Gandalf's large positive integers
Like that?
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Gandalf's large positive integers
Like that?
Oh wow. Do we have a lemmy community for that?
be the change you want to see!
I googled "Big Naturals". Result number 16 was this:
Should've been number 1.
This actually got a chuckle out of me. Prob the first number related joke I've laughed at.
big badonka-donkadonks
Why, would anyone at all think about something else?
/s
Actually, those are not the same. Natural numbers include zero, positive integers do not. She shoud definately use 'big naturals'.
Edit: although you could argue that it doesnt matter as 0 is arguably neither big nor large
Natural numbers only include zero if you define it so in the beginning of your book/paper/whatever. Otherwise it's ambiguous and you should be ashamed of yourself.
Natural numbers include zero
That is a divisive opinion and not actually a fact
Big naturals in fact include two zeroes:
(o ) ( o)
Spaces and parens added for clarity
When enclosed in parentheses I believe the correct term is "bolt-ons"
(0 ) ( 0)
You can't fool me.
(o Y o) solve for Y
Depends on how you draw it.
Also in an aqueous environment, they become floating point values.
Large nonnegative numbers*
If they're big the zero is skipped anyway
Just write it bigger.
Big Naturals Are More Pronounced
ftfy
I don't care if they're big, as long as they're real
I don't care if they're real, as long as I can manipulate them
Don't get me started on the unnatural and supernatural numbers.
Sound made up, like imaginary numbers.
I mean all numbers are made up when you think about it.
Also unrelated but natural numbers are closed under multiplication (by pure coincidence) while imaginary numbers are not.
This means natural numbers make worse examples when learning about sets.
Made me think of how everything is base 10, even octal or binary.
That's true OP, "big naturals" are indeed very pronounced.