wholesale firing is absolutely going to have hidden costs resulting from those agencies trying to make up for suddenly not having the ability to... do what they're supposed to.

I can save a lot of money now by never changing the oil in my car but later Im gonna pay out the ass cause I'm gonna have to pay to replace the whole engine because of it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

Dinglesmurf just fires people, and see's what happens. And then re-hires when stuff clearly goes to shit.

That's musk approach to everything. Even SpaceX.

Remove it, and see if it works without it. Consequences be damned.

Of course that doesn't take into account long term affects as you pointed out. It's idiotic and irresponsible.

With the FAA now gutted/gone. He's in the clear to do what he pleases. People will get hurt.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago

Yes they fucking can. They always could.

Imagine you run a business that takes a big job from some incorporated businesses. Now imagine at the end you find out you operated at a loss. Now imagine you agree to keep doing that job every fucking year WHILE TAKING EVEN LESS MONEY FOR DECADES.

If the GOP wants to run the government like a business then they need to start charging the rich their share of taxes.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 hours ago

Sounds like they're about to find some cost savings in the budget office.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

That was the point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Lies boosted by corporate news sewers.