this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
392 points (95.4% liked)

People Twitter

5780 readers
3049 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile my lonely ass been sitting over here absolutely loathing Fallout: New Vegas since its release. I did not like that game. I probably would today if I got over myself and tried playing it again.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I read that tweet as something that wasn't really about Fallout: New Vegas, and more as something using it as a vehicle for a joke (about adult women being nostalgic for the games they played as teenage boys).

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

i had a hearty queer chuckle

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah somehow almost everyone is missing the joke? 😭

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The joke is partly that lots of trans women in particular enjoyed this game in particular, so plenty of people who noticed the switcheroo in the tweet will still see it as an opportunity to talk about the game rather than seeing the game as something irrelevant that could be swapped out for another.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure you could swap it out for other things and it would still work, like OOT or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

From what I've heard New Vegas is also one of the games with special meaning in the trans community. Celeste is another (slightly more obvious) one.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

For anyone considering playing or replaying New Vegas, I cannot reccomend the Viva New Vegas modlist enough.

It's unfortunately not just some "one click setup". There is a Wabbajack installer, but there are some small steps you still need to do manually too.

That said, it is by far the best and most comprehensive "vanilla plus" modpack I have ever used. I'm a modding addict; I don't say that lightly. It doesn't change core game mechanics, story, or anything the makes New Vegas what it is.

It polishes what's there, upgrading visuals in a consistent manner that blends perfectly with the original content. It fixes countless longstanding bugs, performance issues, and crashes (only two crashes in ~40 hours on a setup that was modded even further past what the pack includes).

It polishes New Vegas to what it should have been on release (if Bethesda didn't force Obsidian to rush it out the door early), then brings it as close to the quality of a modern release as possible through modding.


If you want to replay Fallout 3, a lot of people prefer playing it in the New Vegas engine using the Tale of Two Wastelands mod. The version of Viva New Vegas that covers that and includes mods for the Fallout 3 content is "The Best of Times".

It appears to be up to the same quality as VNV standalone, but I haven't used it myself yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm probably going to get hate for this, but do you know if any mods that allow the game to work in Windows 11? None of the fan patches I could find in the Nexus actually work, even if they claim they are for Win11 users. The game still crashes constantly. I'm seriously considering digging my old gaming PC out of storage just so I can play NV one last time.

How's the game in Linux? Haven't tried it there yet cause it barely runs in Win7, an OS it was designed for (but at least it runs), so I didn't even try it in Linux cause I'm doubtful it'll work any better than it does in 11.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In my experience, the crashing is usually from some directX rendering compatibility issues with the windows 11 driver and display stack. Try using DXVK (which is what steam proton uses on Linux) to convert the driver stack into something vulkan compliant. For me, personally, it SIGNIFICANTLY reduced crashes even in windows 10. I'm rocking an AMD GPU though so my vulkan performance is notably more stable than many Nvidia equivalents. To use DXVK you just download the zip file from the GitHub releases page and drop it (extracted, 32 bit dll's specifically) into the folder with the game binaries (similar to old dinput override mods). Then launch the game like normal and it SHOULD "just work".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

+1 for the Tale of Two Wastelands mention. It’s the single greatest mod you can install, because it brings all of the quality of life improvements from New Vegas (like true iron sights) into FO3. Plus all the mods you install on FO:NV will also run on Tale of Two Wastelands, so you can actually get a decent playing experience.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wow that's an unpopular opinion for sure. You might get roasted for that one. What bugged you about it?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not OP but New Vegas always felt like a total overhaul mod for Fallout 3. Same assets, different location, different story, crashes a lot.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Basically was, Bethesda crippled Obsidian with a ridiculous target to release in so they had little to no time to work on new assets etc.

New Vegas is a great game despite its original flaws that in the years since, modders have completely fixed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no they didnt, obsidian crippled themselves by saying they can do it in 18 months and then mismanaging their time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, Obsidian has a bad habit of that. Crazy thing is they still managed to make one of the greatest RPGs of all time, crippled and short on development time.

