this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
838 points (99.5% liked)

politics

22613 readers
5687 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The Government that hires by merit. :\

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Pete Hegseth is not top shelf, but his liquor is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know. And he's not a good hire for the merit based government either.

Do they know what that means?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

They don't care. They only care about owning the libs, killing brown people, and fucking up their own country... to own the libs (again). Pete Hegseth is so incompetent it isn't funny. He is also an astonishingly racist fellow. He even had a Tattoo that says kaffir. Which is odd because Muslims have never used it in the way he and many other islamophobes think it is used. Basically if you are a Jew or a Christian, you are not a kaffir. There is more to say, but I kept this comment in process for more than a day now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Nothing is going to happen right

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

With Kash Patel on the case, we can be rest assured hell for absolutely nothing about these idiots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Yup, that is a grade A f*ck up right there.

[–] [email protected] 200 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Read the full transcript. There is so much more that is being overlooked besides the "war plans" that were leaked.

  • Joe Kent: "I will send you the unclass data we pulled on BAM shipping" This indicates that Kent knew that this conversation was classified and that at least some people in the chat were not privy to at least some level of classified information.

  • JD Vance: "I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what – nobody knows who the Houthis are – which is why we would need to stay focused on: 1) Biden failed & 2) Iran funded.". He's basically acknowledging what they're doing is complete bullshit, but it won't matter as long as they blame Biden for it.

  • JD Vance: "1) this leaks, and we look indecisive;". I don't even know what to say here.

  • Michael Waltz: "Per the president’s request we are working with DOD and State to determine how to compile the cost associated and levy them on the Europeans.". In other words "We're bombing Yemen, and Europe's gonna pay for it."

  • JD Vance: "I just hate bailing Europe out again.". I think this is a highly under-reported line in this whole debacle. It shows that the US position on Europe isn't just some political theater to appease Trump, but shows that the US (or at least, this administration's) disdain for Europe is very, very real. This is the geopolitical equivalent of finding out your best friend tells everybody that you're nothing but a freeloading loser when you're not around. Even if it stays quiet, this line will not go unnoticed, and will have a huge impact on US/EU relations going forward.

IMPORTANT EDIT: As I expected, these comments did not go unnoticed. European leaders are already rethinking their relationships with the US in response to not only this entire scandal, but also the specific comments made by JD Vance since it gives evidence of the true feelings of the Trump administration.

  • JD Vance: "And if there are things we can do upfront to minimize risk to Saudi oil facilities we should do it.". Good to know where his priorities are. Gotta protect that Saudi oil. Innocent civillians? Fuck 'em. They're not nearly as important as that sweet, sweet black gold.

  • Pete Hegseth: "VP: I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.". See above. This is going to have a huge damping effect on our relations with our European allies going forward, as it reinforces the fact that US disdain for Europe is real and not just political theater for cameras.

So in other words, they're bombing Yemen because Europeans are freeloaders, and if anybody asks why we're even doing this just blame Biden.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do you have the text of the 'did not go unnoticed' article, as it is paywalled for me

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

From the article, bolding mine:

"There are demands now for both Mr Waltz, who has been described by a White House official as a “f—ing idiot”, and Mr Hegseth to resign, which – given the seriousness of the security breach - should be the minimum required of them. But what must we conclude about JD Vance, who joined in the sneering at what are supposed to be his country’s chief allies with such gusto? And what about the future of our security operations? Do we continue to supply highly sensitive intelligence to a White House which holds us in contempt and might just accidentally broadcast critical information to random contacts?

And the biggest question of all: whose side is America on now? The “pathetic” Western countries with which it supposedly shares a democratic tradition or its new friend, Vladimir Putin, with whom it could comfortably carve up the world?"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

I ran a roleplay spy organization that had tighter INFOSEC and OPSEC than this.

[–] tempest 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then whinging about messaging is hilarious to me. It's not like they have ever been good at it it's just their portion of the electorate has been eating lead paint and accepts basically anything.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They were basically saying as much in the chat. A couple of times. If anyone asks any questions, just blame Biden because they know their base will accept it.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (16 children)

European here: we did not ask for your help, we do not particularly want you to bomb the houthis (or anyone in the Middle East for that matter).

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 168 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I’m watching the hearing now. Democrats are ROASTING them and calling for their resignations, while Republicans are asking them about China and Mexico and praising their first months in position. It’s disgusting.

The NSA explicitly advised them all against the use of Signal back in February, citing recent breaches of the platform by Russian hackers. Two of them were in Moscow at the time the strikes were communicated, one being Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence.

Edit: The lottery assigned Judge Boasberg to their trial. It’s a good day.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There is obviously an easy fix for this. Get rid of the NSA, CISA, and other cybersecurity people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

one being Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence

...and Kremlin mouthpiece and asset

Good times, good times.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We need more than resignations. We need actual punishments. Can't have them just resign and go on to be a private consultant or talking head.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 114 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Signal itself is not vulnerable. This article needs to correct itself. Signal is only vulnerable if the DEVICE THAT USES IT is compromised. Using devices that can be compromised is the issue here. Do not use that device to discuss anything confidential if you are in the government.

This is not Signal's fault at all.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There is no doubt in my mind that their phones are compromised.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 week ago (9 children)

They’re refusing to use government issued devices. They’re all using personals. This was an issue last time around, too. There’s a whole fucking division of the government (that I’m sure they’re hollowing out now) whose job it is to make sure people who need secure devices have them and use them.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But a presidential administration is required to keep classified records, and records of all meetings in general.

It may take decades of FOIA requests, but those records are SUPPOSED TO BE KEPT, not deleted forever after 7 days.

This regime using Signal is a major red flag and a permanent information black hole.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 109 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vance responded a minute later: “Excellent.” Thirty-five minutes after that, Ratcliffe, the CIA director, wrote, “A good start,” which Waltz followed with a text containing a fist emoji, an American-flag emoji, and a fire emoji.

You cannot make this shit up

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're like a bunch of frat boys trying to outdo each other in their edgy hot take. They're creating their own tiny echo chamber where it is cool to hate on other Western countries and admire Russia.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Signal is a publicly available app that provides encrypted communications, but it can be hacked.

This is misleading statement that will only confuse people who want to use a secure messenger.

To clear things up with anyone who's not technically inclined: Anything can be theoretically hacked. Signal has not been hacked and has no history of being compromised.

The Signal "hacks" that linked people's Signal client to devices that aren't theirs were sophisticated phishing/spoofing attacks. The equivalent of getting someone to click a malicious link via email because it looked like the real thing.

A reminder that you still need to do your due diligence even when using a secure service. Technology alone cannot completely protect you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is an article about an article. The original Atlantic article that contains the messages themselves is here

load more comments
view more: next ›