this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
253 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck AI

2351 readers
1289 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was this comic made 2 years ago or something? AI can draw hands now ( it can also catch hands)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

It now does the more obvious hands kind of right, and also does a lot better with I2I models. It's still garbage looking once the hands are not in front of the eye, and GTP4o has some really heavy filtering applied to hide obvious AI artifacts.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Weird phrasing. I've always used (and heard used) "the fuck I can" as a negation. Like "hey, can I get some of those fries?" "The fuck you can."

Or "I'm gonna grab some diamonds from your chest." "The fuck you will."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure the author fucked it off.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

The fuck they did.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

A better one would be "WTF? I can!" or "I fucking can!"

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the best part is that this comic has artistic intent and creativity. looking for the hands isnt always enough anymore with ai slop. sadly

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way I can tell is through nonsensical lighting and/or composition, while it is not foolproof it is still fairly reliable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Often times the background of an image gives it away. Like things that should be rectangular but aren't. On images with plain backgrounds it can be a lot harder to tell sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never seen AI slop that withstands any inspection of detail. Like clothing detail that makes no sense, or things weirdly merging one into another for no observable reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How do you know that you've never seen it?

I am almost certain that I've missed noticing some AI art. Sometimes I've missed noticing it at first only to notice it later. Sometimes I've been presented with images that I know are AI-generated but I would probably never have known that otherwise.

For instance, this one (found on an AI art community on Lemmy about a year ago IIRC):

If I didn't know that was AI generated from the context, I don't think I would have suspected a thing (maybe from the extra "road" on the road, but I think that's the only thing that could give it away for me. And I didn't notice it at first). Other known AI images as well have been very hard to tell, especially when they have no background.

I am opposed to AI for a lot of reasons, but I think it would be naive to think it could never fool me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Why is Saitama giving me the finger?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That's a stupid question anyway.

I can't fly a plane. I can still tell when a plane has crashed. I can't play a sousaphone. I can still tell when someone's played an incorrect note with one. I can't cook Beijing roast duck. I can tell when one has been burned nonetheless, somehow.

It's almost as if the question isn't being asked in good faith.

Almost.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Why is Saitama arguing with his reflection?

[–] SplashJackson 1 points 1 day ago

Looks kinda like Spider Jerusalem