this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
334 points (96.9% liked)

Games

37085 readers
1380 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I genuinely can't believe Half Life Alyx is five years old.

No other video game has felt the way Alyx felt. No one else has taken such a bold swing in what a video game can be. It's burned into my mind as my Half Life game, the one that came out at just the right time for me.

It was also my "pandemic" game. While everyone else was playing Animal Crossing or Doom Eternal, I was playing and replaying Half Life Alyx.

It definitely feels like it's somewhat doomed to be less remembered in the popular consciousness than most big games that come out, and indeed the rest of the games in the Half Life lineage. Cries of "Half Life 3 when?" still abound in spite of the very clear effort Alyx made to move the story forward. But to me it feels like a game that still hasn't been topped in the five years since it came out, not by a long shot.

Half Life Alyx received a Game of the Year win from GameSpot, and nominations from a few other publications. When it came to events like The Game Awards with a dedicated "Best VR Game" category, it won handily.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggins 94 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The reason it's forgotten because most people aren't able to play it. If valve really did put important story in a game that they knew most gamers would never be able to play that's kind of shitty

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 37 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The idea was people would buy the game and play it.

[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 37 points 6 days ago (7 children)

The idea of sinking $500 into a headset and then another $80 for one game is pretty crazy. Not like Valve doesn't have the ownership numbers from the hardware survey. It was never going to sell like HL2.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 19 points 6 days ago (12 children)

Do you know about gaming consoles? 3D accelerator cards? Graphics cards? Or... CD ROM drives?

People have been buying hardware to play a certain game for literal decades. The games are called "system sellers". Games so good they sell hardware. It's usually even the opposite: if your hardware doesn't have such a game, it doesn't sell (atari Jaguar anyone?).

[–] pory@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

$1000 and your gaming PC for Alyx is way beyond buying a PS4 for Bloodborne, and even doing that is a bridge too far for me.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

VR has the extra element of needing a suitable living space to play in, though. Other games I can do at my desk or in my tiny, cramped living room, but I have nowhere I can easily set up for VR that would allow for significant range of motion.

I own a VR headset, but I only really use it for games that allow you to be stationary and just use the headset as an immersive monitor with a standard controller. As one would expect, it doesn't get much use, because not many VR games are made to play that way!

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I thought you still needed to plug the VR headset into a computer ? is the computer built into the headset ?

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Yes for the standalone devices, but you can connect them via cable or wirelessly to a pc too

[–] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most of the common ones now do wireless streaming from the PC for PCVR. But yes, for PCVR games you will still need a PC to run it. There are some VR headsets that are capable of running some games on it without a connected PC, like my Quest 2 can run Superhot or BeatSaber etc.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Pretty cool I didn't know that at all

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean it‘s 5 years old now and what has Valve released for VR since? A single game isn‘t gonna make a hardware and they know that. It was a failure in the end of the day.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

5 years old now and what has Valve released for VR since?

You know Valve has released a whopping 3 things total in that timespan (didn't include deadlock cuz I'm not sure that's officially released yet), right? A free steam deck teaser, the card game they've been working on for a while, and the CSGO 2 update

Valve works slow, my guy

A single game isn‘t gonna make a hardware

Good thing there are a shit ton of other games, then

It was a failure in the end of the day

No it wasn't, you high? They sold out of Indexes around the games launch. Would have sold more if not for COVID, too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PhAzE 2 points 5 days ago

You could buy a quest 2, connect it to your 5 year old PC and play it just fine. I ran it off a gtx 1070ti with that headset just fine.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The game starts at 60 USD and goes down to 30 pretty often. If you have VR already, it's not very expensive.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'm showing it as $18 right now.

[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Plenty of people do that to play a single game.

Given how different it is to other, normal 3d games, I don't think the comparison is fair. Additionally there are a lot of other, really great games in VR too.

Regardless, I don't think the problem is financial anymore. Rather that VR requires a sort of "commitment to inconvenience" where you feel cut off from the outside world (among other things) that I don't think a lot of people are comfortable with.

[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are "plenty of people" enough to make a game commercially viable? And not in an indie way.

I zone out, completely cut off from others, while playing games all the time. What I don't want to do is fork over more cash for things that will collect dust (like a headset for a single game).

