this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
254 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21972 readers
4142 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This dude has fucked his political career and I couldn't be happier.

The two party system has clearly failed. It's allowed zero pushback to Trump in the GOP and it's made cowards of the Democrats.

I would hope that the destruction of democracy in of itself would educate these people but I highly doubt they'll ever learn.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago

NOTHING he’s done up to this point will be remembered.

He will be remembered for this. This is it. This is his signature moment. I’m gonna gloat and make fun of him for that when I call and yell at him again tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Are they still rich? Nothing learned, then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

I dont think that this is a refutation of the two party system at all. I think this is a rebalancing of the system in likes to the tea party surge of the kid 2000s.

It isnt a rebuttal. Its a response. as much as the democratic party hates it, it still is well within the status quo and thats why schumer will hang his arms on the cross so to speak. Hes the willing and able party pariah. It is manufactured.

And thats why im worried it isnt enough. Its why im angry still.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

The two party system will always fail. The problem is, Durverger's Law.

As long as the US uses Ordinal voting systems, we will never have a viable third party. Worse, any attempt to create a third party will only siphon votes away from its ideological neighbor, resulting in the ideological opposite gaining an easy win.

There's a reason why Jill Stein had that dinner with Putin.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

So he capitulated to republicans and didn't even do the thing he expidited surrender to have time for?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Not a surprise that this yellow-bellied bitch is too much a coward to face the people he fucked over.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Call your senators (if dems) and demand change in the senate minority leader

Elected dems are showing rising anger, there is real chance to change leadership here

https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A bad political calculus, to say the least. Schumer has alienated himself from the core of his party and constituency, although he may not have expected such a strong response it is hard to see what he hoped to gain by joining Fetterman, Gillibrand, and other politicians that serve as internal stumbling blocks in terms of party solidarity and cohesion in the current environment, where democrats' only positions of power require then to act unanimously.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

he may not have expected such a strong response

I feel that's rapidly become a neoliberal democrat feeling. Not that they'll ever learn from it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Little bitch.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Hey Cuck Schumer, fuck you! you cowardly lickspittle quisling. I can’t wait to donate to your primary challenger.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not liberal criticism. fucking retard ass headline

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Some of it actually might be. They kind of got the liberal base riled up for a potential government shutdown, then decided to back down after doing that. I think even the mainstream libs are upset.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

thats a shame, he had a stop only a few blocks away from me

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

So...

The cowardly coward continues to act the coward.

🤷‍♀️ 🤡 🖕

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Devil's avocado here, but Schumer kind of has a point. They do want a government shutdown Hell, they're trying to dismantle the whole damn thing.

I also wouldn't put it past them to keep dismantling things during the shutdown. Either DOGE cronies are declared necessary and exempt from furlough or they just keep dismantling things anyway. Either way, they would have far less oversight to keep doing what they're doing.

I don't know if there were any poison pills in the spending bill, but assuming the drama is just because he voted to keep things running, then it may be a bit undeserved. I'm under no impression that a government shutdown is going to stop Musk and his ilk from continuing to break things. Plus, I highly doubt they're going to furlough ICE, so it's not like that particular horror is going to stop with a shutdown.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

What more power will a government shutdown give trump, than what he's already taken for himself? Republicans in Congress already will let him do whatever he wants, he is already defying the judicial branch, he has full dictator level power in the government at the moment. And Schumer voted to continue that status quo instead of changing it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Congressional votes are the end of the road and accepting excuses is a vote for fascism at the moment. Schumer has no business being in office and it was clear when he said he votes based on imaginary people from Long Island. I don’t care how much money he can raise if he betrays everything I care about.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

If republicans wanted a shutdown, they wouldn't have voted for cloture.

[–] OutForARip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can’t they shut it down themselves if they really wanted it shut down?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Devil’s avocado here, but Schumer kind of has a point. They do want a government shutdown Hell, they’re trying to dismantle the whole damn thing.

and they're going to do that with or without congressional approval. which, to be clear, Chuckles, here, just voted to give them. Or did you think that amendment he's blathering about is actually going to pass? (spoiler: it's not.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago

They could've negotiated to try to prevent some of the damage for their vote for the bill. Would it have done anything? Doubtful, but it would have at least shown that the Dems are willing to try something before rolling over to take it in the ass.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago