this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
31 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

7726 readers
1431 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] grte 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Most of Canadaโ€™s larger carriers had argued for reforms, saying the traditional wholesale rate-setting method has resulted in competitors paying them less than the break-even cost.

They instead wanted to bring in commercial negotiations as the method for setting the majority of wholesale service rates, saying that model would provide greater opportunity to meet competitor-specific needs while minimizing unnecessary regulation.

To the extent that the CRTC needs reform, it needs change in who is running it. Letting the oligopoly leverage their power advantage over wholesale buyers like TekSavvy (rip) is most definitely not the answer. And who are they to define what 'unnecessary' regulation is, anyways?

[โ€“] SirFancypants 15 points 2 years ago

Whelp, get ready for more price gouging from the telcos. The CRTC has given them a clear and resounding carte blanche to do whatever they want

[โ€“] shamrt 2 points 2 years ago

Given what Distributel and VMedia are quoted as saying, this decision appears positive on the face of it