this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
40 points (93.5% liked)

Canada

8156 readers
2129 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The word is "normal":

The agreement with the BC Maritime Employers’ Association, reached with the help of a federal government mediator, included the provision that “normal” maintenance work would continue to be done by union members.

Two sources who saw and reviewed that deal said the caucus believed the word — “normal” — was too vague. They worried employers would use it as a pretext to cut maintenance jobs and outsource work to contractors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The concern is based on industry trends, it would definitely worry me seeing language that vague that can be used to trim the work force.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

I totally agree. The union members should protect their jobs.

[–] mars 9 points 2 years ago

Clarity matters a lot in legal documents. Anyone else remember the case of the comma that cost millions?

[–] Rentlar 4 points 2 years ago

Courts determine what the agreed to contract "means" in the end, so if vague words can end up construed way in the employers' favour, best to avoid that.