this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
150 points (97.5% liked)

Canada

9081 readers
1942 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] discomatic 4 points 15 hours ago

And he can 100% gargle my balls

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Canada, stop resisting! Don't you want "all this"?! Don't you want a government focused on destroying the department of education for your kids?

[–] ninthant 79 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Not directed at you, OP — but unwanted “annexation” is invasion and we should use the real words even if they frighten us.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He probably doesn’t know the difference between conquering and annexing. I wish I was kidding but it might be true.

[–] ninthant 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He pals around with Danille Smith, Kevin O'Leary, and folks from lil PP's team. So it's not entirely surprising that someone as stupid as Trump would think that Canadians are on board with this idea. His personal experience validated it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The dude freed Andrew Tate. I don’t need to know anything else. Donald trump is a fucking scumbag and I hope he dies sooner rather than later. Hopefully it happens in a plane together with musk and Vance.

[–] npcknapsack 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hurry up with the new Air Force 1, Boeing!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Left wing ejector system test #1237.....it works! I can't believed it!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah! Find extra corners to cut! Time is money!

[–] theacharnian 4 points 1 day ago

Nah, it's not the same thing. Donald is talking about diplo-annexing us. Or in less gamy terms, he's talking about a hostile takeover.

[–] jerkface 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, it is not. Invasion is a military incursion. Annexation is not a military incursion. If one sounds less bad than the other, you're reading that in. People aren't minimizing by referring to annexation and invasion as different things.

[–] SpaceCowboy 2 points 14 hours ago

Annexation can happen peacefully if a country agrees to it. Canada has rejected that, so a non-military annexation is off the table.

The other scenario when an annexation can occur is after it's occupied by a military. Before that happens there would need to be an invasion.

Since annexation has been rejected by Canada all talk of annexation now means the same as invasion and occupation, since that's the only scenario an annexation can happen now.

[–] ragepaw 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I keep saying that he isn't looking to annex, he's looking to conquer.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I always thought "annex" had a negative connotation to begin with.

[–] ragepaw 2 points 1 day ago

There can be peaceful annexation. East Germany, Newfoundland, Hawaii (debatable), Hong Kong, Alaska and more...

In those cases, both sides (mostly) agreed to the annexation. None were conquered (again, Hawaii is debatable).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. He calls himself a king. He couldn't beat a child in a game of chess, but like Napoleon he will only taste dust and blood in the end.

They have forgotten as close as they are to us, we are to them.

Washington's ego has been so inflated by her victories in the Middle East she is just as ignorant and stupid as the Russian leadership was to belive they could simply annex a massive country with minimal force.

America is creating a nightmare of her own making on both her borders. Only a fool would simultaneously open two fronts at once, alas....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Victories in the Middle East

I'm honestly not sure what this refers to in recent memory unless you're talking about the initial battlefield victories, executing Hussein, killing Bin Laden, or dropping MOAB to make ourselves feel better. We fled Afghanistan with our tails between our leg, left a power vacuum in our wake and the people to be ruled by their theocrats. It was godawful and we lost stupendously more than we gained at least in the public sector. Nice agitprop though I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yes, Americas tactical battlefield success has inflated and overshadowed the strategic failures.

I don't understand why you're offended. American politicians think the U.S. military can literally do anything at anytime or else they wouldn't be threatening half the world at once.

Lol agitprop fuck off bud. Washington been boming the Houthis for years doing fuck all and still making threats like this is the 1960's.

Americans are in for a reality check just like the Russian were.

[–] wampus 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If/when Alberta and Sask vote to defect, that's not an invasion. After losing them, and east/west trade is disrupted, forcing BC to also defect, it's not an invasion. If the US takes greenland, effectively fully encircling Canada and blocking most trade, causing the rest to 'vote' to defect, it's not an invasion.

It's crappy, and antagonistic/aggressive -- but if they don't move military troops in, and if the "choice" to defect is "voted for" by Canadians who are sick of being embargo'd and isolated etc, then... idk. I think "invasion" isn't right, and annexation seems more accurate.

[–] SpaceCowboy 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That's a fantasy and none of that is going to happen. We may as well talk about scenarios where Canada peacefully annexes the US if we're making things up.

