this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
482 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

8124 readers
1555 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof 101 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The wealth was never meant to trickle down. That was just a line to keep the proles subservient and waiting.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@floofloof @RandAlThor

Yup. Reagan and Thatcher just did what their rich friends wanted them to do, and fucked us and the earth for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Macron is doing that to France right now. It's not gonna be pretty.

[–] EhForumUser 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That was just a line to keep the proles subservient and waiting.

Huh? The trickle down line comes from comedian Will Rogers who was making a joke about how President Hoover, who was an engineer, was accustomed to water trickling down, but that he didn't realize money trickles up.

It was a line to serve the exact opposite – to tell the 'proles' that the economic plan was fundamentally flawed.

[–] teuast 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah, but it was repurposed for that. "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" also has its origins in a saying referring to something that is impossible, but was later repurposed into having the opposite connotation for most people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Also when conservatives quote MLK about 'judging people by the content of their character', and nothing else.

[–] floofloof 12 points 2 years ago

Thanks. I learned something. I grew up hearing it discussed seriously in the 1980s, by which time I'm not sure everyone remembered the critical origin you identify. As I remember it, during the Reagan/Thatcher years many people treated the matter of whether and how the wealth would trickle down as a real live question.

[–] snoons 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only thing trickling down is piss. People still drink it though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Double the fent high I hear. Did somebody say something about an opiate crisis?

[–] TemporaryBoyfriend 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In other news, water is wet. Heat... hot!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

The only news here is that it's in the news.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And it was just a rebranding of horse and sparrow economics, a 19th century concept. It was always a scam, they just made sure the media was never allowed to criticise it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

@jonne @Deckshermorgan

It's why they bought almost all the media companies.

The medium is the message (or massage). Always has been.

[–] cyberpunk007 9 points 2 years ago

And fuck you. Fuck me. And fuck the 99%. That's all we have to show for it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Phil_in_here 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Breaking news! New 2023 studies find that Y2K did little to negatively impact technology.

[–] corsicanguppy 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bad example.

In some cases, a LOT of shit was fixed up in a massive crunch to ensure it wouldn't fall over. Like shit-in-space kinda stuff as well as stuff that makes sure you have heat and light and hot clean water.

It was a massive effort for some orgs and, grace of God and hard work, you never noticed.

[–] Phil_in_here 1 points 2 years ago

That's very true. I was struggling to think of a comparably equally obvious problem that isn't worth mentioning every few months with a new "study".

I was going to say climate change, but that is worth mentioning and studying as much as possible, even though it's been known exactly what's happening and why we're the ones driving it to happen for literally longer than anyone living person today.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If Canada has to use the United States as an example of the consequences of bad behavior, so as to prevent Canada from making the same mistakes ; then I support it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Feels like that's a not insignificant part of our national identity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Let's be honest, a forced contrast with America is most of Anglo Canadian identity.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

I'm shocked, I tell you. SHOCKED!

[–] zcd 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We should take it from them now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

At least now there is a study that corroborates what we’ve been saying for decades. So, we’ve got that going for us. Right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Well color me surprise-

Ah shit nobody can afford color anymore

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

For those just realizing, that this was the plan...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

well lets try another 50 just to be sure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

What really????1??!

Good to have hard numbers, I guess.

[–] zephyreks 1 points 2 years ago
[–] MapleEngineer 1 points 2 years ago

Rich people: Give us all the money and we'll let you have a little.

Liberal voters: Fuck off!

Conservative voters: Ok!

Liberal voters: We told you so.

Conservative voters: Any day now...

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The economy has changed tremendously since Reagan was in office. I think in order for the US economy to improve we need to accept we are a just a part of the global economy and enforce fair trade.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Free trade was always just a shiny feel good label for allowing the ruling class of America to exploit cheap labor who have less protections in foreign countries to increase profit margins. But hey, we paid them a pittance to pollute their land and work 20 hours days. Fair trade.

[–] jerkface 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Funny, that's not how free trade between the US and Canada worked out. The US got all our manufacturing, because the US is a shitty place that exploits poor low cost laborers who have less protection than competing workers in Canada.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not sure about all that...Big business making sweat shops and the American government demanding equal trade aren't the same at all. If whatever country chooses to not regulate their factories and work practices that, again, is not the fault of the US government. Fair trade in a global market should be the only standard or trade.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The free trade argument is based on the economic theory of comparative advantage. This just ends up being a measure of which market can be most effectively exploited for gain from every smaller nation a country like the US trades with.

These smaller countries end up producing a disproportionate amount of a small category of goods. Efficiency is good right? Well, it is until there's some form of economic disruption or downturn that suddenly lowers demand for that good. Then suddenly all the other things the country doesn't focus on are extremely expensive as the local currency devalues and they can't afford food and other core goods which they don't produce enough of. Hey, good news though, now their labor is even cheaper and we can have them work for pennies making something else so they don't starve.

Fair trade means the government doesn't interfere and tax things, it's the same thing as free trade. It's a really great system. For billionaires who own companies and would love to own slaves if they could. This is the next best thing though.