this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
66 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

3016 readers
746 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The irony of China being the leader in new copyright rules!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Interesting take how the way they judged it is by generating more images using the same model and prompt.

The new images were to different from the originals. Concluding that there was not enough user input to claim an intended design.

Its possible that if a prompt was well designed to almost always provide the same user intended concept that this ruling was different.

An additional interesting note is that the company did first contact them to make a deal but the negotiations failed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The person was essentially trying to copyright a prompt.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Devils advocate (i am actually anti intellectual ownership).

How much words is the minimum for legal copyright? Because brand names and poems are.

I believe it might be possible however it wont exactly stop people from using the prompt. Results may be considered inspired rather then derivative.