this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
189 points (95.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4016 readers
986 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 18 hours ago

The documentary piece called Ace Combat 7 told me that jets would win.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Well, no but actually yes. See the countless videos of people in Ukraine flying a DJI into a Russian airbase and just dropping fucking grenades on planes.

Also, consider:

  • We already have military drones that are practically fully automated, and we had our first fully autonomous kill decision five years ago now.

  • DARPA did some tests with an AI piloted fighter jet in 2022, it successfully killed all human enemy jets 5/5 times.

  • The weakest part of an air superiority platform is the squishy meatbag flying it. Without having to worry about keeping a human alive, you can make air superiority fighters that are vastly more capable with high-g maneuvering and more compact air frames.

Now, Elon's not talking about air superiority drones, he's talking about drone swarms. Drone swarms ARE a real threat, but AFAIK they're more of an infrastructure threat in that they're usually worried about in the context of disabling ships, airports, etc. not individual fighter jets. For that, you get Vadim to tie a grenade to his DJI.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

I have one piece of Military classified tech that makes every plane useless. New war is never going to use drones or planes or they will lose everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

It's an anime sword, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

It has the power of god and anime inside of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

The weakest part of an air superiority platform is the squishy meatbag flying it.

Only true of 4th Gen jets. 5th Gen doesn't need as high maneuverability. If they did, you'd see further developments in combat drugs and water breathing suits.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

New weapons almost never replace old ones, they supplement. Drones aren't going to replace piloted jets, but they can absolutely supplement them in the form of wingmen. Drones won't replace artillery, guided missiles or grenades, but they will replace SOME of them.

A drone swarm will never replace a jet, but it might replace some artillery bombardments.

[–] softcat 57 points 23 hours ago

The trick is to use the drone while the plane is sleeping in the hangar

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There is a lot more improvement that can be made to drones (Coordination, guidance, speed, etc) and advancement in battery technology seems fairly inevitable

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Unless the improvements include making them fly at the same speed and height as fighter jets I'm not seeing the endgame.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They don't have to be faster, they just need to be in front of the fighter jets and small enough that they can't be seen until too late

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Elon is just dishing out the same Russian talking points as Pierre Sprey. Updated to acknowledge Ukraine. High tech weapons could never defeat Russian ingenuity.

Of course they want to talk about the massive impact of drones! Distracts from the abysmal performance of Russia's military. If these grifters were actually just neutral observers amused at military incompetence, they don't have to look to the future. Aug'22 has enough unforced error anecdotes to last a lifetime.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ehhhh, drones have meaningfully transformed the battlefield. It's why trench warfare came back; basically every inch of the battlefield is under constant surveillance. The instant a large number of people jump up out of a trench, some drone operator is talking to an artillery crew. You'd best believe that our intelligence and defense apparatus was taking extensive notes. Emphasis on was.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Oh don't worry, Russia will happily sell their sabotaged notes

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

But how do you get the crewed aircraft to hold still long enough?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think we are going to be getting to a point where signal jamming is going to become a more critical part of warfare. A military base isn't going to allow any kind of transmission to occur nearby in order to protect itself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This is why laser targeting is a thing. Cant jam a laser beam.

[–] humanspiral 1 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

fiber optic drones (spool of fiber optic cable gets video signal from drone, and sends commands) is unjammable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

Great way to paint yourself

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

smoke barriers has entered the discussion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

slight breeze counters your defence

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Drones could act as automated movable flack. Just get a bunch to get near the flight path and explode. There are definitely drones with a range way over 1 mile.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

Or put some pieces of high-carbon steel/titanium on the drone and just let them get sucked into the intake.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The range needed could be 30.000 feet ...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

the US arguably lost the VN war because they kept expecting the VK to fight like the US

why would you try to counter the jet at 30k feet?

a jet takes so long to build and so much to maintain the supply chain is super vulnerable

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Making a cloud of drone flak is very cheap and easy and can take out multiple types of threats. They talk to each other and act as a redundant pinpoint targeting system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 59 minutes ago

Boom a cheap EMP blast takes out all your 700 drones.

It's a never ending battle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

what kind of up time do they have

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

I imagine a drone built for this could be an hour or two as some return to charge periodically on specific areas under protection.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago (12 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago

Thank you for the mnemonic.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Easy. One mile is 1609.34 meters. One meter is 3.28 feet. 1609.34 times 3,28 is 5278,63.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So you just need about six drones to reach the necessary altitude..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Only if 5 of the drones have little arms to control the next one in the chain

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There are probably models that can act as repeaters. Isn't the 1 mile range for fiber optic wired ones? You can control a drone by satellite if you want to.

Does anybody here actually think drone swarms aren't the future?

[–] rbos 2 points 21 hours ago

Some fibre drones have a range of 10km and that can only go up, I think. It's crazy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

It's probably not the replacement for everything else though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

Doesn't it also depend on how long the mile is?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Clearly at speed or altitude the aircraft should be safe, but it is vulnerable on the ground, at take off and landing. Obviously there are counter measures. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-65591023

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Jets are usually most vulnerable on the ground. This is another attack profile the air field defenses will need to guard against, along with cruise missiles, stealth bombers, hypersonic missiles, and many more.

load more comments
view more: next ›