this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
52 points (85.1% liked)

Canada

9527 readers
1282 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

First it was an entire paycheck away, and now $200... next level is pretty much only able to survive because their credit card still has room on it.

Pretty grim.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Just wait until all the people who got their mortgages at 1-2% start coming up for renewal at 6-7% next year.

[–] apprehensively_human 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I signed on a 6.1% variable rate and I'm dreaming of the days when 2.5% was the norm

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Having signed up for 6.1%, you've presumably budgeted so that you can actually pay it going forward at that rate. The problem for people who signed up at around 2% is that they budgeted to pay at that rate. And since a lot of people have no savings, they can't afford a large rate increase now. So, when mortgage renewals start coming up, a lot of people are gonna end up being insolvent.

[–] Showroom7561 6 points 2 years ago

That might be me. I just hope to all the gods that rates come down before renewal.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Why on earth would anyone sign an ARM when rates were lower than at any previous point in history?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

even people who signed for a fixed rate are screwed when they have to renew though

[–] FunderPants 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You are screwed for sure if you shopped at the top of your approval range in one of the hotter high value markets or immediately ate up the rest of your GDS/TDS with truck/SUV loans, renovations or other expenses. However, There will be Canadians who are in a position to handle a rate increase from 2.3% to 6% or so, when their renewals come up.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The context here is that over half the population is 200 bucks away from not being able to make ends meet. So, clearly lots of people will not be able to handle large increases in mortgage payments. Meanwhile, those who do will be pushed further to the margins.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We don't have to renew in the USA. Someone else explained the way they work in Canada and yeesh! That's hella lame.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was talking with a friend in US about this and he was absolutely shocked that you have to renew the mortgage every 3 years of so in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't imagine having to completely re-adjust your budget every 3 years, despite making a 30 year commitment and shelling out most or all of your life savings.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago

it's a completely nonsensical system

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wanna hear grim, I'm youngish and I came out of highschool using my credit card to get by.

Thank god my parents are able to sorta support me, cause financial independence is a dream at this point.

I can only imagine the effect this has on my generation expecting this to be the norm

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was that way in the 90's too. It's not a new problem. I didn't have parental support and ended up couch surfing for a few years while putting myself through college, despite working the entire time. It's hard to establish your place in life when you don't have odds stacked in your favor. I couldn't even get a credit card because I was injured without health insurance at 18, which led to medical collections, which meant bad credit and no credit card.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Oh god yeah I can only imagine what my personal medical bills would add up to, luckily I'm in Canada.

[–] Rodeo 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reflecting on their current debt situation, more households rate their current situation as much worse than it was one (20%, +2 pts) and five years ago (25%, +3 pts) compared to the previous quarter (20%). Looking into the future, more believe their debt situation will worsen over the next year (18%, +3 pts) and five years from now (16%, +2 pts). Fewer also see any potential for improvement over the next five years (35%, -2 pts).

Emphasis mine.

This is just another self-reporting survey. I want to see actual data. When you cross average household debt with average household income, what does that look like?

We don't need anymore self-reporting studies.

[–] Showroom7561 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, self-reporting sucks in most cases. It could be valuable in this case, for example, if the people self-reporting are actually money-smart and not just guessing.

[–] Ilikeprivacy 1 points 2 years ago

That's how things are for me right now. If i didn't have a mortgage and access to loan money I'd be living on the street.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

As far as most neoliberals are concerned, people getting wrung for every dollar of their pay check is a good thing.

Every dollar of wealth they have is immediately extracted from them, starting its inevitable march upwards and into the pocket of a billionaire.