this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
165 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19625 readers
4702 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The best option is probably take them up on that offer as soon as possible and start looking for a different job.

If you don't take the offer you will be fired anyway just later when the jobs are already filled outside.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

You’ll never actually get the money. Trump doesn’t have a slush fund he can use for this. Congress would have to allocate funding and they almost certainly won’t. Or he’s basically a dictator and just won’t pay like he doesn’t pay his lawyers and contractors.

They’re probably just trying to identify people who aren’t loyal to Trump so they can sideline or fire them. They don’t give a shit if some liberal gets scammed. I mean, Trump scams his own supporters. You think he gives a shit about scamming a liberal?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile the federal government is running on a skeleton crew and millions of people get screwed over or go hungry or die.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So the suggestion is the people who voted for this government have no idea what they were doing and now the workers need to go against their own government to save America? If that would be so then democracy doesn't work in America.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m not going to entertain Russian trolls. The majority of Americans did not vote for Trump, and the vast majority of those who did likely wouldn’t agree with a wholesale dismantling of their government. The ones that do agree can fuck right off for thinking Trump has any interest in their lives or wellbeing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

I'm not a Russian troll which you clearly can see from my posting history.

The majority of Americans did not vote for Trump

Then how does democracy work normally?

[–] wise_pancake 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just wait 6 months for them to ask you to consult to do your own job for a higher price

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you get hired back or work for the government within 5 years of your voluntary separation payout, you have to pay back the full amount before your first day back.

[–] wise_pancake 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That sucks. I wouldn’t take that deal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

You are a wise pancake, indeed, my friend.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you get hired back or work for the government within 5 years of your voluntary separation payout,

If you work for a contracting company that contracts you to the government, wouldn't that bypass that "gotcha"? As in, you work for the Federal Government, resign and get paid out. Then you get hired by Lockheed Martin as a contractor, and get placed back in the same work you were doing (but are now paid a higher rate because you're a contractor and not a government employee on the GSA schedule". Would that not work?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Possibly, but then you'd trigger the "The Fuck do I Know" clause. That's where I shrug my shoulders and give up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I respect that credential.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

The wording of the agreement was basically "in exchange for agreeing to quit in September, you can keep working from home." You are expected to keep working and if you get another job they'll stop paying you. Not as generous a deal as the headlines make it sound, but still may be the best choice for some people, especially people who expect to get let go anyway.