this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
166 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

9868 readers
647 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter
mp3
[email protected]
166
Opinion | Privatizing Canada Post would be a costly mistake (www.thespec.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Sunshine to c/canada
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugarfoot00 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Privatization of liquor in Alberta has worked out amazingly well. Booze is cheaper and there's a liquor store every 100 meters, some open well past midnight. It's an alcoholic's dream.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TIL Alberta had state run liquor stores. I'll have to read about those when I get home.

[–] kent_eh 2 points 1 week ago

TIL Alberta had state run liquor stores.

At one point every province did.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean to an alcoholic in the small scale it sounds like it's working out great.

But Canada's recently done a study that shows the taxation gained from alcohol consumption is far less than the deleterious societal costs.

Effectively the government loses money on every bottle it taxes.

edit: This is known as Canada's alcohol deficit. It was first studied in 2014 which showed a taxation intake of ~11 Billion while the social costs were estimated to be ~15B resulting in a deficit of about ~4B. believe the 2020 study showed the alcohol deficit is up to ~6B a year now. I'm lazy, but here's one link for those who'd like to know more:

https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-40-no-5-6-2020/alcohol-deficit-canadian-government-revenue-societal-costs.html

[–] TheBloodFarts 3 points 1 week ago

Beer in Alberta is far more expensive than in any other province

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same with auto insurance, if you're a responsible driver. I've lived in BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan among other places the last 25 years, and Alberta is consistently far cheaper for auto insurance, if you shop around. A lot of people close to the AB border on the sask side do a little light fraud and pretend to live at their brothers house in alberta

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think Quebec has (or at one time had?) the lowest because you're not required to have collision insurance. You can have just liability, but if your car is a piece of shit you're not required to insure it for repair should an accident occur. I could be wrong, and I'd love to know if I am.

[–] Revan343 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you're not required to have collision insurance. You can have just liability, but if your car is a piece of shit you're not required to insure it for repair should an accident occur

Are there places where this isn't the case?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In my city you are required to have both liability and collision even if the car is worth a dollar. That is true across all of Canada to my knowledge, with the exception of Quebec.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Absolutely false. You're not required to have collision on your own vehicle anywhere as far as I know. Collision on the other vehicle falls under liability, unless of course you haven't paid your vehicle off yet, but even then, that's a requirement of the bank, not the insurer. I don't know every provinces laws perfectly, but I do know cities don't determine insurance law.

[–] Revan343 1 points 1 week ago

In my city you are required to have both liability and collision even if the car is worth a dollar.

I'd be curious what city, but obviously you don't have to answer that.

That is true across all of Canada to my knowledge, with the exception of Quebec.

Then you would be misinformed, because collision coverage is certainly not mandatory in Alberta, and I doubt it's mandatory anywhere