this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
732 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

12479 readers
2926 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Us developing an actual black hole would be one of the best things humanity has ever done. It would kinda be like inventing techniques to make fire.

We could throw shit around the orbit of the black hole and get fusion. Not just deuterium fusion! Even proton proton fusion. Our energy needs would be solved practically forever.

We could conduct a crazy amount of experiments on the black hole, see quantum effects of gravity and whatnot.

Maybe we could build one of em Alcubierre drives that don't need exotic matter?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can you imagine what a "black hole fusion accident" could look like?

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, of course not. The accident eats all the light I'd need for that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, you could imagine it for a moment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

To us it might even seem like a rather long moment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Or would that mean that you can only imagine, because you could never truly observe it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be almost impossible to do something like that without enough fuel though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In theory you could collapse almost anything into a black hole, every piece of matter and energy has a roche limit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What is that limit for iron and is it referred to as Ferro-Roche?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

There's definitely a paper in this idea

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the first things we will use it for is to make a new weapon of mass destruction. Mark my words.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It would make whoever controls it effectively God, so yeah - probably.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure any black hole we create would evaporate from hawking radiation before it could be used for anything outside of research.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If we could make Jupiter a black hole, would that be stable enough to not radiate away? Other big body we have access to is the sun and I feel we would suffer more side effects of turning that into a hole compared to Jupiter

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Should we be making any of these things a black hole?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Replacing Jupiter with an equally massive black hole shouldn’t make a difference. We’d only have one bright dot less in the night sky.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Except squid aliens will develop a way to move it and annihilate several planets on its way to Super Earth. RIP Angel's Venture.

(This is currently happening in helldivers 2, we turned a super bug infested planet into a black hole and now the illuminate are steering it towards earth)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The sun is debatable, since I think we already use it's photons both for photosynthesis in plants, heat (although we could get infrared warmth from the hole) as well as other benefits

Why shouldn't we holify Jupiter? It would be a testament to our technological progress as well as helping us study black holes "close"ish by rather than in labs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Sometimes our technological progress makes us do things we think are a good idea at the time. Then like years, decades, centuries, millennia later we realize it was not such a good idea after all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Scientists care too much about if we could, they forget to ask if we should.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tiny black holes are the kind of thing that physically cant exist for more than a few like picosecods or something ridiculous like that before evaporating into radio waves.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We kinda don't know for sure though. The tinier the black hole gets, the more it enters into the realm of quantum mechanics. We have no clue how quantum gravity works, so ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Pretty sure the whole point of this article is we have confirmed tiny black holes do rapidly evaporate. We've theoretically known that any black hole just about our sun's mass or smaller will spew more Hawking Radiation than it can consume mass and will shrink. And this process should accelerate as the mass shrinks. This seems to be the first expiremental evidence to support the well established theory.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah.

Then somebody drops it and it just falls down to the planet's core and eats our fucking world.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way we are going, its for the best

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying we shouldn't do it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not really how black holes work. They evaporate really quickly when they're small enough. And if they're small, they don't have much gravity either.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

But it will still be pulled down by earth's gravity. And depending on the size, it's not going to just evaporate if it has a planet's gravity pushing rock and metal into it.

A high speed black hole would just punch through the earth, but if it just falls down, it would destroy the planet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, so even if it "falls down", it will probably evaporate way before it even reaches the center. Even if it doesn't, it will be take A VERY LONG TIME for it to get big enough to eat the planet out or whatever.

It is very VERY difficult to make something fall inside a black hole. Mostly, stuff just zooms right past it at incredible speeds.

The earth would be consumed by the sun way before it gets consumed by a black hole.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

You're talking at scales where the incoming mass has a lot of velocity already. In a stationary frame of reference, the matter would more than likely fall directly in since there isn't an appreciable amount of rotational momentum involved like there is at stellar sizes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not how that works. It's not a DnD sphere of annihilation, it's an infinitely dense point of matter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That shrinks in a vacuum but grows as other matter gets too close. Matter such as "the earth". Explain how we're not fucked if it escapes from its magnetic vacuum suspension because Kevin accidently drops it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

There is a surprising amount of empty space between atoms, and even inside atoms between the electron orbitals and the nucleus. Small black holes are so dense they mostly fall through this empty between-atom space and don't actually hit anything. Even in a matter-rich environment like inside the Earth, you'd need a black hole with more than half the mass of the moon to be large enough to eat matter faster than it loses matter to Hawking radiation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unfortunately an Alcubierre drive dumps a shitload of high energy radiation in the direction of travel when it stops. We would sterilize every world we get to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

What about traveling slightly off axis? Could even tack back and forth.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So why not just stop beside the planet you are aiming for?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me travelling calmly through space when a rogue wave of high energy radiation blasts me from some rando warping 2974738 years ago

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be a non-issue? The radiation is going to be spreading out in a cone, not a focused laser beam. It should dissipate down to a level that a spaceships normal radiation shielding would already need to be able to handle pretty quickly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Hmm, I think you're right

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Isn't that a solvable problem though? Overshoot the target planet by just enough, that it isn't in the hemisphere of the warp bubble pointed towards the direction of motion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think there was a Simpson’s episode about this.