this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1325 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
6559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

More proof Rainbow Capitalism was a lie/ad campaign to take more money from queers.

I wish I could rub this in the face of every cishet who said Rainbow Capitalism was actual progress.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(For reference: I am cishet, but have family & friends in the LGBTQ+ community and consider myself an ally.) Usually just lurk, but I feel you so badly.

I've been saying it forever as well. They're spending millions, to specifically target/advertise/appeal to the community... out of the goodness of their hearts? Right.

Then as soon as its "over", the facade drops and its on to the next big event/target market. Rinse and repeat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

As a cishet I saw it what was as soon as they started it. It was about 10-15 years ago. It was sleazy then, and it's sleazy now. They are just trying to milk the population as much as they can. They don't give two fucks about inclusiveness or equality. They know a large portion of Americans want equality. So it's a cash cow.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, in the past companies wouldn't be caught dead associating with LGBTQ+ people, let alone take their money. Now LGBTQ+ is acceptable enough for predatory advertising so...idk progress from like a fucked up capitalist perspective I guess?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Haha absolutely, I'm also one of the people who always said all this rainbow and green washing is bullshit. As if they ever cared for anything.

Capitalism has no values, except for one: shareholder value. Yesterday they help sending people to concentration camps, today they help saving the world and increasing diversity, yeah, totally convincing.

There is one thing to rely on with capitalism - if you convince people you can make good money with it or it is good for the brand, they will jump onto it and squeeze the shit out of it. An abstract, amoral force, made from a large number of concrete shitty people.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It's almost impressive how quickly the whole of the business world capitulated to Donald Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

They didn't capitulate. They were mostly faking it all along, friend. It made for good profit at the time and to get good Blackrock or Vanguard investment money. This is why despite putting rainbows in X, or FB, or YT, or LinkedIn profiles in the USA or in some Western countries, no company ever did that in any profile outside the West. It was all for show... and money. If they actually believe it they would have done so across the board. Yet they didn't. They were just hoping most people wouldn't notice. Many did. There was a meme RE: this floating around from years ago, too.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (10 children)

It’s almost like their support for these issues was never genuine to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Exactly. :-/

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's too hard to change anything, but only if it's progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Well. Being a bigoted asshole is easy.

Actually being inclusive and nice to people takes effort.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

This is what's fucking shitty about this

Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

It's like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

They didn't capitulate. They never fought. They just did what was the best shot at earning money and gaining ground at the time.

Don't ever expect moral based behavior in capitalism or geopolitics.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Slavishly Follow the Fascist Government's Lead

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

If you don't use the strikeout, you can save millions of dollar on toner/ink from not printing out an extra word at a corpo that big. I think I deserve a promotion for that insight as well, well worth the extra money!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Keep using uorigin for blocking as. Also use Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Switch to AdNauseam.

It clicks ads in addition to blocking them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does this achieve other than funneling money from companies' advertising budget to Google a little faster?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

It undermines the integrity of the digital advertising ecosystem while providing additional income for website operators.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They also allowed a pedo back on their platform

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm a little bit confused on this: if you visit the policy page now it does (at least for me, in Europe) still list "Sex, Gender, or Sexual Orientation" as a protected group in that exact same list. Obviously slightly different as they've combined a couple of different groups in there where previously they were delineated: plus I wonder if this is potentially showing because I'm in a different region. Would be interested to see what someone in NA sees: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939

EDIT: Nevermind, saw further in the thread

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Man this whole anticipatory compliance with the fascist regime shit is fucking awful

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (9 children)

First reddit now youtube. Welcome to the tech broligarchy

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (11 children)

It's time to boycott Google as well now hu? Already ditched their search engine and moved to kagi

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention 'sex, gender, or sexual orientation', which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skisnow 79 points 2 days ago (3 children)

When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it's time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Probably because no one is actually using any gender identity based bigotry any more. So they might as well just remove it, it saves space. /s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Look at the latest executive order on "protecting children". They are planning for eugenics.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (10 children)

And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

Look who's laughing now.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›