this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
103 points (96.4% liked)

Europe

5865 readers
1337 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, congrats Black Rock...

And of course congratulations, Fotzenfritz...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, it was to be expected. But yes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

But it dies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

So this is how democracy dies? With thunderous applause?

  • Padme
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not really, what would have been the alternative you would have wished for?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The timeline I want to be in.. :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Well of course, me too but that ship has long sailed. I meant what would now be the alternative to Merz winning the chancellor election? No good ones

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, really. My alternative would have been any progressive party and failing that any centralist party, and failing that the CDU with any centralist leader, but all of those failed and now we have Merz. He will damage the working class, exasperate the issues that promote the AFD, and he will normalize them. He is, and the CDU are, Republicans 20 years ago in the US. He will lead to Germany's Trump and the decline of the standard of living for the common man.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well of course, me too but that ship has long sailed. I meant what would now be the alternative to Merz winning the chancellor election? No good ones

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well your original comment translates to defending Merz. To answer your follow up question, I don't know the names of individual politicians in the CDU as I'm still new to German politics and learning as fast as I can. But I have no doubt the CDU has a handful of less ambitious people who could strive to produce some form of centralist policies. Will any of them be good in an absolute sense? No, if Merkel was the best they could do then no. But could someone be relatively better than Merz, who from what I can see would sell his mother down the river for more power and money, yes - most likely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It really doesn't, I think you misinterpreted my answer. But I was actually scared of him failing the chancellor vote because that would have meant even more chaos, the weakening of the Democratic parties and a strengthening of the AfD. There wouldnt have been another CDU politician who would or could have just taken over. What I was saying was: No, not 'Fuck', rather thank god. Even though I hate it, there are no good alternatives right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Again, you're defending him under the notion that the ~3 political parties in this coalition couldn't produce a single other valid candidate from among them. That's unbelievable and if true should be punished by the voters. There's just no way 3 massive political parties contain zero candidates as willing and as qualified as Merz (if not exceedingly more so) and if all of them can't put the country first instead of their ambitions (which is arguably evident already) then we deserve chaos at the government level. And quite frankly I don't know how much better we are with CDU in power vs no one in power. For most policies I'd argue the CDU in power means a decline in quality of life for Germans not an improvement.

The AFD grows not because of chaos at the federal level but because of the decline in quality of life for Germans. CDU is not fixing that they're worsening it. I think there's a solid basis to challenge the notion that a CDU government ran by Merz is better than any other candidate within those three parties and even a basis for argument on the notion that Merz over no one is better. I think the CDU actively harm this country based on their actions.

So no, I don't think I'm misinterpreting what you're saying - that only Merz exists as a viable option. And yes I do believe you're defending him on the basis that it's him or the AfD growing and I think that's incorrect. The AfD will grow regardless because he won't improve things and arguably faster because as corporate taxes go down and public services lose funding, quality of living goes down and more people become amendable to radical change which by their nature centralist parties don't propose. I'm not seeing a left party capitalize on this in the same way the right is, probably because the funding for facism/racism is larger than for wealth equality but that's off topic.

[–] avidamoeba 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why did he loose the first vote? I don't know enough German politics to answer it myself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

It's a shot before the bow. His behaviour in the past had been quite autocratic, trying to pressure parliament etc so this is people telling him that he may be in charge, but he's not in charge.

And he seems to have understood, judging by his face when he was told so in no uncertain terms by one of the speakers. That shot stung.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Slim majority of 18 votes, and a lot of people don't like him.
Merkel actively kept him from power until she was done with politics, privately saying he's dangerous.
He's a ruthless, but not very good, power player with little empathy or ability to reach across the aisle.
The Social Democrats were basically forced into the coalition as the only option to get a majority without the Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Cause nobody likes him

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

As others have already answered he lost because he didn't get the required votes, despite his coalition having a majority. Which is why this was expected to be a formailty and no one in a similar situation had ever lost this vote.

However i would add that unlike some other votes of parliament this one was a secret one, so we will never know who voted which way. Since everyone was present we can deduce that people of his coalition broke rank in the first round and voted against him. But we likely will never know who and why, since i doubt anyone would reveal it (which would be political suicide).

Since they changed their votes for the second round that immediately followed, i assume they wanted to voice their disapproval of Merz, which they succeded in. But (again as already mentioned) Merz is not really well liked.

He left politics for a while during most of Merkels reign and only crawled back out of his hole after she left. And even then he wasn't the first choice (he failed to become the CDU candidate in 2021). So there might be quite a few people that just dislike him enough in general to do this.

Other more recent reasons might be his 180Β° turn on the debt brake (ran his campaign on not changing it, just to immediately do so after the election) or his attempt for harsher migration rules just before the recent election, where he won a vote in pariament with the help of the far right AfD (ofc he distanced himself from them, but you only bring stuff to a vote if you plan to win, and the only way to win that one was with the far right).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Technically because of not having enought votes, but it came as a surprise because the two coalition parties have a big enough majrority - the vote was secret and nobody knows who voted against party lines. So nobody knows why, bubasically comes down to that there are people in the coalition parties that don't like him and just voted against him.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

big enough majority

The smallest majority a government of the federal republic ever had though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Lol, gottya