this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
722 points (99.2% liked)

memes

15502 readers
5627 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I recall a Richard Feynman video where the interviewer asks him to explain how magnets work.

His answer amounts to "I can't explain that to you because if I gave you an accurate answer it would be too technical for it to make sense to you, and if I simplified it to the extent that you could understand, it would no longer be a meaningful answer."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

His point was that we don't understand the interaction between fundamental forces enough to say, if we were to try and answer the question accurately enough.

So, in one sense ICP was right that we don't know how magnets work. But also they were wrong that scientists be lying. They shouldn't have been pissed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (9 children)

That interview answer always seemed like a cop-out to me. You could make a comparison to gravity to explain how magnetism "just is".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

https://xkcd.com/1489

Title-Text: "Of these four forces, there's one we don't really understand." "Is it the weak force or the strong--" "It's gravity."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I expect Feynman’s answer, if he had a whiteboard and unlimited time, would’ve been to dive into Maxwell’s equations.

With that in mind, his answer makes complete sense. Good luck explaining coupled PDEs to people who aren’t mathy in a few sentences without visual aid. The analogy to the gravitational force isn’t on point; there’s a lot more to be said about how magnets tie to into E&M more broadly, compared to gravity.

Though you’re absolutely right that once you get deep enough into any topic in physics that the answer to “why?” inevitably becomes “it just be like that”.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

The analogy to the gravitational force isn’t on point; there’s a lot more to be said about how magnets tie to into E&M more broadly, compared to gravity.

Yeah, a proper answer would need to dive into how it relates to electricity for sure

[–] skisnow 3 points 5 days ago

I think OP's meme illustrates Feynman's point very well; there comes a stage where if the number of incorrect statements in your explanation outnumber the the correct ones, it's no longer a meaningful explanation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Here's the video.

It's been a while since I watched it, so judge for yourself.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

Yeah, "spin" was a stupid thing to call it. We have a nice, hard definition of what "spin" is on a macro scale. Why take a complex property of matter that we don't have a name for, and give it the same name as a fairly common, easy-to-understand phenomenon? Extraordinarily smart people being idiots, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago
[–] HugeNerd 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Imagine a woman in hot pants with thighs like a Robert Crumb dream woman.

I don't know if it helps with this problem though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

NoU Imagine a cactus eating a deer.

[–] HugeNerd 2 points 3 days ago

That's a challenging wank.

(RIP Sean Lock)

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like a class with an attribute called spin.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It does however also have repercussions that are inline with it being a sphere that is spinning.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (7 children)

The universe is a digital simulation confirmed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

The memory required to track all these particles was insane, so we just made a wave of where they were most likely to be and picked a random spot when the exact location was needed. 🤷

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

imagines a static cube

Ahhh....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Right-hand rule bitches!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

electrons be vibin

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

A ball, however tiny, has 3 dimensions, it has a surface that moves around a mathematical point at the center of the sphere.
A point of zero dimensions has no diameter nor perimeter, no surface with which to spin. Yet when influenced by a magnetic field, a point-like indivisible particle behaves as if it does spin.

As Chief Brody might say, we're gonna need a bigger math!
How about imaginary numbers and the complex plane?
Now add the Uncertainty Principle, just for shits 'n' giggles!
Probability space! Probability amplitudes and polarizations!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The way I understood it (probably wrong): imagine if a point like thing, but is actually a wave, hits something else. It will leave a trace on the detector curving in a certain direction. This is interpreted as angular momentum aka spin.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Ah yes the spin

load more comments
view more: next ›