this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
182 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24163 readers
3514 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Hey troops. How's it feel being political show cattle?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Same as it ever was

Same as it ever was

Same as it ever was

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago

Can we go back to calling them baby killers? Im tired of jacking off anyone in a uniform post 9-11.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

War, war never changes.

[–] CobraChicken3000 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh wow, so we're just doing away with constitutional rights? Freedom of speech and assembly is being tested. Do not give them an inch, otherwise it will take generations to get it back.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

This is already the "taking a mile" phase.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (4 children)

@tonytins

Seriously?? What the actual fvck. Red governors are going to usher in civil war.

I imagine Trump ate this up.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 days ago (3 children)

These guys have been craving for another civil war since Trump’s first term.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

These guys are the progeny of those who have been itching for a civil war since The New Deal. The Business Plot failed because Smedley Butler refused to play along. Then The John Birch Society failed after gaining some ground. Nixon courted Dixie racists with The Southern Strategy. Then Reagan came along and got Evangelicals and saw the rise of union busting. Prosperity Gospel messaging replaced loving thy neighbor. Then Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh ruled the 90s. Then Obama got elected and people’s brains broke and then shit ratcheted up even more. The right wing realized over the years that the only way they will stay in power is if they appeal to people’s worst impulses. They proliferate hate and fear. They are aesthetic with no substance creating a feedback loop to be exploited.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

you’re not wrong, but aesthetic is a noun, not an adjective.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is the kind of pedantry I post on the internet for. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

i’m here for you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't know if he used it correctly before the edit, but FYI it can be either.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

@tonytins They have just been biding their time.

It’s easy to see why we couldn’t abolish slavery by legislation. The hate runs deep and the greed is plentiful.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

we couldn’t abolish slavery by legislation

Wasn't that what the 13th amendment about?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

@UnderpantsWeevil

I meant that it was ultimately necessary for the country to engage in a civil war to settle it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That goes beyond the legislative outlawing slavery. A big cause belli for the war was insurrectionist abolitionists (John Brown, most notably) threatening the possibility of a national slave revolt. Also, slave trafficking in northern states, as the courts dismantled all the regulation against interstate traffic. New York, for instance, was the largest slave trading city in the US on the eve of the civil war.

The Southern response was to impose material law on the north, through the Fugitive Slave Act and then the armed rebellion.

This was long before any legislation was under consideration. Hell, it was before Lincoln had even taken office.

The question, in 1860, was not whether to outlaw slavery nationally. It was whether anti-slavery laws could be enforced anywhere, even regionally.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

These guys have been craving for another civil war since ~~Trump’s first term.~~ the last one. FTFY. :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Fair enough. xD

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This was in project 2025, none of them are surprised, it's literally the next step in the plan they showed us. It's too bad that document was 900 pages and took too long to make summaries of that people's attention span lapsed by the time they were available. If you want to stop being surprised, summaries have been available since within the week it was originally posted though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

@Tarquinn2049 I reserve the right to be shocked and appalled. 😉

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Hehe fair. I am still shocked every day that they gave away their plan and are still able to pretend they are reacting to what is happening rather than just following the plan they told us they were going to follow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

*fuck. You can swear on the internet. Don't worry, we won't tell your mommy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

@macaw_dean_settle Lol. I usually let the F bombs fall where they may.

A long-legged black and white bird walks across the meme, captioned Living through a cautionary tale fucking sucks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It'll work though too. People will show up. The most active protestors will be targeted and arrested. The rest will eventually go home and in a month we'll be on to the new thing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

@Melvin_Ferd

I must disagree. This travesty will not be easily moved on from. And the world assuredly won’t allow us to forget it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The reason I'm so frustrated with the left is because I wish you were right. But fucking hell I've seen it too many times. I've had this exact discussion every other time. The left are fucking performative and have not conviction. These protests are just to go get their "protest passport" stamped and go home then bitch about things until the next one.

Meanwhile it's an opportunity for the authorities to go fishing. Police training isn't what it is to be. They have protests down to a science. Plus they will be able to fight for bigger budgets.

I'm not saying protests shouldn't happen. I am saying North American protests needs to something more than just showing up to get heads kicked in and make performative acts. Like it honestly seems like they biggest advances in how to protest came from other countries like China or Egypt. I don't know. I'm just fucking done with it all. I'm telling you in a couple weeks none of this will matter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

@Melvin_Ferd

Let’s check back in on July 4. He’s got 28,000+/- more “criminals” to round up and deport.

I don’t think I’d label the Civil Rights movement or BLM protests as performative, though.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago

"Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, ..."

You know what else is part of the fabric of our nation? Violent protests. You know who's usually on the side of starting those? The State.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

What a surprise old "Pull up the ladder" Abbott is bowing before his king even asks. What sad state of affairs America has become, ready and eager to give up freedom to a self titled king for lols at half the country. Pathetic, traitorous buffoonery is just expected at this point. Tots and pears.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

"But muh free speech"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Yank the chair out from under him. Seriously.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Well, if you're gonna "anticipate stuff" you might as well anticipate a prolonged war and just ask for a permanent presence right? While we're being presumption, and anticipating, ask for the soldiers to be quartered in your house...