this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
134 points (98.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3894 readers
892 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cecilkorik 7 points 6 days ago

Even if we don't have any, it doesn't matter. We could build them so quickly that we are considered a "paranuclear" state, with an estimated nuclear latency of about 3 days. We have all the technology and infrastructure we need already and we know exactly what we would need to do.

This is why anyone who considers invading us needs to consider Canada as a nuclear state, even Russia's "3 day special military operation" took a lot longer than 3 days -- and by that time we'd be expected to have nuclear weapons ready to retaliate with. They thought terrorists with nuclear weapons were scary, imagine what Canadian resistance insurgents would do with them. Last time we were in a war we burned the white house down. This time we'll have nukes. The Canadian occupation is going to last a very long time and be a very dangerous project for an invader.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The vast majority of America is learning what we history nerds figured out a while ago. There are two versions of the Canadian “sorry”:

  • genuine, polite, and accommodating
  • cheeky, with a wink and a nod, whilst spattered with blood, after just doing something that’s going to be specifically added to the Geneva convention, because they found a loophole while fighting fascists and mainlining maple syrup
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

because they found a loophole while fighting fascists

This is the best case scenario too, don't look at the darker moments

Canucks scary

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

For real, they do not fuck around when they get riled. And we rilin’ them up. This cannot end well for us unitedstatesians.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You think we have this many Tim Hortons because we like the coffee?? HAH.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

nah it's for the timbits

but also the silos.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Donut holes? Nope, warhead decoys.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

I've seen some suspiciously big "maple trees" up there. I can believe this.

[–] ininewcrow 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Excuse me, but ummmm, sorry ... but Canadian ICBM eh?

Incredible
Care
Beyond
Measure

[–] ImplyingImplications 6 points 1 week ago

And don't you forget it, pal.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Balloon boy??

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we had

Wait, where did they go?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

en route ~1500km south by air