A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
As long as no one gives them the idea that a hostile occupation is sustainable in perpetuity, we'll be fine.
Technically anyone could attack nato but that doesn’t mean it would be successful
In reality, Russia is going to attack with scrap metal and use its entire population as cannon fodder to claim they have committed "genocide."
Russia is comitting genocide against Russians. It's the most Russian thing I can think of. Like ~ 1,000,000 deaths.
Successfully?
No. But much like an erratic hobo with an unfolded knife, I have zero desire to allow them the ability to attack anybody.
Who knows? Their attack on Ukraine hasn't gone to plan.
According to what ? Credible défense I'm sure
Attack with what? All the rusted metal hulks and organic fertilizer they’ve left strewn across eastern Ukraine?
I don't think the SG actually believes that, but whatever serves the goal of European military independence.
The more concerning shorter term threat is a rogue United States, but that's a hell of a thing to admit publicly.
I'd say even more concerning is rogue Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, along with help of Belarus and possibly NK on a full scale war against NATO. Trump is dumb, but not that dumb to be attacking WITH Russia, since it would be much easier to claim some uninhabited Russian land full of natural resources compared to rather populated European countries without that much natural resources.
They could attack NATO tomorrow, if they so desired. It would be a bloodbath, but an attack nonetheless.
Russia attacking NATO
aaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha ok bro
also, "a quantum leap in our collective defense" so then a teeny tiny step?
Two percent GDP to five percent GDP isn’t a teeny tiny step.
you're missing the point I'm pedantically making. "a quantum leap" is not a big jump, it's a tiny step.
this is an inaccurate assertion. the usage of the word "quantum" as an adjective (as it is used in the op) means large or significant.
see source.
Honestly, no it couldn’t. That’s not a credible threat. And it’s not just about materiel losses. They sent most of their trainers to the front lines a few years ago. You.. just don’t do that. It makes it impossible to regenerate your forces.
And 1B drones.