this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
1087 points (97.9% liked)

politics

20117 readers
4078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration's authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let me fix your headline "Sitting incumbents too comfortable to do their jobs annoyed that they are being pushed to do their jobs."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

They are mostly all careerists who focus on who's "turn" it is while they are one foot in the grave. Its a major issue on why we have the current situation.

The fact that hold onto power they are either unwilling or too scared to use is infuriating.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The party leadership needs to step down.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

You forgot quotes surrounding leadership.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they never will, they are fat and happy right where they are. Even a fascist gov't is preferrable to giving up access to wealth and influence they enjoy right now. I'd say much more likely is a workers party gaining popularity but that kind of pro-worker party is gonna have a hard time receiving the financial backing the dems and repubs get.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They think the gravy train lasts forever, seemingly unaware the fascists would be more than happy to see them in the same camps as the rest of us, and would make that happen the moment they get the chance, without a moments hesitation.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey Democrats, why don't you form another couple of committees and release some weak statements condemning the other side while doing fuck-all. Clearly, it's gotten you this far, so why not just keep treading that same old road? It's frustrating to see the Democrats get beaten over the head again and again and learning the wrong lesson. FUCKING DO SOMETHING.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They DO something. Punching down on people that didn't vote for their genocide party. Horrible gloating comments saying it's their fault whenever the israhellis commit more warcrimes and that they deserve it. If that doesn't make clear they are in powerhungry ghouls without compassion IDK what will.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget "Strongly worded letters" and vigorous finger wagging. Which is what passes for fighting from our passel of corrupt do nothing feckless Dem "leaders".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I hear about slamming on the daily, though. And with their frail joints and bones, too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Fucking shit heads. I hope they [redacted].

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups

This tracks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Democrats are tirelessly working behind the scenes! You just don't see what happens behind closed doors!

Behind closed doors:

a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now I'm not saying that the Republican Party is a blatantly fascistic organization designed to re-concentrate all wealth and power into the hands of an aging white billionaire elite afraid of losing their power and want to "scorch the Earth" in revenge for the fact that they and their very specific view of "how things should be" can not last forever

And that the Democrats are not only complacent, but are actively in on the plan and intentionally aiding this grift by pretending to be an alternative choice of leadership that seeks to prevent this from happening, and doing the bare minimum to keep up that illusion to prevent real opposition from showing up.

Part of that plan is to get people to join up with the Democratic Party to resist the Republicans and steer them away from or at least discourage them from doing anything that would actually stop the Great Ominous Plan....

The reason this is so effective is because due to the way America's Electoral System is, anything outside of the R's or D's is entirely unelectable no matter how many people vote.

Though this also means that if the Democrats ever lost control of their party to people who actually want to do something, it would threaten to destroy the Republican Party, and prevent anything like it from rearing its ugly head again. As it would become as demonized as the Nazi Party is in Germany.

But let's just say that that was exactly the case....

What would the D's and R's be doing differently?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is where I sit. Either the Dems are controlled opposition, or they're actually this incompetent. Does it matter? Do you even need to get conspiratorial? No, they're unqualified and should be replaced.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Right? Like, I used to think they were just naive, but they're too damn good at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

It's like the old saying goes, when Democrats make a firing line the first thing they do is form a circle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

Can Chuck Schumer go jump down a well please? Fuck the DNC's "centrist" republicrat agenda. Return to progressivism you archaic troglodytes.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The party is functionally dead. If they don’t come out with absolute opposition we will be stuck with a single party for the rest of our lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The headline almost reads like an Onion article.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

Most of them do nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago

If certain Dems aren't going to do anything constructive, then they need to get out of the damn way and put people like AOC in charge.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Better get fucking used to it bluedogs.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

We need a Democratic Tea Party movement very badly.

Unfortunately, I already know the people who would lead it would also never get past making the rules of who's included, what kind of tea we'll be using, and if it's ethically sourced, and if any members have any problematic tweets in their past, what particular brand of socialism everyone subscribes to, and of course, what we're actually demanding from the government.

Say what you want about the right, but their superficial, Ork-like focus on goals gets them moving. Too bad those goals are usually things like "Vote against our best interests as much as humanly possible."

edit: I love that half the comments below are people disagreeing about how we would organize it and what we would want and who we would include. I both despair and celebrate that I'm not someone who can just hear a single word like "woke" and just laser-focus on uniting with literal crocodiles to take it down. Identify our weaknesses people, stop trying to be smarter than the problem. The problem is stupid simple, we have wealthy elite stealing our lives and futures away and the right is enabling them. Full stop, we should be fucking marching locked-arm with people whom we've been told to abhor to fix this. Imagine if people became scared to associate with billionaires. Imagine if we all did something.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The tea party, however, turned out to be an entirely artificial astroturfed "movement" that got its funding from the Koch brothers. They only came to exist because they were deemed a potentially profitable investment to the one percent. Same goes for Kerry getting "swiftboated". It was always about money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they were class traitors who did it for nothing other than hoping to earn the Koch Brothers favor?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

some were! The rest were useful idiots--just totally unwitting dupes who had no idea who they were REALLY working for. The groups that handled transportation and logistics took "donations" as "non-profit" organizations but the Koch brothers absolutely did appoint individuals to set it up on their behalf AND provided basically all of the funding. The organizers themselves or the people feeding instructions to them were either class traitors if they knew the resources were coming from one source OR they weren't even legitimate members of the working class in the first place but only pretended to be so as to blend in with their marks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

People forget that the "tea" in "tea party" stands for Taxed Enough Already

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›