this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
247 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20117 readers
3968 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So I’m curious: what would happen if she said “no”, and also refused to resign or quit?

Honestly, I’m a bit flummoxed as to why people aren’t forcing the fascists hands here. Don’t make it easy for them. Don’t smooth the process. Make them do absurd things in reaction to our refusal to carry out their absurd directives. Everything should be intentionally messy in this context.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Fully agree, I'm getting really tired of people in positions like this just bowing out and not forcing the other side to follow through on their threats.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As much as we need people to stay and fight, I can't blame them for getting out. This is an administration that has no problem enabling people to send death threats and worse. I can't imagine the kind of stress she's going through.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

We don't know if she has a family being threatened, health issues, etc. either. It's way easier to judge when you have nothing at stake.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get it, this is one major reason why I'm not interested in getting into politics myself, but I think if you're willing to take on this role in government then you should be willing to stand up for it. Pretty easy of me to say sitting behind this screen though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She's not really a politician though. I agree for the politicians, and I agree ideally everyone should, but most people are just trying to get by and only looking out for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm really on the fence with this one, she's not a politician but it is still a pretty public position in the government. I do, however, think that we need to some how figure out how to dissuade people from making death threats, they have become far too normalized at this point, but I suppose with 300 million people in this country you're going to have a large number of the population (even if it's a small percentage) that take things to the extreme and I don't know how you fix that. Like, how do you teach empathy to people who clearly don't have any?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

My employer (a biotech, with some government contracts, and a bunch of research grant money that ultimately finds its way to us) has done the anticipatory compliance thing on DEI - not 100% sure on whether or not they’re just quieting it down, or if they’re really killing the whole program, but they seem to be more concerned about legal/administrative CYA than doing the right thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Quitting is their ideal outcome. If they fire someone then the question becomes "Why?" and in some cases they open themselves up to a lawsuit because the former employee now has standing. They don't want to go on record in court or put themselves in a position to lie under oath. The Law is their biggest enemy and with every single act of malfeasance their quiet assertion is, "nobody is stopping us so it must be okay."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That I understand and is also why I want these people to actually make Trump take an action that is legally challengeable in court. Although Trump is already defying court orders so I don't know how much will come of it, but I figure if we keep seeing the pile of tangible illegal actions that courts are going on record to state they are illegal then maybe we'll get enough sway back away from the far right.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Because many of these people signed on to be civil servants, not political pawns.

And the alt-right has shown that they are willing to kill to get their way. These people didn't sign up for that either.

There are brave souls who are standing up to fascism by digging their heels in. But there are people who never wanted the lime light, who only wanted to do their job. Their bravery is different because they are resigning, forcing the spotlight on them but in a different way.

She probably did the best right thing she could live with.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've seen others try this in other positions. They stop getting paid and are locked out from work, and sue

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Which is more of a protest than just quitting, and more of a drain to the powers that be demanding this stuff go away.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

He told her the prosecutors who had worked on the case against Mr. Adams were being placed on administrative leave because they, too, were unwilling to obey his order.

"He" being Justice Department deputy attorney general Emil Bove III, who wrote an 8-page letter to accept her resignation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the moral courage, too many in power are going along with Trump. It's not easy to quit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

It's definitely one way. I like how she just stalled things for an few days first.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago