this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2169 readers
510 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey.

My wife needs a surgery that will be on the 10th January next year.

It can't wait longer, it might be cancer but not 100% cancer, could be myom or just cells (skin?) that started growing but they aren't sure.

I will try to make this short: it has to be removed and they aren't sure if they need to remove the uterus and now comes the problem

I don't want kids and if I do, only in 3-5 years ( she as well) but if they have to remove it completly, which they only know on the day the surgery is we can't anymore.

We talked today and said it wouldn't change much if kids now or in 4 years, but tbh I am not even sure and she isn't either if we want kids at all. It's frustrating cause it seems like we might have time if the surgery goes as planned and the uterus doesn't need to be removed at all.

It's not even a guarantee if we would try now anyways, most likely not cause of stress (maybe cancer, maybe not) on her side, my side, and general it's not easy to get pregnant.

I had cancer myself 12 years ago and not even sure if I can have kids myself, if my sperm is "good enough". I have some frozen, but that is it...

Any life suggestions? Trying to make kids on the fly now seems like a dumb idea but will we regret it if she can't have kids again?!

Sorry for bad english. And sorry for writing so "wild" I just can't get my thoughts straight. I am confused.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

You don’t have time to have a kid before this surgery if it’s in January, and I don’t think either of you want this stress.

Best cast scenario, it’s not cancer, move forward however.

Worst case, you have to decide between terminating the pregnancy or removing the cancer.

And the inability to have biological children does not preclude you from becoming parents. Yes, it’s a much more complicated process to adopt/deal with surrogacy/etc. , but you’re not completely cutting off the option to raise a new generation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I worked with a lady who had something similar and had a hysterectomy. While I'm sure there was a lot of disappointment in the beginning, they leaned into their hobbies and currently lead an awesome life filled with travel and video games. Alternatively, there's always adoption or surrogacy. Talk with your wife and see what path sounds best to you two.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd try anyways to avoid the possibility of regret later, even though it's dumb.

You mentioned that you have some sperm frozen, but have you guys considered freezing some eggs too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thats a good idea... but if a uterus is completly removed, how does it work?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A surrogate. That's why I'd try first, since you can never really go back once it's removed

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But if the surgery can't be pushed back from January, that's not enough time for a pregnancy. That's barely enough time to tell whether she is pregnant or not if they tried right now.

So the decision isn't timing or regret, it's whether they value her potential well being over the ability to have natural born children. With surrogacy and adoption as options later, I know what my decision would be in that situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I didn't really think it through. It sounds like a painful decision

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Are they removing her ovaries too?

[–] Mammothmothman 5 points 2 months ago

Kids are life on hardmode. They need so much of everything and take up so much time. Also you could adopt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

You can be completely fulfilled without children. There are so many people in your family, in your community, who need you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pregnancy can accelerate some sorts of cancer too - it's obviously your/her call but I would be very worried about the potential harm to your wife, more than the risk of infertility. ( ETA: I know not one, but two single fathers who lost their wives because of cancer that accelerated during pregnancy and the women would not abort to get treated and died soon after giving birth.)

Sorry you are going through this, and I hope it's resolved easily and your fears are not realized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Having kids sucks, having kids with a medical condition is a nightmare. I'm glad at least my partner is in good health. Sounds like you're after 30 so the child craze should be gone by now.

I also "wanted" offspring in indefinite future. It turned out I didn't really want children.