this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
410 points (100.0% liked)

News

28850 readers
4655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US plane manufacturer Boeing has begun flying 737 Max jets that were refused by Chinese airline customers back to the United States, as the trade war between the world’s two biggest economies escalates.

Bloomberg reported earlier this week that China had instructed airlines to stop taking delivery of Boeing jets.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Alright Boeing, we know you have assassins for killing people in the way of your profits, where are they at?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They're probably not on staff and hiring them externally just got much more expensive and complicated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Gig work really is killing the job market.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fall of boeing is all in all a good thing for the US. These too big to fail companies are a severe liability.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who says they're going to fail?

The machine to have taxpayers eat the cost of those planes is already grinding away. They probably won't be used, likely sit somewhere and decay, but we'll pay for them.

The whole point of too big to fail is you get bailed out when you start to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

They wont because they will get enough welfare to be propped up until they screw up and start to fail again.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I'm sure donvict is an economic GENIUS and not at all a Russian asset.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

thanks donald for helping european manufacturers sell more planes. airbus ftw.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I guess they will have to roll with their Comac C919 in order to please Party Officials.

Also Airbus doesn't have the capacity to deliver new planes quickly right now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Mega? ......Hell even that sounds way cooler ...MEGA!

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Aren’t these the planes that were grounded due the multiple crashes?

That might be a reason why they don’t want them.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

If that were the issue they would have canceled the orders several years ago. Refusing the planes at this point is due to more recent developments.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago

It is, but that’s not the reason here (even if not buying a 60 years airframe with shit avionics and too low ground clearance is a valid reason).

Most Asian orders are for bigger aircrafts, so 777 and 787 for Boeing.

And even without tariffs retaliation from China, Boeing is fucked because of tariffs. An aircraft is 90% imported parts from all over the world. Airbus is the same, but Airbus is not in the US (well, they have an A320 line there for US market but they can close it and keep working with the rest of the world from Europe, Boeing can’t do that)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They fixed the MCAS issue a while back. It now requires data from multiple sensors, is only able to activate once per flight, and has a dramatically reduced strength on that one activation.

Mentour Pilot did great videos about the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines incidents that go into detail about that system and its flaws.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s not about fixing that one defect.

It’s about the degradation of their safety culture and engineering rigor to the point that they were just blithely ignoring regulatory requirements that are written in blood. Management overrode TONS of engineers, assemblers, and QC techs in the interest of shipping shit and making money. This also happened in the 787. This also happened in the starliner capsule. I’m sure it’s happening elsewhere. Boeing can no longer be trusted to reliably and safely build things - it’s that bad.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny, they told us it was all because of DEI...

Big /S

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was because of Milton Friedman:

The sole objective, and only social responsibility, of corporate governance is to maximize shareholder value.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

It's a trade action. They want them, and need them. Airbus and Boeing are the main, by far, manufacturers of medium and large passenger jets, and they are back ordered until the 2030's. But Boeing jets are some of the most expensive per unit US items you can use as bargaining chips.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

China was the first country to ground them..

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Hahaha LMAO stupid trump and maga morons

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Will Boeing have to pay 245% tariffs on re-importing them?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

They don't have to pay anything, they're not buying them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

No, assuming that they weren't worked on any further and are being returned as-exported. Even if they weren't originally US made, you've got three years from US export to claim duty relief (assuming you paid the duties when they came into the US first time round).

https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/entry-summary/hts-subheading-9801

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Boeing_737_MAX_orders_and_deliveries

Boeing has 4,763 MAX aircraft in its backlog as of March 31, 2025.

Well, I assume that some other customer isn't going to complain about their plane being available earlier than scheduled.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Airlines usually customize the engines, avionics, galley, toilets, cabin interior, seat configuration, in-flight entertainment, etc.

Just because they're bringing the aircraft back, doesn't mean they get to ship them out to other waiting customers ASAP.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

It's not usually Boeing that does the interior btw, and is usually done after delivery by a third party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s called option, not customization.

You can’t put a huge ass spoiler on your 737 to have it stick better to the ground, and it will go back down anyway.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You can’t put a huge ass spoiler on your 737 to have it stick better to the ground

Just to “um akshually” a bit because I found this fascinating when I learned about it ages ago.

A spoiler on a car doesn’t help it stick to the ground better. Rather it “spoils” air, reducing drag and allowing air to flow around the car better. Like damming up the air between the roof and the spoiler, allowing other air to just flow from the roof to the spoiler. This means there isn’t a vacuum created behind the cabin, so you have less turbulent air and less drag.

A wing on a car increases drag, and forces the car down to the ground by creating lift (though since the wing is upside down compared to a plane, we call this lift “downforce”).

We often use the terms “spoiler” and “wing” interchangeably when referring to cars, but they’re very different beasts!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Til, that is fascinating. Thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, airplanes have spoilers!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Also yes! And they’re very important!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So spoilers suck? Or they suck less?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Not if it coincides with a recession and drop in passenger numbers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Well I assume the other airlines will inspect the Airplane rigorously when they know someone else already refused delivery for it, because they don't want a shitty lemon

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What would have they done with only the back of the plane anyway?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

These are all those planes where the front fell off.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

If you put them together you can fly both ways. Round trip.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I see what you did there Dad

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

If they’re going cheap I’ll take one