this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
486 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

15539 readers
3126 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Is "tree" some kind of notation?

[–] [email protected] 98 points 2 months ago (3 children)

TREE is an extremely fast-growing function in set theory. TREE(1) equals 1, TREE(2) equals 3, and TREE(3) equals a number so large that its lower bound easily dwarfs Graham's Number.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago

its lower bound easily dwarfs Graham's Number.

Yo you don’t gotta throw shade on Grahams number like that, it’s doing its best

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Well, that escalated quickly.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Yes, TREE(3) is larger than a googolplex or even graham’s number.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why do I always feel like I need a PhD to understand even the first paragraph of Wikipedia articles about math. Is that just me?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

yeah where's the Simple English Wikipedia article for Graham's number

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Graham’s number is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to Graham’s number.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Go get your PhD and write one yourself!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What about our friend TREE(Graham's Number)

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Numberphile did a video on TREE(g~64~) so you gotta go bigger.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Needs more recursion
Also is your username from stormlight archive?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also is your username from stormlight archive?

:)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Justice for phenadora 😭

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee 2 points 2 months ago

TREE(yomomma)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (14 children)

That article is not comprehensible to most people

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P6DWAwwViU

Here is a Numberphile video that describes how large a number we are talking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I get it now!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Math meme ... it's a math meme!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is math related to science?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I don't think so, science deals with reality and math are just floating around

/joke

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

man hes gone have to do a lot of walking again... Offtopic: The funny thing is TREE(3) is an absurdly long distance, independent of the physical unit. Even TREE(3) times the planck length is unimaginable long, as the ratio between a meter and the planck length is absolutely neglectable against such super large numbers.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

It's so large that the number of digits it has is too large to represent, and the number of digits in that number is too large to represent, and so on for a number of times that is also far too large to represent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

So the only way it's worth taking about it is in memes right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Let's say you have to move to the infinite room. How can someone check out of the hotel?

[–] wise_pancake 34 points 2 months ago

There is no infinity room, but there is an infinity pool

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can check out any time you like

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The only issue is that if I have to travel to an infinite distance to the lobby, I'll never check out.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, you can never be put in a room with an infinite number, only an arbitrarily large one. That's the idea of the hotel; it has an infinite number of rooms, but every room has a finite number, since you can count forever without reaching infinity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Whew, I was worried as the infinite passanger on that bus that I'd be put into an infinite room.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Just move halfway to the lobby, then again halfway to the lobby and...

...shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Just put a sign on the door telling everyone who comes there to go to the inverse wing. Or go set up in the inverse wing of the hotel yourself.

Everyone in the place is moving right along the infinite axis... But there's a whole empty wing of the hotel if you go left at the front desk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

That's my secret, I'm always moving.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

legendary ball knowledge

load more comments
view more: next ›