this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
556 points (93.8% liked)

Fuck AI

3126 readers
697 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brian 117 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

While the original certainly has an actual style, i have to say that I have no fucking clue what I'm looking at with the trump face

[–] [email protected] 82 points 4 weeks ago

looks like he's trying to make plane noises

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 weeks ago

They exaggerated Trump's characteristic pucker

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 weeks ago

An ugly as hell style (IMO), but a style nonetheless. The AI feels like a fastfood drawing.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

WTF is happening to his face in the original?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 weeks ago

Pucker. Exaggerated.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 weeks ago

I think he's making airplane noises — maybe the artist wanted to show him as utterly oblivious, and enjoying being a plane

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

Im so confused about people saying they prefer the ai one. Just to double triple check that were all on the same page here, the ai one is the bottom one, right??

I think the bottom one is extremely boring and the top one looks sick af.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

The AI one is generic and easier to read. Some people like that 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm with you. The top one is a unique style, while the bottom one is about as generic as it gets, not to mention it has that damn yellowed background AI always uses for comics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think they are both cool 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

If the person holding Trump was a caricature of an Israeli many would have lost their minds and called it antisemitic. But when it is an Arab no one cares about antisemitism anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

Might be an unpopular opinion but honestly the ai one isnt even that bad

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (9 children)
  1. It's a knock-off copy of an original idea
  2. The copy missed an important detail, clearly intended by the original artist: Trump's face. In the original artwork Trump is pictured as oblivious to the situation, making the plane noises, acting childish. In the statistical engine generated image, no such emotion is depicted.
  3. A few important details, actually. In the original the Qatari is looking straight at the "camera", in a kind of "see this?" way.
  4. Sloppy gen artifacts everywhere
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

The Qatari looks dead and lifeless, staring into the distance in the AI one.

The real one he looks quite sinister, like he’s pulling the strings and he knows it. Part of that is, as you mentioned, his look into the camera, and another part is the lighting the artist chose, which is entirely absent in the AI image.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I prefer the AI one just because I don't understand what they are going for with Trump's face in the original. I assume he's supposed to look like something specific that I'm not understanding.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I think he's supposed to be making vroom noises

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Looks like his face was run over by a truck. I can't make out a face at all in the original.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CherryBullets 3 points 4 weeks ago

As an artist myself, I agree.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Interesting. AI cannot make proper caricatures of people's faces apparently.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago

I'm seeing this shitty AI style with the thick lines everywhere. It triggers a deep rage in my lizard brain like Corporate Memphis does but it's much worse

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it that hard to criticize Arab leaders for their politics without being racist about it?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

How is the depiction racist? Th entire purpose is to represent a country/culture... If you think that basal appearances are being racist when it's literally a charicature, you're still too stuck in the land of Political Correctness. Stop being a PC thinker.

In fact, I think it's depicting specifically Saudi royalty, who often show up in public wearing traditional garb, exactly as depicted. So... the comic being accurate makes you call it ... racist? Learn some damn media literacy before it's too late...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Pretty sure his face is supposed to look like a bottle opener. It looked weird small on my phone but zooming in I think it's clear. The intent is to parallel the phrase "opening up the Middle East to America" while turning the roles on their heads, he is opening America to the Middle East.

This is an extremely simple use of visual metaphor and the AI predictably flunks hard by excreting something which pleases aesthetically but is spiritually and artistically barren.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

Hm neither one looks particularly like Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, and the headdress style is Saudi Arabian in both.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

Cheap lazy co-opting fucks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›