this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
2597 points (99.7% liked)

Fediverse

30470 readers
886 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's brief, around 25:15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=nf7XHR3EVHo


If you've been sitting on making a post about your favorite instance, this could be a good opportunity to do so.

Going by our registration applications, a lot of people are learning about the fediverse for the first time and they're excited about the idea. I've really enjoyed reading through them :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 282 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I wish he had mentioned Lemmy, but it's understandable that he didn't. Also Bluesky isn't an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn't stealing so much of our publicity lately.

But beggars can't be choosers, and we have seen some nice growth over the past couple months. John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols is only going to harm us in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

That's what I suspect

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols

shrug, I wish they were with us, but they are also a big ole corporate entity, so I'm kind ok with us staying our our side of the fence. As they need to implement payment and corporate protections to their network, we're free to be free over here.

is only going to harm us in the long run.

We don't have to play ball. not with them anyway,

I think, If we have any credible threat, it's going to be from the Governmental gross anti-tampering laws, forced moderation, or backup regulations. They could make it legally difficulty for us to exist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think, If we have any credible threat, it's going to be from the Governmental gross anti-tampering laws, forced moderation, or backup regulations. They could make it legally difficulty for us to exist

This. I have considerable concern that Fascists will straight up ban Fedi if enough people shift to it. They don't like not being able to control everything, Fedi is far too much actual freedom of communication.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (8 children)

The thing about fedi is how do u stop it. Ban every instances ip? make it illegal to use? They can try but they will have very little success.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

They'd shut down large instances, pressure WordPress to remove support, in the US at least, it could be seen as too risky, if they wanted to they would find a way. I don't think this would happen easily in the EU though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Bluesky was always twitters goal, they were losing hella money, so they devloped blue sky.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

Too late - we are already here!:-P

img

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

This was literally the photo that finally got me banned from Reddit years ago.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How can anyone not love the guy?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think he plays the awkward card to actual cringe levels at times but I'll also watch Cody's Showdy so that can't be it entirely.

Can't say I love him, but I do appreciate the work he does.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otter 33 points 3 days ago

Indirectly, looking up "John Oliver Mastodon" brings up this post in the top few. "John Oliver Pixelfed" has this post as the first option

So we're not completely left out :)

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Also Bluesky isn't an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn't stealing so much of our publicity lately.

This; I'm so sick of hearing it pop up when people mention alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure anyone mentions bluesky as an alternative to big tech.

Pretty sure they only mention it as an alternative to musk/X.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This right here, the everyday person doesn't know what federation is let alone believes that it's an alternative to federated platforms. They see it as a better Twitter that's not run by Musk and honestly that's all they need to know.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Holy shit! A sane rational Lemmy user in the /c/Fediverse community! Someone who sees the bigger picture, and isn't just reacting to this small niche area of the internet.

Look, I love Lemmy, but I can't sit by and act like just because something is a better service, and makes logical sense to use, that people will ever have even heard of it. That's not how PEOPLE work. Yes, Lemmy is better than reddit. But no, Lemmy will not overtake reddit in usercount maybe in my lifetime. Unless reddit gets sold, and then plummets into death like myspace did. Then Lemmy wins by default, but it's not the same thing.

And ~~everyone~~ (well, everyone but you I guess) most people on this community seems to miss all that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

They haven't gone through the churn of corporate emshittification enough yet I'd have to guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The thing that it really has going for itself is that it simply isn't twitter. And Muskler made sure that's a huge deal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Using it myself, this is technically true but also it's literally Twitter pre-takeover-- like a fork all the tolerable people started using. You've got your George Takei and your Stephen King, etc, so it's what left of center normies can enjoy without being a little too far (like us, here).

If I'm being honest, I prefer to mix the two communities because a little too much Fediverse can make you go crazy, plus I spread Lemmy ideology there cause someone's gotta bring up class warfare and Linux, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Someone using BlueSky over Twitter is a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

We still shouldn't be doing the dirty work of rich people for them.

We should all be promoting Mastodon over the centralized and corporate-owned bluesky.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Agreed, but at least Bluesky is a public benefit corporation, so it supposed to take in the needs of society as well as profit in its decision-making. That may not be much, but it's a start.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I'm not familiar with the details of that, but it seems like more of a red herring to me. A form of controlled opposition to divert people away from truly revolutionary platforms.

Of course it has to seem like a plausible alternative, but is it actually decentralized or altruistic enough to make a meaningful difference? I think not.

[–] Evkob 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Public benefit corporation" is such an oxymoron, I know it's cliché to say this but it reads like something out of 1984.

If your goal is truly to benefit the public, why wouldn't you start a non-profit? It's because they want profits, which will always be at odds with the interests of the public.

[–] Revan343 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If your goal is truly to benefit the public, why wouldn't you start a non-profit?

Because your non-profit isn't likely to go anywhere; Capitalists don't give significant money to non-profits, but they'll invest in a public benefit corporation because of the potential for profit. The corporation can then take their money and use it for whatever public benefit it intends to work towards. It's a workaround to try and scrape some benefit to society out of capital, that otherwise wouldn't exist.

Whether Bluesky is actually a good example of a public benefit corporation or not, I have no idea, I don't use it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

"Public benefit corporation" is a meaningless designation. All it means is they have the option of putting their mission over their shareholders, not that they are obligated to do so.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

John Oliver being uploaded to YouTube is awesome! I should comment that Lemmy is a great Reddit alternative

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

I agree, but I also think we should remember a loss for musk is a win for society

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Do you really think Lemmy could handle the amount of people that Reddit has?

As far as I know the existing instances are usually running on capacity and always in need of donations, and that’s when the owner isn’t handling the costs themselves. I’m not sure how well most instances have right now.

Maybe Lemmy would benefit of some way to get people to pay, such as purchasing the ability to give people awards etc. like Reddit. Despite being useless stuff, it might provide some fun that would make hardcore users want to pay. But for that to work out, all apps would also need to show the posts awarded in a different way, so I think that’s unlikely.

But the point is that without a business model, the Fediverse will only be able to handle a limited number of enthusiasts before it faces scaling problems.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Do you really think Lemmy could handle the amount of people that Reddit has?

yup. no question. Not one instance mind you, but Reddit is also a giant cluster. (and clusterfuck)

As far as I know the existing instances are usually running on capacity and always in need of donations,

We just need the big bois to stop stuffing themselves. There's 0 reason to have 2/3 of the totally traffic flooding into world because people are scared of Federation that they never even have to deal with.

Maybe Lemmy would benefit of some way to get people to pay, such as purchasing the ability to give people awards etc.

Maybe we make some premium pay servers with baller architecture, killer response time, user capacity limits and high speed storage?

But the point is that without a business model, the Fediverse will only be able to handle a limited number of enthusiasts before it faces scaling problems.

Eventually, it's going to be ads, donations or payments. It's all someone else's computer, someone has to foot the bill. But at great scale, you should be able to have an ad-free experience for something in the range a dollar or two a month.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)