Its a bit "theme parky", but the writing and narrative agency is just so good it's unreal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

its just a shame it could have been even better had they managed it better. i think it was j.e. sawyer who said they really fucked up by not doing the bug testing until it was way too late to fix everything

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, I'm ok with it it. It created a game more focused on story.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

For myself, I don't hate it, I just don't seem to get it like everyone else. I just leveled myself up and gave some weapons after a while because I found the combat unengaging and wanted to finish the story. I'm interested in trying out that mod pack someone else mentioned. Maybe the experience will be quite different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I liked NV way more than FO3 because it felt like the same world as FO1 and 2, while 3 felt like an imposter wearing their skin.

It also is the most RPG-like of all the 3D fallout games. Obsidian actually knows how to make an RPG. And having a couple of the people who made FO1 and 2 was a big help. To this day, Old World Blues has some of the best dialogue in a video game.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know what I've beaten more times, New Vegas or my meat. Either way that game stays installed on my PC, Steam Deck, Xboxes, everything. I ain't no fink, dig?

Honestly it's just amazing Obsidian was able to make that game's story and assets in 18 months with Bethesda looming over their necks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

no need to make up stories about the development, pretty much every obsidian dev cherished the opportunity to work on that engine and create a game

oh and obsidian themselves set the timeline and then mismanaged their time (like they usually do, see kotor 2)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

It's the last good fallout game, how can we move on if things after it are subpar?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I never played Fallout New Vegas.
It's sitting unused in my Steam library.
Is it actually any good?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

if you like fallout then yeah its good

if you dont like fallout or open worlds with a lot of talking to people then youll probably be bored out of your mind

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It has the best story of all the Fallouts, by-far. Really amazing what they managed to pull off with only 18 months of development time. But because of the rushed schedule, the game is also extremely buggy. I would not recommend playing it without mods that fix the bugs and restore missing content that wasn't finished in time for release. It also doesn't play well with modern OSes. Some people have had success running it on newer PCs but for me it's been hit or miss. Don't let that discourage you from trying it, though. It's such a good game that it's worth putting some effort into trying to get it to run.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

i spent hundreds of hours playing it across xbox 360 and PC.

PC is a better experience by far

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

There is a hard "yes/no" answer to this.

It looks like a first person shooter, so you might expect it to play like a fun FPS game. Is it fun in that way? No, not really. Mods can fix this a bit, but it will never be Doom 2016.

It is published by Bethesda, so you might expect it to have fun exploration like Morrowind, Oblivion, or Skyrim. Is it fun in that way? Kinda, but it's a bit theme-parky and the explorable world is less "open" than other Bethesda offerings. What you find is always fun, but the "getting there" part is only so-so. (Kinda the opposite of other Bethesda games this way)

So why is it still talked about so much and called a masterpiece then you might be asking? Well, in the spirit of the great CRPGs, the narrative agency is insanely good. Where many RPGs give you the illusions of choice, New Vegas is the ultimate "choose your own adventure".

While there is no "wrong way" to play a game, if you want to see why people love New Vegas, try to stop thinking about RPGs from the BioWare "paragon/renegade" dichotomy, and instead try to really consider, "what outcome do I want to happen", and New Vegas will surprise the shit out of you with how much agency they really give the player. In this way, it is one of the GOATs. (And I'm not talking about the exam)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a hell of a take, but I can kind of get it. It was definitely a mess at launch, and was a very different vibe from 3, which might rub you the wrong way if it's not what your preference is.

I do enjoy the shit out of it personally. Different strokes and everything though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Oh it's not a game I've ever called bad (or maybe I have in a fit of nerd rage, but never meant it), it's just a game that has never appealed to me after my first playing of it. I loved Fallout 3 because it allowed me to get my rocks off on one specific thing I love. Exploring a fucked up, post-apocalyptic, dystopian world. I loved sifting through the rubble and going into places no human has set foot in for a very long time. Exploring. Fallout 3 offered a lot of this. There were scattered settlements and a couple big cities but mostly just fucked up areas with monsters and secrets.

