this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

18397 readers
301 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I really like the convenience of using fingerprint unlock for lockscreen and password manager. I do however don't like the thought of being forced to unlock both physically.

I use Android with GrapheneOS.

I have set up lockdown, but it takes some time to hold the power button and then click lockdown.

Any creative solutions?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Disable biometrics.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Ether way the new American government will threaten you with your family's death until you gave them the password

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

On stock android you can use one factor to unlock the main profile, such as pin

And a second factor to unlock the work profile such as fingerprint.

This way any app in the work profile has two factor protection.

As others have mentioned GOS let's you specify two factor unlocking. https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/18585-2-factor-fingerprint-unlock-feature-is-now-fully-implemented/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Don't use biometrics, they are less secure because the code is your finger or face and not a password in your head

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just don't setup the biometrics. It's convenient for you, but also anyone wanting to get in your phone. Just stick to passwords.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you care about privacy, don’t use biometrics.

It is sad because it is less convenient, but that’s what’s up.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah just don't use biometrics.

Odds of me getting arrested or stopped and interrogated and involuntary made to unlock my phone are near zero, but I still use a pattern to unlock. IMO pattern is most secure, because it cant easily be described verbally like a pincode, and it gets harder to do the more confused I am, so smacking me round the head or isolation and sleep deprivation would not improve my chances of accidentally describing the pattern. Note that I'm not an activist, criminal, reporter or political adversary, and I live in a very safe and democratic country so the likelihood of these things happening is very slim, but I still put a big emphasis on opsec when it comes to my technology.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A French scientist en route to a conference in Texas was detained upon his arrival at the airport, his phone unlocked and the poor bloke was sent hone without his phone and his computer because apparently he had written bad things about the current president on social media...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I heard of many recent border stories, but this one really sounds like an oppressive regime.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

always lockdown your phone when going through customs. Take backups of your electronics before going to hostile countries, or consider bringing an old phone as a burner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

patterns and pins can be watched over shoulder though.

[–] cyborganism 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I heard somewhere that authorities can't ask you for a PIN but can ask you for a pattern because of the way the law is written.

I'd love for someone to confirm that though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Oh they can ask, but in certain conditions, my memory gets really bad...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Graphene can do both at the same time: fingerprint+password/pin as the second factor. This won't stop someone from holding you at gunpoint, but at least it would stop cops (in some cases)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It does? How do you set it up?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Under Fingerprint Unlock -> Second Factor Pin

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Not showing up for me, did they only add it recently?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

And then the fingerprint scan fails 😵

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Lots of great answers. For iOS lemmy people, you can just press up volume and power button at same time to disable biometrics

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Since you're on grapheneos you could always set up the 2 factor unlock when using biometrics. You would then unlock your phone using fingerprint and a pin. This way even if you're forced to unlock the device they'd still need your secondary pin to unlock. The pin can be much shorter than your main password so its still fast to unlock.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Wow ty , had mine off for unlocking screen since i got this phone , wasnt visible until i turned on unlock with fingerprint :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

wow I've been waiting for this feature on smartphones.... feels like been waiting for centuries!

thank you for bringing this up!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Its built in in GOS. And duress pin as well. Best middleground for security, you can still use fingerprint for apps.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In stock android 15 it looks like this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Seems it found its way there as well then. Think it was a GOS thing on 14

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

As others have said, the most secure option is to not use biometrics.

However an app like private lock might be a decent compromise

Edit: I just noticed that private lock seems to not have a new release in a few years and should probably be considered orphaned. So I might recommend ParanoidsPal-PrivacyLock instead

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Requirements - Device admin permission for locking screen.

Does this mean it requires root access (which brings additional security concerns) or just that a non-restricted user needs to set it up?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't require root. Device admin is different.

I currently run this app on android 15 without root and it runs very well. However I just noticed that it seems to not have a new release in a few years and should probably be considered orphaned. So I might recommend ParanoidsPal-PrivacyLock instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Good to know, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Great app, just installed it. The default amount of movement is perfect. Now it's really easy to prevent being physically forced to unlock, and theft

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I use Paranoid's Pal, a similar app. It's great. In addition to locking in response to motion, I have it set to automatically lock the phone a few minutes after the screen turns off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

automatically lock the phone a few minutes after the screen turns off

Isn't the default behaviour of phones to lock as soon as the screen turns off?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

You can set your phone to do that, of course, but I prefer not to have to unlock mine when I've just used it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Im not an android dev but I think the difference here is it's a secure lock. Which means that encryption is engaged and requires the decryption string to unlock which means that biometrics are not asked for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Mine doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

This also seems nice. I'll probably test this one as well. I like the lock after x amount of time feature. The pictures have max 15 minutes, so that might be too little, but maybe it'll work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't this basically the same as Android's theft detection lock?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, you could use the wrong finger. After 3 attempts, my GrapheneOS install brings up the password field, but you can go back to the lock screen and try 2 more times until it locks out of fingerprint unlock (so 5 times total). You could always hold the power button down while it's in your pocket or bag, pretending you are searching for the phone or something, and then lock it down as soon as you lift the screen up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just... dont use biometrics for device unlock?? You can still use it for apps separate from device unlock

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course I can do this, but that is a major inconvenience when I unlock my phone hundreds of times per day.

[–] cyborganism 8 points 2 days ago

Welp. A small inconvenience is the price to pay if you want privacy from the authorities.

I keep telling friends and family to switch browsers, switch text messengers, even switch social networks and they just complain that it's all just inconveniences. But then they complain about their privacy.

C'mon.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Carry a lighter to remove your fingerprints if captured?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn they can unlock phones with toothprints??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t get this thread… if you’re captured they can ask for anything

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And in many circumstances you can choose/have a right not to answer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I would imagine you also have the right not to act

Else... they can just force you to enter the code the same way as they can force you to put your finger on the screen... or force you to look at the screen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How long does lockdown take for you?
It takes me less than 2 seconds (i checked).

load more comments
view more: next ›