this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
229 points (100.0% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2608 readers
3 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

[email protected]

[email protected]

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (6 children)

“No, the opposite. In fact, I’m going to be letting two officers from Washington police DC, I believe they’re from DC, but I just approved it,” Trump said. “They were arrested, put in jail for five years, because they went after an illegal, and I guess something happened where something went wrong and they arrested the two officers and put them in jail for going after a criminal. A rough criminal, by the way. And I’m actually releasing… no I’m the friend, I am the friend of police more than any president who’s ever been in this office.”

Everyone is "an illegal" now if it's politically convenient.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess something happened where something went wrong

WTF, he doesn't even know the full details of these people and he just went ahead and pardoned them?

What a clown.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is likely that the vast majority of what he is signing was someone else's idea. Maybe he agrees with it, maybe he is just doing it because he was complimented when it was handed to him, but it is extremely unlikely that he initiated more than a few of the things he has signed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

My money is on Stephen "Nazi Nosferatu" Miller.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

Hylton-Brown is a US citizen, police say, and not in the country illegally as the president claims

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sounds like "illegal" talk to me

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but also despite being born with a penis, and making no attempt to ever change my gender, I’m now legally a female. And so are you if you’re an American.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I thought that quote was you mocking him because if how much it sounds like a toddler...

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He did it to win the police union back after pardoning January 6 criminals who threw bombs at police and hit them with metal bats.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Give the people what they want 🥴

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's time Congress got off their ass and took away the power of presidential pardons. This is clearly not working as intended.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

What are the chances that you could buy a certain crypto coin and then serendipitously get pardoned for some crime or another.

Hipotetically.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

But what will we do with Turkeys???

[–] ininewcrow 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is getting stupid .... why the hell does the US allow pardons in the first place? ... it's now just used as a political tool to hand out pardons for propaganda and promotion.

Justice and Law is slowly evaporating because it is all hinging on what ruler is power and whether or not they will pardon whoever is most convenient to pardon.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

why the hell does the US allow pardons in the first place?

They thought only honorable men would run for president, and the people would only elect honorable men....

🤦‍♂️

(yes, the term "men" is intentional, because back then women were seen as property)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

back then women were seen as property

Yeah I'm kind of thinking that opinion hasn't changed for some based on recent events

Goes to window

Points at American legislation in the last several years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Dammit.....you stole the comment I was going to make, then went back in tkme, and made it an hour before I could....

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of loopholes now used were because they knew it was an imperfect start and assumed that when problems were found or new laws needed the Constitution would be changed. In some cases we've done that, in many we haven't. I think one of the founders wanted to include mandatory revisions over a period, but again the general presumption was that we'd see the need and do it without being forced to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thomas Jefferson, for his many faults, thought each generation should rewrite the constitution to reflect their views and keep it modern.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Many faults? The dude peace'd out to France, partied with the local nightlife, got drunk, got laid, and still found time to be a founding father.

If everybody listened to him, the constitution would be rewritten, and we'd all be drunk and having sex at work.

What's the fault?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It goes back to the royal prerogative of mercy, an English tradition. Because the forefather's mostly made a parliamentary monarchy, but with some democratic ideas mixed in.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Maybe a stupid question, but: How broad are the presidential pardon powers?
Could he pre-emptively pardon anyone who will kill person X?
Could he blanket-pardon all cops convicted of a crime while on duty?
Could he pardon himself for all crimes past, present and future?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Extremely broad, for federal crimes. None of your examples have been tested yet.

Expect them to be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pardons cannot apply to the future*

*Unless you start seeing John Roberts doing a nazi salute, then you should get ready, because you're about to be in a camp

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Quite the optimism on how long it will take when the guy who bought a new department was throwing nazi salutes during the inauguration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

didn't Biden just preemptively pardon his family?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

He did.

But the meaning of "preemptive" is more like a "Just in case", rather than, "immune from future offences".

They were all pardoned from 2014 until now, but trump admin could theoretically invent a new case that allegedly happened on Jan 21 and make an investigstion out of it. (It probably wouldn't go very far tho, I mean considering that even an indictment requires a majority of a grand jury to indict)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

seems like preemptive ones and reflexive ones havent been tested but we are probably about to find out what happens when the prez, congress, and judiciary are all politically aligned and wanna do evil.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They turned off their body cameras and mislead their supervisors about what happened.

Is that the new standard then?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be expected when a criminal is elected.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the people don't get justice from the government, we'll get it ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Hi Luigi. My name is also Luigi. Are there any other Luigis in the room?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Inb4 dylan roof pardon...

😖

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

and I guess something happened where something went wrong

So smart. Knows all the details. A True Leader.