this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

7663 readers
817 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The end of June wave of legislative changes rolls on.

Today, an amendment to the Competition Act comes into force that may have significant implications for employers and employees.

Basically, wage-fixing and ‘no compete’ deals between employers will now be on the same criminal level as price-fixing rather than only being under the civil law provisions of the act.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but it does send a strong signal.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grte 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The penalty for violating the wage-fixing and no-poaching provisions includes imprisonment for up to 14 years, and/or a fine to be set at the discretion of the court.

That's a hefty sentence. You love to see it.

[–] Bo7a 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I will buy a bottle of champagne for the first time this gets enforced. Hopefully it isn't vinegar by the time I crack it :p

[–] Mehillus 6 points 2 years ago

The pessimist in me says to plant some grapes, but here is hoping!

[–] bionicjoey 3 points 2 years ago

I don't see prison time actually being handed out much for this. Any big corporation that does this will also have insulated themselves from liability. Best case scenario, they nominate some fall guy and the execs get off scot-free.

[–] bobby_bittman 6 points 2 years ago

This is amazing news!

[–] MacroCyclo 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When I joined my current company I signed a non-compete which doesn't allow me to work for a direct competitor for five years. Are these straight up non-enforcible? Or is the definition of "competitor" very narrow?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The article explains that this only applies to reciprocal agreements between two or more employers.

This means if it’s just your employer asking it if you, the provision wouldn’t apply. However, if the employers in your industry collude to all require similar non-competes, it sounds like that would come under the provision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Most non-competes are unenforceable for ordinary employees. Essentially if it would deprive you of your livelihood, it’s a no-go. But please check with an employment lawyer.

[–] Yazer 6 points 2 years ago

Great article. Thanks for posting