this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
351 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23061 readers
3188 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 day ago

It's not just Kilmar, there's been several other reports of international visitors being detained for no reason, like this Canadian who was detained for 12 days. No, I'd rather not chance spending my vacation in jail for no reason, thanks.

[–] phoenixz 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll visit California when it's a province of Canada

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you really want our population doubled that quickly? Keep in mind 50% of our country would now basically be Americans.

No thanks.

[–] SpaceCowboy 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah people keep saying California should be a province of Canada which is ridiculous. Why not suggest something that's plausible?

California should be it's own country. It's got a higher population than Canada and a much larger economy. They'd no longer need to continue subsidizing states that are happy when the guy they put into power denies them emergency aid in a disaster. They could have their own emergency relief fund they'd administer themselves, and they could set their own immigration policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The UP would defect first I think, but after that it’d be Vermont then maybe Maine, and the rest of Michigan if the auto industry collapses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Pacific States of America

I would also accept the answer

California and Cascadia

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

It's gotta keep the name California somewhere in the title. California's name probably has the coolest etymology out of any US state.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We would be open to trade with an independent California.

[–] SpaceCowboy 3 points 1 day ago

Hell I'd be open to an EU style organization between Canada, California, and any other state that secedes because they prefer democracy over fascism.

It's funny that Trump says Canada isn't a viable country because he's making the USA into non-viable country. The hatred in the red states towards states like California was kinda there already, but he's just fanning those flames. It seems various regions of the US are forming into distinct cultures with very different values. Maybe the US is just too big to be sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They can be like puerto rico and just don‘t get any representation in major parts of the government.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

You had me at...

Canadians Reject Gavin Newsom

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gavin Newsom can go fuck himself. Sorry fellas, we don't want to give you our money anymore.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, no, you're good. Speaking as a Californian, Gavin absolutely can go fuck himself. He's the crown prince of shitlibs, he's like if you distilled Nancy Pelosi, the whole Hillary campaign, Mitt Romney, and Obama's second term into one person; of course his first concern is for tourism numbers. Please, stay home and stay safe; we've got to get this shit sorted.

[–] Tiger666 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And he is still better than trump. Lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I guess? The democrats rolled the dice with the "yeah, they're a wet fart, but even a wet fart is better than Trump" strategy twice now and lost everybody's ass both times. I would really prefer we not test it a third time and actually run an exciting candidate that actually motivates people to vote for them and not against Trump.

[–] besselj 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was there last year. It’s worse than ever. Expensive as fuck and designed to wear you down and open your wallets more. There was one really good ride and managed to see that. Had to pay extra on top of admission to ride it though. Per person.

The other big ticket item crapped out halfway through and the group of us in there ended up getting things to come back and try again later (after waiting in line for 30 mins) since it broke.

Honestly, it’s not the same as when I was a kid. The magic is gone.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Do you mean to tell me that the compulsion to squeeze people for every dime they have has ruined Disney? Damn that's hard to believe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Which rides specifically?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Disney world will be worse.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

SiL is going with her kids, I told her to wipe her phone, she didn't take it seriously, hopefully they don't get turned around after landing because she's the kind of person that will make a huge scene and get detained...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Imagine that. A reason to go to Disneyland Paris.

Wait. Tokyo Disneyland exists. Never mind.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Nah boycott Disney as well

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

The state government needs to start putting together a plan to protect us from abduction.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good

As California Gov. Gavin Newsom rolled out a lawsuit Wednesday challenging Trump’s sweeping tariffs, he had little to say about the Abrego Garcia case when asked about it.

“This is the distraction of the day. The art of distraction,” Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, said of Trump invoking MS-13 to justify his actions. “And here, we zig and zag. This is the debate they want. This is their 80-20 issue, as they’ve described it.”

While noting that the government needs to abide by court orders and the rule of law, Newsom added, “It’s exactly the debate they want, because they don’t want this debate on the tariffs; they don’t want to be accountable to markets today.”

(archived)

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ, Newsom, they put people in jail indefinitely with 0 due process, they aren't even charged with a crime! That's a little more urgent than the fucking tariffs!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That dude is completely focused on attacking the "real" threats: trans and unhoused people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Pfft, he's just some guy distracting people from what's important: rich people are making slightly less money! Sound the alarm!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Not for the billionaire class, and they own the politicians.

Remember: he does not fight the tariffs to save ordinary peoples jobs or lower prices on supermarket shelves. He does this to protect the profits of the rich.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. Nazis opening up concentration/death camps in a foreign country and illegally shipping people off there without any semblence of due process (not that it would be legal even with due process, as death camps are illegal under the 8th amendment, not that this government cares)? Clearly that's just meant as a distraction from what the Nazis really want to do, which are tarrifs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He's just a slimey asshole who is avoiding the question. He wants to try and keep some conservative votes when he's forced on everyone by the DNC in a couple of years, as they backstab another candidate that would actually improve things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's unbelievable how stupid these people are. They learned anything from Kamala losing by chasing the far right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he gets the nomination in 2028 then we're beyond royally fucked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

We already are.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do wonder how many Helens agree...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As long as it's not about promptness I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Then it’s only 29 Helens.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Go binge watch all of Kids in the Hall and get back to us

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

oh dope, ty for tip

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

One day Jerboa will support basic things like gifs

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

newsom is already democrats' preordained 2028 nominee.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he was until he hosted right wingers on a podcast.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

He is BECAUSE he hosted right wingers on his podcast.

[–] mr_stevenson_ii 5 points 1 day ago

I would never let anything happen to you

I could not think of a suitable Gavin line, unfortunately.