This will require two separate aspects: a diplomatic aspect and a military aspect.
Spoiler: they’re both military aspects
This will require two separate aspects: a diplomatic aspect and a military aspect.
Spoiler: they’re both military aspects
If you like Tobai No. 1 then give Bushido Blade 1 and 2 a shot. Also published by Square, they’re weapon-based fighting games but with the unique mechanic that weapon damage is relatively realistic: a crucial blow/cut to a limb means the opponent can’t use it anymore, and instakills are possible by direct strikes to the chest or head.
Crushed for cishet reactionaries: people making fun of you on Facebook.
Crushed for LGBT people: a trans and/or homophobe literally crushing their skulls.
So what you’re saying is that Stalin was a member of traingang?
The problem with the edge cases/humans cause errors too argument is that, yes humans make mistakes. However, assuming no impairment issues from drugs/alcohol/sleep deprivation, humans are pretty good at recognizing when they’ve made a mistake: “There’s headlights coming at me, I must’ve drifted into opposite traffic.” Computer programs, however, are not good at adjusting to novel situations; if the code doesn’t have an algorithm to deal with a situation or encounters a type of object it doesn’t have in its database, not only is it going to do a wrong thing, it’s not going to know it’s doing a wrong thing. It’s like the brooms from the Fantasia piece, if they don’t have the programming for reacting to a flooded room they’ll just keep piling water in.
Of course, the real answer here is build more public transit, eliminate stroads, and limit speeds to ~20 mph/30 km/h in places where pedestrians and cars have to interact. Tech bros would rather build ridiculous solutions than have to be around a poor person on the metro.
IDK American leftists squabbling about theory they clearly haven’t actually read sounds pretty on point to me.
Can the loser’s company be seized and turned over to public control and ownership?