this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
207 points (96.0% liked)

World News

46333 readers
4667 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Is this the speedboat equivalent of doing a wheelie across the finish line on a bike?

Glad they’re ok.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Admittedly, I don't know much about modern speedboats, but the full flip probably saved their lives. In the old days, flipping onto your head at damn near 200 mph was certain death.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yea that flip and rotation definitely saved them, you can see in the video they slow down drastically in the air while the top of the boat was pointing mostly forward, although they likely also experienced some drastic gforce changes as it happened.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was gonna say, did the pilot live?

Good number of hydroplane/powerboat deaths/maimings over the years...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Both lived and were not seriously injured.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And that is what I would describe as the only kind of miracle I believe can actually happen.

Roughly on par with 'bailed out of an airplane, crashed through some trees, landed in a snowbank, only suffered a few fractures and actually lived.'

Something like that happened a few times in WW2.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These guys wore safety gear and were strapped in. Read tha article

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He described the relief of seeing both people on board the boat pop open the hatch. “Oh my gosh, it’s just a miracle,” Ticknor said.

Ticknor being the event organizer.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=sSl2846EPl4

The pilots suffered multiple fractures, including a broken knee.

I'd call a broken knee alone a serious injury...

Had their injuries been more serious, they may have been unable to escape the sinking boat.

Had the boat landed in a different orientation, or done a different, completely undpredictable, uncontrolled aerial manuever, such that it impacted the water with more speed, the boat could have broken apart on landing or become structurally comprised much more seriously, and thus the pilots would be sinking much more rapidly, likely with more serious injuries.

Though this boat and its safety cage performed admirably in terms of structural stability... similar crashes to this have maimed and killed a good number of folks in the history of hydroplane/powerboat events.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

200 mph (322kph)

Everything but metric.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

kph is just a stupid way of saying km/h

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Am I missing something here? KPH is metric.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Americans hate metric so much that they'd rather use metric!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"kph" is an americanization. the unit is km/h. i'm assuming the commenter did not know this since the first abbreviation is not used it most languages.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Fair enough. I Googled it just to double-check before posting, but Google isn't going to tell you whether terminology is regionally correct or not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe this is an SI purist and want to see meters per second or nothing? That would be silly because KPH is well used across the metric world, of course

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

yeah, but the US is one of the only country in the world that writes it as kph. most countries write it as km/h. Which can be confusing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And a 'significant figures' failure too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (7 children)

k, it's time to wind down the whole we're-just-burning-fossil-fuels-for-fun stuff now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

A lot of these racing applications are what drive innovations in power and efficiency in the rest of the automotive field since they're constantly improving engines to squeeze as much power out of them as they can. Banning this stuff will have little to no impact on pollution and just needlessly piss a bunch of people off, driving allies away from the cause.

It's like the whole plastic straw ban that achieved nothing and made a bunch of people look like fools. Meanwhile, giant corporations are packaging items in single-use plastic packaging and using 10,000x as much plastic with nary a peep from those politicians' grandstanding over straws. Furthermore, every paper straw I've ever gotten has been wrapped in a plastic bag.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

i doubt the actual motorsports are the biggest carbon emissions of stuff like this

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Running boats like this for 10 seconds costs nothing compared to a mega yacht.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Check out SailGP. It's got some flaws, but they did actually manage to design a sailboat race that goes fast enough to actually be interesting to watch in real-time.

flaws

  • I have my doubts that it's as eco-friendly as they claim, since they still use fossil fuels for support boats, shipping the sailboats across the world between events, etc.
  • It's pretty new and seems a little underfunded, so the production values and commentating can be a bit rough around the edges.
  • They try to make it accessible (e.g. by reporting speeds in kph instead of knots), but it's still got a whiff of yacht-club elitism to it.
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, i'm certainly ok with a fully electric motorboat

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What do you do if you run out of electricity while out on the water? At least with an EV you can get out and walk but that's a different story on a boat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Same what you do when your boat runs out of gasoline? Doesn't matter what powers your engine if you don't watch your tank or battery level you will have a problem.

Apart from that: This is about racing boats. They're never alone somewhere on the open sea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

"STOP HAVING FUN!!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

What's a crash win?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

There were two seoarate incidents. Mark Webber and another guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Eh, anyone can do that mid-air. It takes skill to do it quarter-air.

/s

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sadly, they didn't win the Darwin award. There's always next year.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Were these terrible people or are you just wishing death on random people for making a poor choice for their own safety?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They were being reckless... to win the award, that's all it takes. Evolution takes its course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Not terrible people. At least the owner / one of the operators is a pretty awesome man.

[–] ininewcrow 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess these guys have never heard of ground effect or air compressing at high speed.

I'm guessing none of them want to admit to these effects if you want to keep a propeller in the water the whole time.

[–] Undearius 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those effects are key to the design of these boats. They're essentially a wing.

Water has a lot more drag than air, so the more the boat is out of the water, the faster it can go.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Though it makes me wonder why they don't use actual wings to maintain control over the boat when it goes too far out of the water. Why isn't the ideal basically a plane that has a propeller sticking down into the water?

load more comments
view more: next ›