this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
462 points (99.8% liked)

politics

23472 readers
3165 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has attended only 12 intelligence briefings in his first 100+ days of his second term, a steep decline from his already infrequent briefing schedule during his first presidency, POLITICO reports.

He began 2025 with just two in-person updates monthly, shifting to weekly in April.

Critics, including Sen. Mark Warner, say Trump’s disengagement endangers national security, as he also avoids reading detailed briefing materials.

His national security team is in turmoil, and recent cuts to CIA DEI programs have sparked fears of institutional regression and increased vulnerability to global threats.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Unironically probably for the best, anything top secret he would learn in those meetings would be in the hands of his autocratic handlers before the meeting was concluded.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago

He's too demented to understand them anyway. He wouldn't care even if he could.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

That's optimistic. The handlers are probably still at (or even orchestrating) the briefings.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, at this point I'd be willing to bet that those officials who actually still give half a shit about national security don't give Trump anything that isn't essentially public information already. Or at the very least, largely harmless if it does become public. It's not like Trump would know or care about the difference.

Remember that multiple sources have said that during his first term, the Presidential Daily Briefings were largely little more than fluff pieces with pretty pictures, easy to understand words, and random references to him just to keep his attention, much like trying to keep a 3 year old occupied with a coloring book and a handful of crayons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

he was like this his first term too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not sure, he is probably getting his intelligence from Russia at this point

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

his krasnov: briefing for the week, is ignore all other intelligence briefing from the us, and allies, and also shout "my putins talking points" once a while to make noise and distract the news.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Which really runs against the "Everything Trump does is actually Russia!" line that gets posted around here incessantly. There's nothing Putin would want more than to have access to those briefings, but his useful idiot is too much of an idiot to be useful here. Trump is on Putin's side, sure, but most of what he does, especially in this term, is the result of home-grown American authoritarianism, not orders from Russia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would Putin need Trump to pass that sort of thing along anymore? That's literally Tulsi Gabbard's job, passing along info the Putin.

She was literally a known Russian spy even before the got confirmed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Would you trust Trump to accuratly repeat what he heard?

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Wait, I got one!

Let's see... Trump. Intelligence. Trump lacking intelligence...

Nah, I got nothing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm certain that his cronies are relieved when he doesn't show up. They are executing project 2025 according to plan. He just gets in the way with his ego.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Or… they’re just saying, “don’t worry Mr. President. We’re doing all the work… you just keep foaming those MAGA’s mouths; and we’ll win.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah, and it shows.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

We have no intelligence!

[–] JohnnyCanuck 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I wouldn't say I've been missing them, Bob."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

PC load letter? the fuck does that mean?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He doesn't need to attend to pass on the important stuff to Vlad. Tulsi does that for him now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Tulski*

Call her by her birth name.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

Intelligence has skipped Trump since the beginning…

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

If he were to attend, wouldn't it be an "Intelligence + 1 guest" briefing?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

Never seems to miss the Stupidity Briefings, though.

[–] KingPorkChop 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's time for Canada to detach from NORAD, and get our own nukes.

They don't even have to be long range ICBMs.

I don't trust these fuckers any more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not a good idea for Canada. Canada is not able to handle logistics, nor the cost of running Northern defense.

Solidify national security, solidify international agreements, then re-evaluate insider divorce.

[–] KingPorkChop 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have an unstable ex living below us. If Canada were to be invaded, the US wouldn't come to our aid. They would drag their feet and demand 75% of our natural resources before considering coming to the table. And since Trump can't keep a promise or a trade deal, he can not be trusted to flip on a deal any moment. The USA is NOT our friend.

We need nukes.

We need them yesterday.

We need to fortify the southern border.

We need a larger military budget.

Trump is already talking about making Canada part of the USA. We're living next to a serious threat right now. The USA is a failing country slipping into an authoritative regime. We need to deal with it RIGHT NOW.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Everything you said in a correct, but it will take time.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

Best news in a while.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

He should hire Obama to go to intelligence briefings in his place

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I imagine that Trump feels like he doesn't need them. He's just going to wing it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

And Nero chose to play a fiddle.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Well, "intelligence" hadn't featured so far, so this shouldn't be a surprise...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Everything is going according to plan for Krasnov.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Trump during intelligence briefing:
"I'll close my eyes a bit while you are talking, so I can better concentrate on what you are saying, carry on..."

"rrrrr rrrr rrrrr"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Of course, they contradict his delusional world view.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

We've known for a while that he only cares if they're about him. The CIA is running out of ideas to shoehorn his name into the text.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Well, he's not an intelligent person, so...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

i bet he does this with his lips everytime hes in a briefing, moving his fingers quickly up and down on a duck lips.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love this man('s incompetence as the leader of American imperialism).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but there’s also the intelligence concerning Russian and Chinese aggression. Not that that would matter to him, now that he’s making the US an aggressor too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

now that he’s making the US an aggressor too.

... Now? The US has been an aggressor for a good eighty years at this point. The only thing Trump is doing different is that he's pissing off white people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He’s actively being aggressive to allies, now. Big(ger) difference. Before there may have been overt trade negotiation in favor of the US, now there’s active trade aggression and talks of possible military force if needed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

He’s actively being aggressive to allies, now. Big(ger) difference.

Who almost all happen to be white people. My point is that to the vast majority of the planet, Trump's bullying is how America always acts. Trump is just bringing that to the people who thought they'd always be on the evil empire's good side, and their response to that is to hypocritically cry about the monster they helped create. When you look at the wider world, the US is as evil and domineering as it has always been.

load more comments (1 replies)