this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
187 points (86.1% liked)

Fediverse

30495 readers
606 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi folks! I'm here with another idea. Let's make an amazon alternative. I know! I know! That was asked for a couple times already but lets discuss some details.

Amazon is basically glorified dropshipping by now. What if we just made federated (not sure if over activitypub would work) ads and sales, powered by fediseer (the "trust" network of the fediverse).

Example 1: So you buy at toms groceries, you trust them. they have experience with tina's hardware store and they trust them. so you can buy both toms and tinas wares on both sites.

Example 2: So for example, I run a small business that sells computers. You run a small business that sells mice and keyboards. I have worked with you before so I mark you as trusted in my local website, which federates with yours, showing your products in my shop. If a customer buys my computer and buys your keyboard on top, my site sends you a buy order with customer address and payment. I get a small fee for my electricity of say 1%.

Can someone try and poke holes in this idea? It feels like this could work!

Have a nice weekend.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

You don't seem to understand the retail operations of Amazon. They provide logistics and marketing services to retailers, they also directly compete against those retailers because those retailers can't do better at logistics and marketing without using Amazon's services.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wasn't a federated Amazon just a mall, in a way?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

A mall is a private real estate instrument built by speculators to extract rent from businesses and it's actually rather predatory. This is fundamentally not real estate and fundamentally does not exist to extract rent, so it's more like "what if you took a mall and removed all the mall-ness from it".

If malls were collectively owned by the stores that comprise them and pieces of the mall could appear and disappear at will of whoever's participating... Is it actually even still a mall really???

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Good point!

The mall was still centralized and most shops didnt have their own place and a stall ij the mall but I can totally see where you're coming from.

It might be a good idea to keep this in mind if this ever becomes reality and we need marketing ideas. :)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Decentralized sales platforms would just suck to use, in general. The Amazon problem is likely something that can only be solved by the legislative processes of the countries it operates in.

Imagine Ebay but with even less scam prevention.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Instead of Amazon. Id do fediverse equivalent of Craigslist and Facebook marketplace. Which technically exists in. Europe it just needs to be imported to the US

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As you said, it exists. You can just clone it from codeberg and run it. Here's an article about it https://wedistribute.org/2024/08/flohmarkt-federated-market/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm having a *someone should do it just not me" moment. It looks like each instance is for different European country. Wonder if it would be for individual States

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I don't follow, sorry. In the meantime I put up an instance. Check out https://freebay.giftedmc.com/

The project is pretty small but I'm fairly confident it will grow.

I'll test it for some time and thing about pro's and cons of working with this project instead of forking or building something new.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I really don't see the appeal of activity-pub for this.

It's a protocol used for social media and interactions. You describe just sort of a "metastore".

Maybe a review store site could work better with activity pub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Reading the post, I found what I really want right now: a federated review platform. Too many times I want to look for a product, and has to look into a reddit thread to see a recommendation. There should be one, right? Where is it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If it involves money, it has the incentive to game the system. So each instance would be dealing with multiple attempts from actors adding fake reviews, sabotaging competitors, endless spam etc. If it can be easily automated, the service would be 24/7 filled with AI spam and drive away all users, defeating the purpose entirely.

The only trustworthy reviews are from people who actually bought the product in the website, because then it has a negative incentive to spend that much money for one fake review.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Argh, that connects it to the shopping platform. I wish there is a way around amazon..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reading the post, I found what I really want right now: a federated review platform.

[email protected] is a general review site. It currently covers media but, if you can get the data in (SKUs?) I can't see a reason it couldn't cover other products.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thanks a lot! Bummer that it is primarily for media. I wish it had more publicity/popularity, is there any way I can help?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

It's not a bunker per se, it is just that, if you are a review platform, the easiest initial targets would be Goodreads, IMDb, etc. Other types of stuff to review may take a little longer. However, if you can get access to a source of unique IDs, it may be possible to import the information. As it is written in Python there will be knowledgeable folks around who can better advise on this. I'd suggest post about it here: [email protected]. See what other people think about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it makes sense. It would allow a decentralized unified search across all stores. With Lemmy I can search posts as long as the instance is federated. With this I could find products.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In this example instances are stores, stores are users in instances? How stores are protected to be defederated by competitors (we are talking about money and making a living here).

What it adds to just a simple centralized service that any store can join. If you don't want it to be another amazon, make that service a coop. or some kinds of non-profit that it's paid by the stores that want to become part of that.

I think here we are in the classic conundrum of "a solution in search of a problem".

Fediverse and ActivityPub is cool, but it's a social media thing. And decentralization is cool when needed, for instance social media. But it doesn't have to make sense for every use case.

For what's being proposed there's zero actual need for decentralization or ActivityPub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Instances are stores (think Amazon or Etsy). Products are posts. Sellers are users.

Stores aren't protected from being defederated. You can still search Google or whatever, still visit the site and buy stuff. It just will not be a unified search, just like how anything else works with ActivityPub.

The good stores would be run by admins who don't have an incentive to defederate from others. Stores don't make money or take a cut from sellers anyway. The sellers aren't in charge of the instance, just like an Etsy seller can't do anything about the fact that they have competitors on Etsy.

The need for decentralization is that the store / Amazon / Etsy is broken up but the search and interactions, reviews, etc. are unified.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Those admins are unpaid?

Managing a store it's a LOT of work. And you are doing to provide profit for other people. Who is going to do it for free?

It's not like social media where people may volunteer to admin and mod, and users may donate because it's a common goal of share information, opinions, knowledge, funny stuff etc.

Here we are talking about bussiness that do what they do because they want money. I would not volunteer to admin a store so shop owners could earn money, that's for sure.

And I still not see the advantage of doing within the ActivityPub instead of just being a normal service where all interested shops could join.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

What about the online food ordering market. I reckon that might be an easier first step than consumer products. Here in the Netherlands JustEatTakeaway has a market share of around 90% and requires restaurants to give them a 14% provision. Restaurants don't have much of a choice, if they're not on there they miss out on a huge part of the market, it's like they don't exist. Why don't restaurants unite and develop a FOSS protocol that let's them federate, so the consumer has a central place to browse the food delivery market, but simultaneously makes the providers independant because they can run their own instance if they please. Have these types of ideas been pitched to branche organizations? Restaurants have a clear interest to develop this to free themselves from the platforms with a monopolistic venture-capital-driven strategy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I fully agree that this would be a valid application. The reason any company doesnt adopt such strategies is the cost of pioneering it. Most companies who spearhead such an idea want it to pay off -> proprietary. Also most people are specialized in their industry. Developing an app is not native to food industry for example.

load more comments
view more: next ›