this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
555 points (95.1% liked)

Greentext

6084 readers
609 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 100 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wish they did this right now. Breaking through bulletproof glass is easy with the right tools. A flying dropkick is not one of them.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The gimmick was you couldn't do it with tools.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago

You can't use anything at all if it's effective actually.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fuck the rules, it's 3 million, I'm going to do whatever is necessary to smash that glass 😎

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The images are made to look like CCTV footage of a bus stop, but there is zero chance they left that much money in there unprotected. You could just ram it with a car and haul it home. Either it's fake money or it was only there for a day with a crew for filming.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

There was a contracted security guard there at all times, a rule that you couldn't use any tools, and they called it off after a day when the bus stop frame started to weaken. Only $500 of real money was placed on top of a bunch of fake money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

There isn't any actual money inside.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

The real gimmick is there isn't really 3 million in there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You couldn't as you weren't allowed to. It was a bad marketing campaign because people think "omg why it's so easy".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, not allowing any tools shows a lack of confidence in their glass.

The CEO that stood behind his company's bullet proof glass while an employee shot it with an AK or something knew how to do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Walk up with steel stilettos and a practiced kick and you might have a shot.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think they limited you to only being able to kick it

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What is the point then. I'd be pissed if someone was able to break a regular window by kicking it. If you have to prove that your bullet proof glass can stand up to kicks I'm not going to be confident in your product. Let people bring their own shit and show what it would take to get through it. You know, unless it sucks, which I assume to be the actual case here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Proving the strenght of the glass is only their secondary goal. Their primary goal is marketing, getting their name out there, and having people talk about their brand.

And hey, they sure succeeded, as I've seen this exact image way too f-ing often.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Go kick a window in your house right now. If you don't live in a highrise, you can almost certainly kick it out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Please don't. Chances are high that the window is not made of security glass and if you kick the glass in, you'll get serious cuts in your leg. That'll range from a flesh wound to life threatening damage in a blood vessel.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

That makes sense. When I read that, my immediate thought was: demo saw.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Are you gonna tell the guy who shows up with a .500 Smith and Wesson revolver he’s not allowed to shoot it?