Given how different it is to other, normal 3D games, I think it's a bit much to stake your franchise on something most people will never have. It's obvious Valve knew that, they're not idiots and have put out good hardware that didn't see mass adoption in the past (Steam Controller, Steam Link, etc.); it's clear they wanted to try out something new even if it wasn't a huge blockbuster. They have lots of revenue from other sources to fall back on.

They probably hoped that some people would take a chance and get the hardware to play the game, and some people did. But to expect that most would do that? Lol. They're not that dumb.

"The idea" was to do something no one had done before with a beloved franchise. Not to sell headsets.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I don't think they particularly cared if you bought their headset, but they had the premium offering if you were interested. I think they wanted Alyx to be the Mario 64 of VR.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's both financial (huge investment for a single game) and not. Playing with a thing strapped to your face does not sound fun. Especially with glasses. Or in the summertime. Plus I'm a Linux gamer, so I'd probably run into a lot of issues before I could run it.

[–] antithetical@lemmy.deedium.nl 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I also run on Linux exclusively and I could play Half-Life Alex almost flawlessy on the Steam Index. And other VR games as well, including Beatsaber, Gorn, Walkabout Golf and many others. I'm really grateful to Valve and their Proton.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Thanks, that's nice to know in case I decide to get a VR headset in the future.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its $500 today but at the time it was $1500 and required cable and beacons.

[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

True in regards to the index kit but WMR has been around for a long time as well and that was a fraction of the price without base stations.

Also nobody has missed out on playing it yet! There's still time before half life 3! 😅

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

True

it's doomed now, but I love my Reverb G2, I got it for the same price as a Quest 2 (before the q3 released) and, having used both, its a lot better.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

It's also way different from the goal of HL2. Downloading a launcher called Steam for free is not the same thing as buying specific hardware to play one game.

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It's free if you buy an Index

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] baggins 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Valve's 'official' VR hardware costs ~$1500. Ain't no way 😆

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Huh? It's $1K, not $1.5K. still expensive though for outdated as shit hardware.

[–] baggins 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

With the little box doohickeys it's currently $1300 CAD. Add on tax and shipping. I believe it used to be more.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What boxes? The 1k pack comes with two base stations. You mean if you want to add 2 more? Then yea, fair.

[–] baggins 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the valve index is very expensive

The whole kit is $1300 before tax

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Your looking at it in Canadian. I'm looking at usd. So we're saying the same thing, just different currencies lol. Woops.

[–] tauren@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But it's not required, there are much cheaper options, especially today with used quest 2 devices.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The "other reasons" people aren't buying affordable VR setups is because they don't trust Meta or their privacy policies. If the new Valve headset was $300-500 it would go a long way. But $1200 isn't it.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

That is why those other VR sets are so cheap.

With valve, you're paying for the hardware. With Meta, you're the product

[–] BroiledShit@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Psvr2, plus the pc adapter, i got both for a total of like $400 a few months ago, and got hl alyx on sale.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Have you used any other VR headset? I ask just cuz I wanna know how the PSVR2 compares to other headsets.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I've used pretty much all of the headsets on the market. I still haven't tried a Big screen VR headset though :(

For popular headsets I'd rank them kinda like this

  1. Valve Index - it's just really old and really expensive now, don't buy one unless you get a hell of a deal on it used
  2. Quest 2 - Still very very good, screens are getting a little dated now
  3. PSVR2 - its a little janky on PC but it works fine and the OLEDs are sublime
  4. Pixmax Crystal - Money not a problem this is the best headset I've tried. The FOV is crazy, displays are beautiful, and tracking is damn near perfect. Its just like $2300 for the whole lot
  5. Quest 3 - Overall the best headset on the market. Its $570 (just get the pro strap, trust me) and gets you so close to the big boys in screen quality, plus it's wireless, plus it has crazy good passthrough (I use it a lot, most people don't), and streams PC games perfectly.

PSVR2 has really really really good looking displays, but it has some other downsides which really bring it down in the rankings. I'd stay away from it unless you get a deal on a used one, then it would absolutely be worth it.

[–] BroiledShit@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

The only other one ove used is psvr1, and one of those smart phone ones, psvr2 is obvioisly miles ahead of bith, though i cant say how it compares to Index, or quest. Id imagine its probably near quest quality.

[–] False@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of people aren't interested in vr for different reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It's the only good way to do VR. Otherwise it's just a gimmick.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheLoneMinon@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Kingdom Hearts would like a word.