this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
348 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19608 readers
4096 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is pushing legislation to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, arguing the U.S. military and taxpayers secure the region, making it "our gulf."

Greene shared the proposal text on social media, calling for federal agencies to adopt the name change.

She linked the renaming effort to combatting Mexican cartel activity in the Gulf.

Trump supported the name change in a 2024 executive order, but there has been no indication of international adoption, including by the UK.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago (5 children)

We need to rename the Statue of Liberty to the Statue of America. In its current state it's just woke propaganda with a sign actively promoting illegal immigration. It's downright un-American.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They should name it what it was intended to be called: Egypt Carrying the Light to Asia.

But I'm not sure how many Americans would know that's it's actually a recycled hand me down.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Today I learnt. This is fantastic, thank you for sharing this knowledge.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I would not be surprised if Trump and his party tried to remove it because it represents a woke DEI ideology.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago

Bets on whether or not she even knew where the Gulf of Mexico was this time last week?

[–] [email protected] 105 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You know what? Let her have her little hissy fit. Let the Republicans send an unenforceable bill to Trump's desk so he can sign it with his tiny Sharpie. The more time they spend working on things that are irrelevant, the less time they have to do the really evil shit.

Democrats should take up their full debate time to say "This is stupid" over and over. Nobody is obligated to listen to us, and not even Trump will nuke London over it.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The problem is they are doing the evil shit quietly in parallel to this clown show, so everyone is distracted by the absurdity and not paying attention to the man behind the curtain.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yup, Trump is the loud distraction while the billionaires tear up and loot the government.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And good bye civil liberties

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

I am an old man originally from Texas. Its name is the Gulf of Mexico and I'm going to dead name it until the day I die.

This whole naming process is a smoke screen for the criminal and fascist bullshit the Trump Administration & friends are trying to pull.

I hope Tecciztecatl or Coyolxauhqui takes offense to this and slams the Moon into the Earth like Majora's Mask. This world is too stupid to live.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If the right-wing is good at one thing, its distraction. All this stuff about the Gulf of Mexico, Canada, and Greenland is just plain noise designed to detract from Trump fucking around with Trans right, pulling out of the Paris Agreement (again), and all the other insidious bullshit he and his cronies are working away at

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Also, the transpanic stuff and the climate stuff is ALSO a distraction and that is this - the MAIN agenda is to enrich donvict and all his cronies, and do jack shit about the price of eggs. Oh, which are actually going up.

The dipshits that voted for him because "he do good economy" and the price of eggs need lots of distractions right now. The broligarchs would love to make money like they did under Covid and they would love to see idiots that voted for donvict suffer.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Is the price of eggs down yet?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As funny as that is, it's actually someone that is going to set Trump up for undeserved success.

When the shortage subsides, the egg prices will go down, even if nothing else does. He'll gloat so much....

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If bird flu is contained then the shortages will stop. Or we could defund everything, let it run wild until it jumps to humans, and make covid look like a wet fart. Which direction are we running in?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

"Let the brain worm bearer decide." - Orange-dalf

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue 45 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Did inbred lady make more noise?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I demand an IQ test for individuals running for Congress.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Also EQ test and psychopathy test

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

Setting it at 50 and above would be a great start

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The only way she is going to force the UK into using that stupid name is if they invade and conquer the UK.

[–] Canadian_anarchist 8 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Another country to add to Trump's annexation list.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Republicans are so stupid. They don't know how anything works.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are just stirring up trouble, so people will pay attention to that narrative, rather than all the ways that they are stealing the country blind.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It's soo dumb.

The "Gulf of Mexico" was named before the country was officially named Mexico. The "Gulf of America" was historically a gulf in eastern Russia.

Both Mexico and USA are part of North America, so I suppose the name makes sense, but why do the republicans think it's a patriotic thing for them? Why is New York named after a town in England? Why don't they rename it to... "America" and change the name of he state to "America"

[–] Canadian_anarchist 5 points 5 days ago

While they're Americanizing names, they might as well bring back Liberty Cabbage and Freedom Fries.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Henceforth all cities, states, towns and rivers will be called America. The United Americas of America.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No, I'll continue to deadname the Gulf.

[–] HikingVet 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not deadnaming. It's the name the body of water chose. The Trump administration is forcing it adopt an assigned named that doesn't fit its identity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why do we still let this woman talk? I can see the instant over night fame if someone smacked her in the mouth the moment she inhaled to say something stupid.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

SHE IS A LAWMAKER

I'm getting real fucking tired of these "why are we paying attention to this person?" comments... Dude, these people are deciding our future. Our lives are literally in their hands. That's why I'm fucking paying attention.

You think I want to have to follow this shit? It has probably taken years off my life.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dumbfuckistan wants us to call what what now?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

The Gulf of America.

If you think about it, it actually makes sense. We'd be staking a claim to something we have no right to and we've filled it with garbage and oil. We've done so much damage to it, that it's barely recognizable compared to 100 years ago.

It's pretty much Water USA.

If y'all have any other bodies of water you think should be named after us, go ahead and do it! A puddle with a dead bird in it, your toilet, your uncle's piss-filled pants after he passed out from too many beers. USA! USA! USA!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago

Mexicans were there first. They got dibs on the name.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"Pennsylvania Dutch" means German ancestry because when people asked where they were from, they said Deutschland.

And the Dutch being from Holland didn't exactly make sense either.

So trump and the Republicans might be able to make American federal Agencies call it that...

But absolutely no one else has to follow suit

Different countries call things different names. And only incredible ignorant people don't understand that in 2025

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Trump supported the name change in a 2024 executive order [...]

Ummm, what?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago

How did Trump support the name change in a 2024 executive order if he wasn't president during any of 2024? I don't remember Biden signing that order for him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

Oh, yeah. Egg prices bout to drop in 1456...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

The US government has no ability to force nane changes on internationally recognized names for bodies of water

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

The name "change" hasn't even been adopted by the United States own government, because the president does not have that authority. Congress granted that authority to the US Board of Geographic Names in 1890. I suppose Congress could rename it if they passed a bill that the president signed into law overriding that authority for that specific case, but until they did so, it's not official.

Here is the link to the US Geographic Names Information system page showing the current official name of the Gulf of Mexico: https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/558730. Note the list of accepted variant names, which still doesn't include "Gulf of America".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (5 children)

@MicroWave I'm rather impressed with the UK on this. I had expected them to cave immediately.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

She linked the renaming effort to combatting Mexican cartel activity in the Gulf.

How in the hell would a name change do anything? Was that the only Mexican-related thing you could come up with when asked why the need for a name change?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Can we stop this fucking stupidity?

[–] YurkshireLad 16 points 6 days ago

You had your chance…..

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›