342
125 House Republicans back 'life at conception' bill, no IVF exception
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
342 points (98.3% liked)
politics
23300 readers
3497 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Under his eye"
Blessed be the fruit.
If frozen embryos are children, I can claim them as dependents on my taxes, right?
I'm assuming that housing and utility expenses are being paid on their behalf, so yes. That should count.
You assume republicans have an ounce of consistency in their policy positions
They’re pretty consistent about doing whatever benefits them most. Otherwise, nah.
Fun fact, the only way you can claim dependents on your taxes is with a social security number. Some people in the US are exempt from the Social Security system and don’t have a number.
So good luck getting a social security number for a frozen embryo.
New goal unlocked!
Is masturbation going to considered mass murder? Or premeditated mass murder?
If life begins at conception, can we get some tax laws changed to reflect that?
🎶🎵 Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great 🎵🎶
If it is then about 90% of us are gonna be serial killers 😂
Women are the target. Men will not be prosecuted unless they help women.
It was a masterbation joke. I was trying to make light of the situation based on OP's initial comment.
Oh I know. Mine should be a joke, but it's not.
You could have 100 ivf embryos setup and claim them as dependants and they're super cheap to provide for. Just a freeze tank.
But then risk of a single power outage and you'll be on death row for the murder of 100 kids.
I'm going to keep fapping every time I get horny and if the feds want me to give up my porn, they'll have to cum and take it.
Masturbation? No. Menstruation? Yes.
If we're going to keep going this route, I have daughters, and I am tired of calling my senators and representatives every week.
Slightly misleading. The bill was introduced about a month ago, before the Alabama SC ruling. There is no mention of IVF in the bill. That doesn’t mean it would be banned per se, but up to federal courts to interpret.
With the logic and reasoning capabilities of the current batch of assholes, if it doesn't say it's exempt, it's not exempt.
The courts are going to ban it, just as they sanctioned hair-based racial discrimination in TX despite a law protecting against that specific discrimination.
It'll be just like abortion being denied the people. Bans for thee and rights for me
Someone please reassure me that there’s no way this gets any votes in the senate.
There’s probably a couple of nuts in the senate that would go for this, but no way in hell that a majority of republicans want anything to do with this, not to mention the democrat majority and POTUS veto power.
The US Federal government STILL has no budget since October 1.
The neckties these guys wear make it really easy to choke them…just throwing that little fact out there in case you happen to come across one trying to rob you of your civil or human rights.
"can't prevent conception" bill incoming soon...
Oh look Steve scalise. Every time I see scalise I realize why that guy tried to shoot him...scalise is a horrible person who hurts other people.
Wonder if they also want to adopt the Korean "babies are a year old at birth" thing too. Or maybe this whole thing is trash and they don't care about internal consistency
They don't give a fuck about consistency outside of cruelty.
Never forget that the cruelty is the point. All the backwards, hypocritical, batshit insane laws that the right pushes suddenly makes sense when you acknowledge that their only goal is to harm people.
All the "protect the children!", "...babies!", "...egg cells" "...heritage!", "...bathrooms!" etc bullshit only ever serves a single goal, which is to commit evil against groups of people they've chosen to hate.
I don't believe that's entirely accurate. Like for enough people for it to be a problem yeah they're just cruel. I think it is more accurate though to say that power and control are the point. Some people are willing to do that by creating fear and offering 'solutions'. Imo he cruelty is a side effect of having to continually up the stakes