I'm not an admin, so I can't stop you from doing that. I'm not sure why you're asking for my permission.
Rentlar
As someone who is good at reading between the lines of Japanese news reporting, here's my translation of a Japanese news source on what is being discussed in tariff negotiations:
アメリカ側は日本車の安全基準を見直すことなど要求を並べてきましたが、日本車にかかる関税25%を引き下げるつもりがあるのかなど、日本との交渉の方針は確認できなかったということです。
(Translation: The American side lined up requests to review Japanese automobile safety standards, but there was no confirmation of whether there was intent to drop the 25% automobile tariffs, and no indication of where the negotiations with Japan would lead.)
また日本への輸出を拡大したい農産物の品目に牛肉やコメ、魚介類、じゃがいもなどを列挙し、関税以外の障壁や制約を取り除くことも求めてきました。
(Additionally, the US negotiators rattled off a list of products they requested to expand their exports to Japan of as well as to remove regulations/non-tariff barriers. This included beef, rice, seafood and potatoes.)
赤沢大臣はこうした指摘に「優先順位をつけて示してほしい」と述べたということです。
(In response to these pointers, Minister Akazawa stated "We would like these requests ranked by priority".)
So all in all, the US side seems to spend their time listing a bunch of grievances, the Japan side lending an ear to their concerns, but not sure where the give-and-take part of the negotiations is here.
Sorry, left my donut at home. Gotta go back and get it.
forgets to return to the office
There exist instances that have more of a free-speech "focus", but despite that most instances cannot tolerate intolerance, harassment, trolling, illegal or borderline illegal stuff. There is generally more tolerance for disagreement on Lemmy than other forums, where unpopular takes are heavily downvoted instead of removed.
A common sequence of events that happens with trolls or flamebaiters:
- Troll says something unpopular, but not rule breaking (comment downvoted but not removed by mods)
- Several other people respond/rebut
- Troll continues a long back-and-forth argument that gets nowhere, or resorts to ad hominems, slurs or personal attacks (rule-breaking)
- comments get reported
- Mods remove the entire thread including the initial comment, and give out a community ban
- Troll decries censorship of the initial not rule-breaking comment, when it was the follow up that was the problem.
So yeah, it's to keep out the jerks. Behave well, think of others as you speak, then you will find yourself able to say more than in places with professed free-speech absolutism. If you don't like that, start your own instance so that no one can moderate you in your own space, and watch the jerks, trolls and spammers roll in after a while.
dysprosium, neodymium, and praseodymium
Are some of the key minerals of interest.
Adding to the challenge, China, which dominates global rare earth material production, has recently imposed export restrictions on several key materials, threatening the supply chain for US technology companies.
This is likely the main driver of focusing on recovering metals from decommissioned parts. America's tariffs are forcing their own tech companies to act like Russian firms under sanction.
Reddit... Let's not go there, 'tis a silly place.
The commenters on average feel more real on Lemmy, so i've been here 2 years plus and hardly needed to look back.
We have great examples from a certain country, to show that "allowing unlimited money in politics = free speech" is bad. There will be disingenuous 'slippery slope' arguments to it but the types of campaigns that this rule is meant to stop is clearly defined and limited.
Flirting with the law here... this photo is legal because it is blank, but just an FYI for anyone here that it is illegal to take or publish photos or videos of a marked ballot under Election Law in Canada.
Yep. Unionization or not we need more working class solidarity.
Nice, subscribed now. Hello from Vancouver!
I love how the "convincing the problem is magically solved" step is not between the reversing the stupid decision and making one, as one might put it logically. Yet, it explains Trump's Republican regime perfectly.