this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
150 points (87.5% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1800 readers
211 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing is that it’s not even really “socialism” that the Chinese guy is is complaining about here. He’s complaining about the authoritarian aspects of the Mainland Chinese government, which is not the same as socialism. And the fact that the tankie can’t understand that is just… I don’t even know what to do with it at this point.

[–] nova_ad_vitum 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The CCP's authoritarianism stems in part from their attempt to implement the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. The concept itself is pretty weird.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But it was never that, from the instant Mao gained any real hold on power in China. He subsumed the entire movement, and fundamentally corrupted it, in much the same way that Stalin did.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you gotta understand something about tankies: they think that's a good thing

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh, I know. It’s why I tilt at their windmills: to provide the counterpoint, in hopes that more susceptible people will see more than just the dogmatic Socialist Alternative hardliner viewpoint. Genuinely, I think those types do far more damage than they understand, especially in well-educated-median populaces such as Boston, when they bring their fucking Mao + Stalin silk screened Soviet flags to literally any fucking rally. If it pisses me off, as a person who’s very socialist and leaning even more so by the second, then I’m sure it’s alienating FAR more people than it’s calling to the banner.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

for sure! that shit pisses me off. for a lot of people those symbols of their oppressors. all those say to them are "pick a genocidal freak and get in line" when what most of us are communicating is "what if we didn't with genocidal freaks all the time?"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You put it way more succinctly than I did lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

How can someone corrupt what was made to be corrupt lol? Lenin and Engle's empowerment of the state against the proletariat could have never ended any other way. It's the same brain rot that right wing Libertarians espouse, just from the other side.

Out of control government, out of control businesses. It's the same picture.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I don't know much about the Chinese revolution/civil war, but it wasn't Stalin that turned Soviet Russia authoritarian; it was like that from the start. Stalin simply consolidated power within the already authoritarian framework of one-party rule. It could've been Zinoviev or Trotsky that came out on top and Soviet Russia would still have been an authoritarian hellhole. It might've been a better authoritarian hellhole or a worse authoritarian hellhole, but none of these guys were advocating for abolishing the Cheka (later the GRU) or holding new elections.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Notably, the dictatorship of the proletariat isn't meant to be an actual dictatorship. Marx saw feudalism as the dictatorship of the aristocracy, capitalism as the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, so by analogy socialism (or the prelude to it, at least) would be the dictatorship of the proletariat—rule by the people for the people. It's not meant to be a dictatorship in the way we use that term today.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

They brag about all the theory they've read. Even as they expose how bad their reading comprehension is. And they think it's a flex.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's amazing that so many people who claim to be socialists miss that despite Marx stating it pretty clearly in one of his shortest and most accessible (and widely read) works.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The dictatorship of the proletariat is just democracy. It's just the people getting to govern themselves instead of a select Elite few. There's really nothing weird about it, the weird thing is thinking that a small closed-knit group of authoritarian Elites can ever implement the dictatorship of the proletariat because by definition they are not the proletariat.

[–] nova_ad_vitum 5 points 1 week ago

It's not "just democracy" when it explicitly prescribes a one party state.

mandates the implementation of direct elections on behalf of and within the confines of the ruling proletarian state party

The democratic part is only within the ruling party, the one that claims to represent the proletariat.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 week ago (5 children)

the region where Hong Kong is

Can't even just say Hong Kong? Does that make us sound too independent or what?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

It is kind of sad since Hong Kong hasn't really been independent for years

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't they just say Shenzen then? That's also a huge city many people know, and it's on the mainland.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Mentioning Hong Kong means that China is weak

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

The socialist seapeoples are socialists too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (36 children)

An actually communist society where everybody has equal influence would be a direct democracy.

Authoritarianism is the enemy of the communist utopia the creators of the ideology dreamed about.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Authoritarianism is the enemy of the communist utopia the creators of the ideology dreamed about.

Can you give an example of this? I'm curious

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The inspiration of Communism came from the idea of Utopian Socialism, which is the free, equal, classless, moneyless utopian society that is the end goal of Communism.

An authoritarian state controlled by a dictator, like the ones .ml tankes worship, can never be classless, free, or equal.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yeah China produced more billionaires than the USA since the pandemic. Tankies go mum when this is brought up. This is hardly "classless and equal".

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

tankies seem wildly unaware of deng xiaoping's purge of maoism and leftism in China

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tankies on China are very much 'just trust me bro'

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

China is a state capitalist country. Russia is a capitalist country.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't like how they go around trying to convert people. They are honestly a lot like evangelicals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's no wonder they suck at "converting" people, they know nothing about how socialism works. Nevermind the fact that they see it as "converting" rather than just having an open discussion, I can almost guarantee these people will immediately swing around the "no actually soviet union was based" or "nono you dont understand, china was mega based they needed to starve out the population" in a discussion once they lose their patience. If you ever get a chance to talk to these people irl, try to have a convo about a stateless society. I can speak from personal experience, when you bring that up, their mind goes blank, and they will start to sound less like a communist and more like a right-winger.

These are the people that give socialism a bad rep.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

For them “socialism” is binary. Either it’s rampant authoritarian dystopia or modern capitalism.

They reject nuance and the varying levels of social policy that can be applied even to capitalist styles of governing.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (25 children)

I wonder why extremists hate liberals so much. They all talk of liberals with such disdain.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Liberalism is the old establishment. They want an extreme alternative to that. So of cause they do that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Liberals are capitalists first and foremost. Profit over human rights every time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's because they've written off the populists as worthless and instead focus on the PMC liberals who are prioritizing DEI over class. Liberals see themselves as being closer to the capitalists than the filthy poors.

The truth: populists are way easier to convert than liberals because their class interests are the same as yours. They've been told lefties have dumb priorities but if you come in saying "jobs and families matter more than bathroom drama" they're going to give you a chance.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The tankie would easily be able to convince their friend if they said China is never going to convert to communism, but communism was tried by lots of indigenous tribes and it worked great.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tankie is not an anarchist....

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Well there's the problem!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

It seems like they both agreed that there is no middle ground/compromise so they’ve got that going for them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I cheerfully install kitchen cabinets made by cheerful Vietnamese communists and then I tell the homeowners that they have helped to support a Marxist regime that was once oppressed by capitalist Americans.

load more comments
view more: next ›