Canada is not going to vote for being part of the US. Canada is not isolated, we're not the country screwing over allies, that's the US doing that. If your scare quotes around "voted for" implies a non-legitimate election, exactly who is going to be running those non-legitimate election in Canada? Are you referring to the sham elections Russia holds in occupied parts of Ukraine? That only happens because it's under military occupation by Russia. For there to be sham elections in Canada, the US would have to invade Canada to make that happen.

There is no scenario where Canada will be annexed by peaceful means. Canada has rejected all discussion on annexation. Talk of annexation are therefore threats of war now.

[–] wampus 1 points 14 hours ago

And yet the CBC is explicitly reporting on Smith as threatening a National Unity crisis.

Look, it took a while for people to wake up to the fact that Donald Trump "meant it" when he said crap, because what he was saying sounded so far out there. There's no reason to think differently of any politician, if they're saying really dangerous shit. A national unity crisis is basically saying she wants out of Canada if her demands aren't met And she has the support of 'most' Albertans, apparently, cause they voted her in, and her party still supports her and her actions. Like even if there's no 'recall' option for her as an MLA, if her party didn't want to follow the crap she's saying they could all just stop voting for her crap. Albertans aren't openly calling for her to get dethroned / booted. To think that they would not, potentially, vote to leave -- and/or not stoop to the level of dirty tricks like what we see in the states (Elon's reportedly paying people again in some election to skew the vote, and gettin away with it) -- is naive in my view.

If someone had said 10 years ago that the USA would be talking about annexing Canada, we would have called that a fantasy / no way it'd ever happen. But here we are.

[–] Auli 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fuck that about Alberta and Saskatchewan. First all of Alberta would not leave lots of treaty territory and I imagine they'd want to stick with Canada. Second if the province can separate why can't parts of Alberta separate to Canada.

[–] Sturgist 2 points 1 day ago

Have a look through their comments. Hardly the first shitty take they've had

[–] wampus 1 points 1 day ago

Quebec already set a precedent that Provinces can theoretically vote to separate. The Bloc Quebecois in the 90s held votes, and the claim then was that a simple 51% majority on the referendum would've triggered Quebec into declaring independence from Canada. The blocs remained a staple in Canadian politics ever since, historically promoting "Quebec First" and separatist values the whole time, with tons of support from people in Quebec -- one of the big surprises with the US rhetoric, is that Quebec is suddenly seeming more 'pro Canada', even while still electing a party who's roots are separatist. Canada's a federation of provinces, so it's theoretically possible for provinces to leave.

If Quebec can do that, there's no reason to think that other provinces can't do the same. And if Alberta were to hold such a referendum, and the vote showed 51% in favour of 'leaving' -- be it through semantic shenanigans on the phrasing of the question, or overt election manipulation aided by people like Musk -- it's unclear how the rest of Canada would react. Even more, if they did that, and Canada didn't let them "leave", the US could take that as a justification to help "free" the people and oil of Alberta.

Individual towns and regions might try to separate -- in the Quebec referendum, there'd been talks of the northern parts of QB wanting to stay in Canada. Practically though I don't imagine that'd happen. The division of powers between provinces and federal governments, and the authorities given them, are fairly clear cut. Towns and regions sorta just pop up at resource hubs within the province, and aren't as clearly demarked in terms of self governance / "the big" items for a nation. Again, we're a federation of provinces, but provinces aren't a 'federation' of cities.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago

Europe stands with Canada. This situation sucks so much. I hope France sends some nukes to extend the so called umbrella.

[–] CircaV 20 points 1 day ago

Never. He completely underestimates how much Canadians love being Canadian. I’d eat grass for the rest of my life and live outdoors - before I’d give up being Canadian.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donald Trump is 100% stupid

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

110% at minimum

[–] Showroom7561 22 points 1 day ago

"Deny and justify"

The comparisons made between Russia's attack and the plays that trump has been making should worry everyone.

[–] PandaParent 13 points 1 day ago

Well, duh. Canadians have known he was serious since before he was inaugurated.

[–] MyMotherIsAHamster 13 points 1 day ago

Mango Mussolini can go fuck himself.