this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
1039 points (98.8% liked)

pics

20075 readers
449 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Silly Canada. You’re not suppose to say that you put up the billboard. You’re suppose to run it through a various political organizations like “Americans For a Better Future” or American Families for Prosperity“.

[–] epicstove 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I get what they're saying but I think the "Paid for by the government of canada" might be misinterpreted...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm all for proper attribution, but I think making it just a little smaller, or two lines so it doesn't line up with the main message, could have made it more clear that it wasn't part of the message.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think it is part of the message, Canada was pushing back against the tariffs USA was imposing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know it took me half a second. Adding "poster" in front, or something would make in unambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

"the only thing the government of Canada is paying for is this ad"

[–] wirebeads 125 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

It’s incredible how people just don’t understand how tariffs work, but believe an aging man with early onset dementia’s and wears a diaper.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Early-onset? He is 78

[–] adarza 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

he's one of their peers, at least in the 'education department'.

"Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had." - William T. Kelley, Marketing Professor, Wharton School @ UPenn

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

"This was a major, major thing with Trump — that people might think he’s stupid"

Lmao

That worked sooooo well for him. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Bizarre thing is, while this should be seen as a denunciation - his base will just love it.

The longer I'm alive the more I think of MAGA as just Squidbillies.

[–] Punchshark 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Education ends after birth in murica

[–] ZeroCool 19 points 1 day ago

Yep, Republicans have spent decades dismantling public education brick by brick and MAGA is the end result.

[–] Albbi 10 points 1 day ago

Education comes from the Fox News channel in 'murica.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These Tariffs are not approved by Congress, so they are taxation without representation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s not quite what that phrase means, but I like the spirits

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's approaching that point.

If the executive ignores the law and the other branches of government, we effectively no longer have a representative government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yes. This is pretty much the spirt of it.

The founding fathers probably could not have predicted some idiot MFer ping-ponging tariffs on and off so him and his buddies could do some insider trading and destroy the economy.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tariff charges are paid by the importer, not the exporter. Adding huge tariffs to Chinese manufactured goods can only hurt American companies who rely on Chinese engineering and manufacturing expertise.

This is a charge that American companies will have to pay and it is the people of the US who will foot the bill for additional costs.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I watched a 3 hour video the other day about how this has killed affordable PC computing in the US, and there's no undoing the damage now. The effect is on a time delay based on the material supply chain and will hit soon.

Reference: https://youtu.be/1W_mSOS1Qts

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Hearing it from real people running the real companies we’re used to hearing about in reviews or even being a patron of, really helps bring the reality of what’s happening front and center. Its also fascinating seeing the insulation of the larger companies like Corsair and how different but also alike they speak about the uncertainty of the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Adding huge tariffs to Chinese manufactured goods can only hurt American companies

This is not how economics work. It will MOSTLY hurt American companies. But it will also hurt the Chinese manufacturers because of the fast change in demand. It can even hurt 3rd party countries because these Chinese companies might now dump these goods on the market which in turn could hurt their competitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thank you for running these, Canada! Too many of my fellow Americans are clueless about tariffs and how they are taxes that Americans pay. While the MAGA cultists are lost, there are many others who would have voted against Donvict Dementia if they knew what a tariff was back in October/November 2024. It helps now too because Republican Senators like Mike Lee and John Curtis need to be pressured to impeach donOLD Krasnov, for the benefit of both the States as well as our dear Canadian friends. It's appalling to see Republicans who pretend to be against unnecessary taxes supporting or standing silent on an issue that Republicans used to be solidly AGAINST.

[–] Punchshark 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure my dead goldfish has a higher iq than Maga combined

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It certainly is more cultured than them, at least.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How does anyone with an IQ above 70 not know this?? Are these billboards really necessary? What do they think tariffs are if not for a tax?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I work with tariffs daily but there are tons of people who are clueless. I think if you quiz the average person on the street and ask them how tariffs work, most of them will fail to define it correctly. A surprisingly large number don't know it's a tax on the importer. A surprisingly large number don't even know it's a type of tax.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Republican when they see this: "yeah but JJOOOEEEEE BIIIDEN!"

[–] Phil_in_here 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Joe Biden immediately tanked the economy to enrich himself and his cronies!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I hope this is a billboard on the Canadian side of the border that's pointing towards the US.

[–] cheeseburger 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Damn, they're putting up posters in regions known for their illiteracy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The fact that it says "Paid for by the Government of Canada" will allow them to shrug it off as propaganda and go "Why would Canada care so much if this was true!?". I like the idea, but I fear it might have an even more polarizing effect...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be hilarious, honestly.

[–] grte 26 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

It's probably IN the US. I made a post about one I saw a month ago. https://thelemmy.club/post/24183750

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are these billboards in the USA or Canada?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're at least in one US state because I've seen it while driving down the road.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They aren't, though specifically for groceries, it's somewhat-less relevant for the US than Canada, because we produce a wider variety of food domestically.

There are some important things that we do import, which have been discussed on here, like out-of-season fruits and vegetables.

kagis

These guys highlight several fields:

https://www.eatingwell.com/foods-impacted-by-new-tariffs-11712453

  • Tropical Produce

the US consumes more than it has tropical regions to grow tropical foods in.

  • Seafood

  • Coffee

  • Olive Oil, which we mostly get from Europe. "The U.S. produces only 2% of the olive oil that it consumes"

  • Chocolate

  • Nuts (though IIRC we're a major producer of some important nuts, like almonds and peanuts).

Also, the foods that we're especially competitive in tend to be bulk, low-value stuff, grains and such, which is the staple stuff that you'd really need if prices went up. We tend to import stuff like luxury food from Europe, which is nice but something that one could live without if one's budget was tight.

One impact will come from fertilizer, which we import a lot of; that'll drive up our cost of production of food.

The fact that we're a major exporter of food is actually a major reason why you'd expect the agriculture industry to be unhappy with Trump, though agricultural states tended to vote for him. American agriculture is, by-and-large, globally-competitive. If it were uncompetitive, then tariffs might benefit it, providing useful protection from competition by forcing American consumers to buy it rather than more-competitive foreign products. And despite the lack of benefit, the agriculture industry likely does get hit by countertariffs.

The industries that will tend to benefit from tariffs are those where America isn't very globally-competitive in 2025, maybe low-skill, labor-intensive manufacturing, and that's where consumers are going to take a price hit from taxation. Clothing prices, for example. We're not very good at hand-producing clothing. Tariffs will cause those industries to be subsidized by transferring money from the industries that we're better at.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your statement is only accurate if tire exclusively talking about the food being imported. American fertilizer ingredients and a lot of the equipment (or materials for the equipment) come from Canada and other countries hit by the tariffs. There was an article a month ago about how the Vermont maple syrup industry is totally screwed because all their equipment comes from Canada.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently these are real, but many have rotated out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›