Then there was New Vegas. I do need to play it again to enjoy it for what it is, because I did enjoy it for what it was when I played it a while ago. I was just resentful because your options for exploring desolate areas are pretty far and few between. Most locations on the map have people already there of one faction or another or just a straight up town with bars, shops, etc. It is a great game for building those connections and the questy stuff and I do enjoy that type of game. But I was so hoping for more of the exploration that I got so let down I've just been avoiding the game ever since.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Fallout 3 is a post apocalyptic adventure game. New Vegas is a post post apocalyptic role playing game. I enjoyed the hell out of them both but largely for different reasons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've heard the same from a friend of mine, the exploration in 3 was one of the best parts of that game. I've played the other Bethesda games, but I don't think anything scratches that itch the same way, not even new vegas really did.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Too true. Bethesda really peaked with Oblivion and Fallout 3.

That's just my opinion, though. I know the Morrowind fans are having a good chuckle at what I just said 😅

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is kinda what I see from most people that dislike New Vegas. It's definitely not a post apocalyptic game.

In fact, before Fallout 3, 1 was the only real post apocalyptic game in the series imo. Fallout 2 is a continuation of the world's lore, so all the tribal villages have developed into societies. New Vegas expands upon this, with the societies becoming imperialist states.

So yeah, if you like exploring rubble then New Vegas is NOT the game for that, and Fallout 3 does that much better.

But, if you're more interested in how society would develop after the apocalypse, New Vegas definitely tackles that question head-on.

Fallout 3 was my first, and I do love all the insane shit you can find in the wasteland. It will always have a special place in my heart. But to me, the NPCs are what really give RPGs life, and New Vegas has some of the most well-written, realistically motivated people I've ever seen in video game format. While the Battle of Hoover Dam may not be as grandiose (even though you can put in the legwork to make it fucking awesome) as the Liberty Prime antics in 3, it feels like the culmination of decades of real conflict. It's not good guys vs bad guys, it's 4 distinct groups that all believe they have the best plan to carry humanity to the point at which it existed before the war. I love it for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I have well over 5k hours in fnv split between Xbox 360 and PC. I'm terrified there's never going to be a game like it again with the way everything is becoming a live service.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anyone who wants to play NV again/for the first time, check out Viva New Vegas, a modguide that makes the game actually playable and performant. There's now a Wabbajack version, meaning you can get it perfectly modded with very little user input.

I also recommend "Just Assorted Mods" if you want some modern QoL changes (sprinting, hit markers, weapon wheel, loot quickmenu, etc)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a modguide that makes the game actually playable and performant.

Can you elaborate? How is the game not playable without mods?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Playable" is a spectrum. First there's the usual compatibility problems that come with running an old game on modern PCs. Plus it's a notoriously buggy game running on a notoriously buggy, engine with DX9 code that did not scale well on the CPU.

With mods you get it to running flawlessly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I am not a gamer. I enjoyed fallout 4 a lot, though, and kept hearing all this hype for New Vegas. Legit bought that game thinking it was new. Lmao

What I've played has been good, though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I tried to play it but it’s coded so fucking poorly that it would regularly crash and I also got bug really early on that meant I could never interact with this one NPC, and that bug is apparently in the bone-stock, unmodded game!

Bethesda just makes dogshit products and it’s a shame when the story seems interesting but, like, I have better things to do then have my mediocre game crash again.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Crashes are all a part of the Bethesda experience, and until you embrace it, you'll never experience the joy their games have to offer lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

bethesda games give all gamers the "oh i walked 30m in game, time to quicksave again" instinct

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a simple man. If I see Whiterun, I quicksave.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, Bethesda said "you guys only need 18 months to make this game, right?" and Obsidian leadership said, "Yep."

Try the Viva New Vegas modlist sometime if ever you feel inclined. Pretty sure there's a Wabbajack installer (one click install). I still think New Vegas is phenomenal, even with the bugs, and I suffered through about 700 hours of constant crashing on PS3.

I recognize, though, that most people aren't so head over heels for the game that they won't suffer to experience it, nor will they take the time to mod it. But man, it really is worth even playing on vanilla.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nice to see someone else reccomend VNV! There is a Wabbajack installer, but there are some things you still need to do manually too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Meh. Games are mature now. Classics are classics. Just like movies.

Also, funny meme.

load more comments
view more: next ›