this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
69 points (93.7% liked)

Canada

9591 readers
2223 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tleb 3 points 1 hour ago

I think the only people looking at riding projections or riding history are us nerds who discuss politics on lemmy. I think strategic voting in the general public is very real, but it seems to more take the form of "I normally vote NDP and will vote Liberal this time" rather than digging into the politics of their riding.

[–] lobut 2 points 3 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

Insert Obligatory Ranked Choice Voting Should Always be Used

[–] jerkface 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Would PR have fixed this, though? Or could those votes for Mike Morrice, who worked hard for his riding and deserved another session in Parliament, simply have gone to elect some other Green in a floating seat?

With a fixed number of seats, we can't all get the representatives we want. Members of a party are not fungible.

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo 2 points 1 hour ago

I think a lot of people would feel free to vote for the representative they truly want instead of feeling forced to vote strategically against someone they don't want

[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago

really sad that FPTP here led to the inevitable outcome: the only party that shouldn’t have won did win

[–] Evkob 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Also, why the fuck would you vote NDP in a riding where the Greens actually have a chance (or vice versa)?

Their platforms have way more in common than they differ.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah that's exactly what I thought would happen. Come in here thinking "of course, people will find a way to blame the NDP here instead of the liberals" instantly proved right.

NDP incumbent beaten by people moving to liberals? Those NDP voters, who still had more than the liberals, should've voted libral. Green voters move to the Librals against the incombant? Nah, those dastardly NDP caused this. Cons win by a landslide? Somehow, you guessed it, NDPs fault

[–] Evkob 2 points 6 hours ago

I'm not blaming the NDP voters in this riding instead of the Liberal voters, I'm blaming them alongside the Lib voters.

[–] HikingVet 0 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This angers me. How can you not understand the concept of vote splitting, and vote against a well-supported (and deserving) incumbent? For shame.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago

either way it’s bad: either vote splitting happens or people vote strategically and not actually what they want

FPTP is a fucking scourge

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago

I'd argue that a pretty large proportion of voters know nothing about who they're voting for besides the party they represent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you're not blaming the voter. All blame lies in the politician, the moment they put their name on the poll this will 100% happen. They should've done some homework to prevent this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes, the party and the politician are the root cause, but I do hold some expectations for the voter as well. If we're getting people out to vote even if they're entirely ignorant of the process and outcome, I don't see that as a win.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Anything* But Conservative (* some conditions apply). 🤪