thfi

Yes

Ich erspare euch das Klick-bait:

Laut ZDF-Politbarometer treiben BSW-Anhänger zurzeit dieselben Themen um wie im vergangenen Jahr bei den Landtagswahlen. Sie beschäftigt vor allem die Asylpolitik und die Wirtschaftslage. Darin unterscheiden sie sich kaum von den Wählerinnen und Wählern der anderen Parteien. Was auffällt: Die BSW-Anhänger betonen häufiger als die Anhänger anderer Parteien, dass ihnen das soziale Gefälle in Deutschland Sorgen bereitet.

Ansonsten wird Allgemeinwissen über das BSW wiederholt, wie z.B. Wahlerfolge in ostdeutschen Landtagswahlen oder Umfragewerte.

Archiviert: https://archive.is/l4A0A

Nur knapp daneben in meinem Feed: https://sopuli.xyz/post/22719419 Passt irgendwie …

Things had "2000" in their names to make them sound cool or futuristic, like Video 2000 or Windows 2000.

Geht nicht klar hervor, aber werden weiterhin mit Handys gemachte Bilder akzeptiert? Falls ja, wird es sogar billiger, weil du dir den Umweg über einen 5-Cent-Papierausdruck sparst.

Vor allem, da Spahn wohl schon bereit steht, in einer Merz-Regierung ein Pöstchen zu übernehmen. 😕

Ifall det finns ett RSS-flöde att följa kan du använda RSS Parrot för att tolka flöden till inlägg i Mastodon eller andra tjänster. Dessa inlägg kan man dela, boosta eller kommentarer på. https://rss-parrot.net/

From what I heard from a teacher who was on exchange to China is that traditional Chinese education values the memorization and ability to rephrase or reproduce previous scholars' work, but neglects reflection and own ideas, especially if you are just a student. Western academic traditional to the contrast values the student's ability to evaluate, compare, and reflect on previous work. Hypothetically, a report that would give you a pass with distinction at a Chinese university would make a plagiarism checker cry at a Western university and vice versa.

Many arguments call countries' names, but actually prices are dictated by companies (directly or indirectly by their behavior) that want to make a profit. Sweden's electricity prices, as a rule of thumb, are always lower than prices in Germany, so from an economic p.o.v. it makes sense to buy as much electricity in Sweden as can be transported south. Of course, that drives prices up in Sweden to historic level (but still cheaper than in Germany). Why are prices so high in Germany? Several reasons have been discussed here, but one I would like to highlight is that operators of gas and coal power plants, which are meant as reserves in cases of high demand and low supply, do not produce sufficiently much electricity: they simply earn more by selling little electricity at high prices than by selling more electricity at lower prices. The politicians' fault is that they have created a mostly unregulated market where under the right conditions some actors can make huge profits at the cost of everyone else. This is why more nuclear power plants won't help: even their operators will have to pay back the huge debts left from construction and thus also will try to maximize profits from high prices via low supply.

Naja, da an unbekanntem Ort in der Cloud gehostet nur eingeschänkt nutzbar für personenbezogene oder vertrauliche Inhalte (also fast alles bei firmenbezogene Videogespräche). Aber immerhin, nettes Produkt, würde sowas gerne als Open Source zum selberhosten oder bei vertrauenswürdigem Anbieter sehen.

Germany's government is a three-party coalition where all three parties have lost in recent regional elections, so they try to show their profile ahead of the national election next year. Especially the party which now causes the most trouble (by appeasing an opposition party in a bid for a future coalition) got close to 0% of the vote in those regional elections. The chancellor himself has an unresolved history of being involved in a large tax evasion scheme ("cum-ex") back when he was head of a regional government. Otherwise, he tries to do nothing wrong by not doing anything at all (ok, he does the day-to-day business, but no inspiring long-term goals or other leadership things). In contrast, the vice chancellor (from the Green party) does a noticeable better job at explaining and motivating the government's decisions. Unfortunately, even this party has people in leading positions where they should not be …

Why would you study anything with literature if you had never read a book before? This sound like a colossal waste of time and money. My theory is that if you were good at anything or had an interest in a particular topic, you would study something else like engineering, medicine, or law (I exclude the case that you may be genuinely interested in literature). Thus, many of those who study literature have no idea what they should study else and probably think that they can always get through a course which is about book. Why? Probably rich family pressured them into studying instead of posting stuff on Instagram or TikTok.