this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
101 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

9554 readers
867 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Conservative victory over the Liberals in the Canadian election could lead to nearly 800m extra tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over the next decade, according to Carbon Brief analysis.

This amounts to the entire annual emissions of the UK and France combined.

These extra emissions would cause around C$233bn ($169bn) in climate damages around the world, based on the Canadian government’s official costings.

The right-leaning Conservative party, led by Pierre Poilievre, has pledged to cut one of the nation’s most significant climate policies – industrial carbon pricing – as well as other key regulations.

If these policies are removed and not replaced, modelling by researchers from Simon Fraser University and University of Victoria shows that Canada’s gradually declining emissions would likely start to creep up again in the coming years.

In contrast, emissions would continue to fall under the policies currently backed by Mark Carney’s centre-left Liberal party, which has overseen a modest decrease over the past decade.

However, Carbon Brief analysis of the modelling also suggests that neither of the major parties’ policy platforms would put Canada on track to reach any of its climate targets.

These figures complement analysis by the Canadian government showing that the nation still needs to implement more ambitious measures in order to reach its target to cut emissions to net-zero by 2050.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 58 minutes ago

After all the shit happening to US, I am surprised u guys still have conservative party wow

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This is probably true, but conservatives think climate change is either not anthropogenic or perfectly fine actually, so unfortunately I'm not sure anyone cares that isn't already voting liberal/NDP/green.

[–] floofloof 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The main thing we need is for people who don't want Conservatives to actually get out and vote. There's more potential in the swing from nonvoter to voter than in the swing between Conservative and other parties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, please go vote!

[–] Punchshark 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

CANADA DOESNT NEED A SMALL ~pp~

[–] avidamoeba 4 points 4 hours ago

The only correct answer.

[–] recursive_recursion 4 points 4 hours ago

Actually the conservatives would add 800m extra tonnes by 2027 based on how it looks in the states