this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
805 points (99.3% liked)

News

30418 readers
3165 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following Trump’s attacks on Iran, an admin official tells Rolling Stone, “The intelligence assessments have not really changed”

After Donald Trump’s decision to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, administration officials are barely bothering to pretend the unprecedented — and potentially calamitous — attacks were motivated by new intelligence suggesting Iran was on the brink of having nuclear weapons.

Just months ago, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress, in her opening statement, that the U.S. intel community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and had not reauthorized its nuclear weapons program.

While Trump recently publicly disputed Gabbard’s testimony, according to two administration officials with knowledge of internal deliberations in recent weeks, the president’s decision to strike was not driven by any new U.S. intelligence on Iran.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Source: literally my ass”

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the CIA can initiate another coup…ffs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

He gutted the CIA, at the behest of putin

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ship Trump to Iran and let them do what they will

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

How about making that "Deport Trump to Iran and tell their president this is the asshole who gave the order to attack the nuclear facilities in your country, and then leave them and get the hell out of there while leaving them to do whatever the hell they want with him"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

I mean I think they know….

[–] Archangel1313 9 points 1 day ago

the president’s decision to strike was not driven by ~~any new U.S.~~ intelligence ~~on Iran~~.

FTFY.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Wasn't the picture of 1970s Iranian women (dressed like US 1970s women) just floating around a couple months along with the attached comment stating "pictures of places before Muslim rule floating around means the US is about to bomb them" or does that just happen every year

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those pics are always floating around. Means nothing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 hours ago

Yeah I swear it gets post every 4 days.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I’ll bet the decision had something to do with trump’s massive ego.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

o ok that makes it ok then nvm my furious outrage. gj buddy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›