PeriodicallyPedantic

joined 2 years ago
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You're being intentionally obstinate. You keep implying that you can't host your own relay, to which many PDSs (that also link to other relays) can't link.

With bluesky, people choose what federations to join by selecting which relays their PDSs will join.

The analogy of geopolitical federation is cute, but that's an analogy, it's not actually what federation is when talking about technology. You seem upset that bluesky achieves federation with a different architecture, and idk why you'd be upset about that, or even care

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not Fediverse™ because it's not activitypub.
But that doesn't make it not federated

Just because it uses a different mechanism to achieve federation you're going to say that it doesn't count as federation? That's wild.

PDSs get federated by relays.
You can have multiple relays which means you have multiple federations. This is similar to how the Fediverse ends up with pockets completely defederated from each other.
Except that a PDS can be in multiple relays (federations) which the Fediverse can't do.

You're right that currently there is no meaningful federation because there is only one relay, and it's a problem that the cost is so prohibitive. But to say that it isn't a Fediverse is kinda disingenuous.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I don't think so?

But a single PDSs can talk to multiple relays.
And I think an app view can talk to multiple relays (or at least switch between them)

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 2 points 3 days ago

I see this as an absolute win

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 7 points 3 days ago

Imagine the 100m dash at the Olympics. But for cars.
Just a short straight line. Head to head race, first one to the end wins.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For a long time we've said it's important to separate semantics and presentation (eg html vs css).

I've always wondered why we never followed our own advice when creating new programming languages. Let the IDE present whatever TF you want, and in the background it's simply building an Abstract Syntax Tree and serializing that to a file in whatever serialization format it prefers.

I've dreamed of making my own data-flow language that follows that principle, but I have neither the knowledge of compilers nor the free time to try.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 1 points 3 days ago (6 children)

That's not quite true afact.

There are 3 types of servers:

  1. Personal data server (actually hosts your post)
  2. Relay (aggregates posts from all PDSs, responsible for federation of PDSs)
  3. App views (generates feeds from the relay)

Bluesky hosts the only relay I'm aware of, because relays are very expensive to host. But afaict anyone can host a relay.

So if we're to describe it:
PDSs are nations states
Relays are the federation of those nation states App views are like the ambassadors of the federation.

Except that PDSs can be part of multiple federations, and app views can be ambassadors for multiple federations. Ok not a great analogy.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 5 points 5 days ago

Oh fuck, for free???
I love Subaru

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 5 points 5 days ago

Unless you're climbing a penis ladder

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What about item damage?
Items have hit points, you can damage them... I'm assuming that counts?

Although idk if I'm ready to switch to the new rules mid-campaign

 

I'm trying to figure out a ruling for something one of my players wants to do. They're invisible, but they took a couple of seemingly non-attack actions that my gut says should break inviz.

Specifically, they dumped out a flask of oil, and then used a tinderbox to light it on fire. Using a tinderbox isn't an attack, nor is emptying a flask, although they are actions , and the result of lighting something on fire both seems like an attack and something that would dispell inviz.

I know that as DM I can rule it however I want, but I'm fairly inexperienced and I don't wanna go nerfing one of my players tools just because it feels yucky to me personally without understanding the implications.

Is this an attack or is there another justification for breaking inviz that is there some RAW clause I didn't see? Or should this be allowed?

 
 
 

I know I have small hands but c'mon. Flagship phones these days are strait up small tablets, not even what we'd have called on phablets 15 years ago.

I know it's what people buy, but I'm still sad that if I want a phone that small then I have to deal with camera and display a couple gens old

116
hmmm (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by PeriodicallyPedantic to c/[email protected]
 

That was quick

 

Ontario must never be forgiven for this

 

And Jamaican patty

113
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by PeriodicallyPedantic to c/[email protected]
 

I can't stop listening to this.
I feel like I need to go play chess now. Idk if it's AI generated or not, but it's so catchy

 

I'm probably going to judge you if you say Holocene, without an interesting non-trivial reason.

 

Using copilot:

generate and image of Shrek opening a can of beans, but unexpectedly Mac & cheese flies out and lands on the donkey

Unholy union of ai memes

view more: next ›